this is the sort of thing that gives feminism a bad name

Shamir named these two some days ago: “Anna Ardin … had already arranged an appointment with her good friend, policewoman Irmeli Krans. Anna Ardin and Irmeli Krans were once political running mates for a city hall election. Irmeli came in at 38th place and Anna won 12th. Irmeli is a well-known gender activist, a member of the LGBT movement and the Gay Police Union. Krans’s blog is full of pictures taken at gay parades from Riga, Tallinn, and Stockholm. It might appear as if this stern criminal investigator treats her police work as a hobby while her real work is attending gay parades all over Europe, but she dropped everything for the Assange case” – RB

Interrogator in the Assange case friend of woman accuser
Christian Holmén, Niklas Svensson, Expressen (Sweden), Mar 10 2011

The police interrogator in the Julian Assange investigation is a friend of one of the two women who is accusing the Wikileaks founder of sexual assault, Expressen can now reveal. Personal remarks on the internet reveal that the interrogator and the woman who reported Julian Assange had contact already in Apr 2009. This was sixteen months before Assange was reported to the police for, among other things, rape allegations. Assange and his lawyers have on several occasions criticized the Swedish judicial system and claimed that all possibilities of a fair trial have been eradicated. The prosecutor has been accused of breach of duty and the investigation has been criticized for being a politicial conspiracy. Assange has referred to Sweden as the “Saudi Arabia of feminism.” Expressen can today reveal that there actually existed both a political and a personal connection between one of the women plaintiffs and one of the police interrogators, whose preliminary questioning weighed heavily when a duty prosecutor decided to order the arrest of Assange last year. The police interrogator and the woman got to know each other through the Swedish social democratic party, with which both are involved. The police interrogator has amongst other things been on the board of the LGBT social democrats. On her homepage she has published pictures of herself together with the retired leader of the party Mona Sahlin, and the former minister Thomas Bodström, the same Bodström who together with the social democrat Claes Borgström runs the law firm that has been hired by the plaintiffs in the Assange investigation. At the same time, the police interrogator has, despite participating in the criminal investigation against Assange, commented negatively about the Wikileaks founder on her Facebook page. When the Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet recently let its readers chat with Assange, the interrogator commented:

What the heck is this??? Judgement zero!!!

The day before she wrote in a status update on her Facebook-page:

Way to go, Claes Borgström!!!

In another status update from late February the police interrogator wrote about “the overrated Assange bubble ready to burst.” In their blogs, the police interrogator and the woman who reported Julian Assange have been open about their friendship. As recently as Feb 10 this year the woman commented a status update that the interrogator had on her facebook page. The woman still links from her homepage to the private blog of the police interrogator. The interrogator in turn links to her party friend and lawyer Thomas Bodström, who has a vested interest in the Assange case through his law firm. Already sixteen months before Julian Assange came to Sweden, invited by the woman who later reported him, the police interrogator and the woman had open correspondence through the internet. The police interrogator in Apr 2009 quoted a blog contribution that the woman had written about white men “who take the right to decide what is not abusive.” The police interrogator establishes that her party friend “puts her finger on the bottom line and speaks out.” The woman answered by leaving a personal greeting on the blog of the police interrogator, saying:

Hello! Thanks for the compliment. And like you say, white men must always defend the right to use abusive words. Then they of course deny that these very words are part of a system that keeps their group at the top of the social ladder.

Sixteen months later the female police officer, as interrogator in the Assange investigation, would play an important role when the duty prosecutor ordered the arrest of the Wikileaks founder, suspected of rape and sexual molestation. The female police officer had just started her shift at the Klara police station in central Stockholm when the two women showed up. It was on the afternoon of Aug 20. Just sixteen hours later Expressen’s scoop of the arrest order against Julian Assange became worldwide news. The female police officer soon realised that her friend and party colleague was one of the plaintiffs, yet she was still the first to interrogate one of the women in the case. At 16.21 she started the questioning of the other plaintiff, without reporting a conflict of interest that made her participation in the case challengeable. This questioning session initially came to play a decisive role when duty prosecutor Maria Häljebo Kjellstrand decided to order the arrest of Julian Assange. Kjellstrand decided that the facts reported to the police interrogation were so credible that the level of suspicion was probable cause. Expressen has on several occasions recently had contact with the female police officer via e-mail. Initially she said she was prepared to answer all questions. But on Wednesday she said:

It has been decided that questions about the police handling of this matter will be answered by Ulf Göranzon (the police press officer) and questions about the ongoing investigation will be answered by the prosecutor. I cannot comment on the matter as a police officer.

Police superintendent Ulf Göranzon tells Expressen that he is not aware of the fact that the police interrogator is a friend of one of the plaintiffs. We asked:

What do you say to those who mean that the public trust for the police has been tarnished by the fact that one of the investigators is a friend of one of the plaintiffs?

He replied:

Since I do not have any facts, other than rumours, I will not comment on that.

Karin Rosander, information director at the office Of the Public Prosecutor, comments on the new findings:

We know that rumours are going around, but the prosecutor has explicitly said that she will not give any comments in this matter while there is an ongoing process in England.

One Comment

  1. Posted March 10, 2011 at 9:45 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for posting this. It seems this is the smoking gun, the missing link (along with evidence that Karl Rove also has ties to these people) that proves Michael Moore’s and Naomi Wolf’s original claim that Assange was framed.

    What gets me is that this particular set-up serves two ugly purposes. In addition to demonizing (and possibly jailing) Assange on frivolous charges – has, yet again, caused deep fissures betwee feminists and other progressives. The whole Wikileaks/feminist controversy has smelled like classic Cointelpro tactics from the beginning.

    The use of identity politics to divide the progressive movement dates back to the 1960s. I write about my sad personal experiences with all this in my recent memoir THE MOST REVOLUTIONARY ACT: MEMOIR OF AN AMERICAN REFUGEE (www.stuartbramhall.com). I currently live in exile in New Zealand

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.