the return of max boot (presumably from cryogenic suspension)

Neo-Cons Hypocritically Leverage “Human Rights” Against China
Tony Cartalucci, Land Destroyer, May 1 2012

A man who has championed every war USAia has fought in recent history, as well as desperately pleading to start a wide array of wars yet fought, including against Syria and Iran, and who has played a part in devising and supporting military campaigns that have cost millions of lives, millions more maimed, displaced or otherwise affected, would be the last person one would expect to peddle “human rights.” And especially, one would not suspect such a man to make the bold claim that the US, whose enforced sanctions against Iraq alone killed over a million women and children through starvation, is the “the greatest champion of human rights in the world.” Yet that is exactly what Max Boot, a Council on Foreign Relations member, as well as a contributor to a myriad of Neo-Conservative, pro-war corporate-financier funded think-tanks, has done. Max Boot makes his astounding comments regarding the recent row between the US, their long-cultivated “activist,” Chen Guangcheng (also known as the “blind activist”), and the government of China whom the US is preparing to meet with for talks. Clearly Max Boot represents a cadre of individuals who have been in reality the greatest violators of human rights in the world, and thus, his column in “Commentary” titled, “Standing Up for Human Rights in China,” is an astounding and transparent example of the exploitation of otherwise noble principles.

Boot of course never mentions the fact that Chen has been built up over the years through a US State Dept marketing campaign involving their National Endowment for Democracy (NED) front and various Chinese “NGOs” directly funded by and reporting to NED. These include ChinaAid and China Digital Times who were admitted as NED grantees in NED’s own publication, “Democracy Digest.” It should be mentioned that NED’s board of directors, like Boot, are card-carrying Neo-Conservatives, pro-war, and represent some of the largest corporate-financier interests on Earth, whose policies and actions directly contradict NED’s alleged mission of “supporting freedom around the world.” Boot also fails to mention the fact that China’s “forced sterilization and abortion policies” are funded and supported, even whitewashed by the UN Population Fund, which is itself directly funded by the US. The UN also coincidentally served as a vehicle for Boot and his colleagues’ crimes against humanity, most recently in Libya. China’s policies were also designed, pioneered, and carried out globally by predominantly US and UK eugenicists, including the Carnegie Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, and even USAID, who was caught forcibly sterilizing hundreds of thousands of Peruvian women in the late 1990’s. It was in fact the UKUSAians who laid the ground work, and even literally the German programs that Hilter’s genocidal eugenics cult rose from.

So then one is left asking whether Boot’s column is satire or if he truly believes his readership is so poorly informed, so intellectually stunted, and so emotionally compromised that they will believe his rhetoric at face value. Or perhaps Boot’s column is simply a template for the compromised corporate media to copy and paste from, as we see Reuters already doing here, echoing Boot’s talking point a day later, regarding Chen’s humiliating China’s internal security apparatus.Indeed, a long-cultivated US State Dept asset making a “miraculous escape” on the eve of a high-profile meeting between US and Chinese representatives, after China has repeatedly blocked US ambitions to ravage Syria, a war Boot is an ecstatic proponent of, is yet another example of how the West’s most ghoulish mechanizations are propelled with facades constructed of the most noble intentions for the expressed purpose of putting pressure on those resisting them. Undoubtedly the corporate-media will spread to the four corners of the globe Boot’s talking points, preying on anyone unwilling to spend the five minutes it takes to look behind the curtain and see what is truly at work.

US Using Staged “Blind Activist” Stunt For Leverage Ahead of Talks
Tony Cartalucci, Land Destroyer, Apr 30 2012

Reuters has recently reported in their article, “US eyes testy China talks, Chen backer expects Chinese decision,” that “religious and political rights advocacy group ChinaAid is the chief source of information about Chen,” referring to Chen Guangcheng, the “blind activist” who has allegedly escaped from house arrest recently and who “activists” claim is being harbored by the US in their embassy in Beijing. While Reuters alludes to the fact that ChinaAid is “US-based,” it fails to mention that it is in fact funded by the US State Dept through its National Endowment for Democracy (NED) front. Democracy Digest, NED’s own publication reported in 2011 in their article titled “‘Extraordinary’ campaign for barefoot lawyer Chen Guangcheng,” that:

Chen Guangcheng was a recipient in absentia of the National Endowment for Democracy‘s 2008 Democracy Award. ChinaAid and China Digital Times are NED grantees.

Both ChinaAid and China Digital Times have been leading the propaganda efforts to grow attention and interest around the Chen Guangcheng “blind activist” case for years and is part of the West’s grander strategy of undermining the Chinese government by disingenuously leveraging “human rights” issues, even as they serially violate, and support the violation of, human rights around the world, most recently in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Iran, and Syria. In addition to a general strategy of encircling, containing, and undermining China, this most recent high profile stunt is meant to give the US an advantage ahead of upcoming talks, mentioned in the above Reuters article. China along with Russia has been blocking Western efforts to use the UN as a vehicle to legitimize a war of aggression against Syria and to further isolate Iran. China’s economic policies have also been a source of contention for the West’s ruling banking oligarchs. It must also be remembered that US policy toward China must be considered within the context of the US State Dept’s declared “USAia’s Pacific Century” policy, where Sec State Clinton openly announced ambitions to reassert US hegemony across Asia and lining up a coalition of Southeast Asian nations against China.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s