Niqnaq

cartalucci on lebanese fighting

with one comment

USraeli and Saudi-funded terrorists in Lebanon
Tony Cartalucci, Land Destroyer, May 14 2012

According to Seymour Hersh’s 2007 New Yorker article “The Redirection,” USrael and Saudi Arabia had been assembling a region-wide army of extremist-mercenaries to battle Hezbollah in Lebanon, destabilize and overthrow Syria, and create a united front against Iran. The forces recruited for this effort would come from the ranks of the CIA-created “Arab foreign legion,” Al Qaeda itself, and extremist groups fresh back from fighting US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, including listed terror organizations like the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) from Libya. Hersh’s 2007 report exposed the groundwork for the very violence unfolding in Syria today, and now Lebanon. Forces to destabilize Syria were primarily to be staged in northern Lebanon, as explained in the article, and indeed the heaviest fighting over the last year has been seen in the Syrian city of Homs, just across the border from northern Lebanon. Assad and his government have been, since the beginning of the violence, attempting to illustrate just this, explained in detail in 2007, and demonstratively being carried out today, with responsibility for deadly bombings being claimed by terrorists, the Pentagon itself admitting Al Qaeda is present in Syria, and reports indicating foreign fighters, weapons, and cash are flowing over Syria’s borders.

Now, the very staging ground in northern Lebanon being used to destabilize neighboring Syria has erupted into violence. Not by Syrian troops crossing the border, but by indigenous Lebanese factions facing off against each other. News is trickling out slowly and the Western media appears intent on keeping the violence as nebulous and confused as possible, but initial information indicates that extremist groups backed by USrael and Saudi Arabia are fighting factions connected to Hezbollah. Extremist leaders across the region are attempting to frame the violence as “Sunni versus Shi’ia,” a ploy Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah warned against back in 2007:

Nasrallah accused the Bush Administration of working with Israel to deliberately instigate fitna. He said: “In my opinion, there is a huge campaign through the media throughout the world to put each side up against the other. I believe that all this is being run by USraeli intelligence.” He did not provide any specific evidence for this. He said that the US war in Iraq had increased sectarian tensions, but argued that Hezbollah had tried to prevent them from spreading into Lebanon. Sunni-Shi’ite confrontations increased, along with violence, in the weeks after we talked.

Far from genuine sectarian violence, it was planned since 2007 to use terrorist proxies in a battle stretching from Lebanon to Iran, with Arab nations from North Africa to the Middle East aiding the effort, dominated by freshly-installed US proxies (Tunisia & Libya) and the Muslim Brotherhood, stated in Hersh’s 2007 article to be wards of the West. Violence has raged for nearly a week, in and around Lebanon’s northern port city of Tripoli. While being depicted as violence “spilling over” from Syria, it is clear that the violence is indigenous, sectarian in nature, and directly related to the larger conflict envisioned by USraeli-Saudi machinations in 2007, pitting Sunnis against Shi’a.

An editorial from NOW Lebanon reveals the “sectarian” nature of the violence in Lebanon and how both sides identify as either supporters or opponents of the neighboring Syrian government. This prevailing “sectarian” aspect reveals what has been stated by geopolitical analysts since the beginning of unrest in Syria: that the violence was driven not by “pro-democratic” aspirations, but by sectarian violence exploited for the sole purpose of advancing the agenda of foreign meddlers; sectarian violence that has now manifested itself in attacks on Christians, Druze, and Alawites, as well as moderate Sunnis across Syria in the midst of this so-called “democratic revolution.” The sectarian violence now unfolding in Tripoli is not unheard-of in Lebanon. The Lebanese military has already been reportedly deployed but is sitting on the sidelines as factions war in the streets. The violence may ebb, as it has in the past, but with the Syrian unrest reaching a critical point and foreign powers desperate to change momentum that’s been working against them, foreign-backed terrorist forces could try to ignite a wider sectarian battle in Lebanon. This could be to paralyze Hezbollah ahead of a coup de grâce delivered to Syria by Turkey, or to simply inflame the entire region in conflict, making the movement of weapons, cash, and foreign support to proxy forces easier, as well as greasing the skids for introducing a Kosovo-style intervention. Regardless, “sectarian” differences between Sunni and Shi’ia were planned for exploitation since at least as early as 2007 by USrael and Saudi Arabia, for the sole purpose of advancing their self-serving hegemonic agendas throughout the region. The violence that both sides are playing into will deprive their communities of the security and stability needed for all to prosper and progress, and ultimately leave them at the mercy of foreign dominion.

Written by niqnaq

May 15, 2012 at 6:59 am

Posted in Uncategorized

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. I’d suggest that the seed of unintended consequences, the epitome of Murphy’s law resides within attempt to manipulate and dictate to the Hezbollah.

    hp

    May 15, 2012 at 5:13 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 84 other followers