Syrian War: The Prequel – 2007 New Yorker Article
Exposed USraeli-Saudi conspiracy to overthrow Assad
Tony Cartalucci, Land Destroyer, May 10 2012
- Muslim Brotherhood is funded by & serves as the primary instrument of USrael & Saudi Arabia.
- Lebanon was designated as staging ground to destabilize Syria with Sunni extremists.
- Saudi and Muslim Brotherhood anti-USraeli sentiments are feigned.
- US intelligence knew in advance unleashing Sunni extremists would result in genocide.
- Saudis & US admit Sunni extremists, the foundation of Al Qaeda, are under their control.
The Muslim Brotherhood and various “hardline” Sunni political factions sweeping into power in the wake of the US-engineered “Arab Spring,” have been feigning anti-USraeli and anti-Western sentiments in an attempt to swell their ranks with followers before ultimately forming a united Sunni front against Iran. The creation of a united Sunni front was noted by Webster Tarpley, who has from the beginning stated:
The various possible governments resulting from these engineered revolutions could then be used to support the fundamental US-UK strategy for the Middle East, which is to assemble a block of Arab and Sunni countries (notably Egypt, Saudis, Gulf states, and Jordan) which, formed into a front with the participation of Israel, would collide with the Iranian Shi’ite front, including Syria, Hezbollah, and various radical forces.
Image: Red = US-backed destabilization, Blue = US occupying/stationed. Iran and Syria are completely surrounded by either client states or nations occupied by US forces. And while the complexity of West’s reordering of the Arab World is staggering, it is but a part of a grander strategy to eliminate the nation-state and establish global hegemony.
Confirming this is a 2007 New Yorker article by Seymour Hersh titled “The Redirection: Is the Administration’s new policy benefiting our enemies in the war on terrorism?” It covers everything from admissions that the USraelis and Saudis are working together, despite the Saudis and their Sunni proxies’ attempts to portray themselves as “anti-Israeli,” to admissions that the US is funding a region-wide network of militants and terrorists, many of whom have literally trained at Al Qaeda camps. The article also describes in great detail the role of the Hariri faction in Lebanon, working closely with the Saudis and US, and their role in creating a safe haven for terrorist organizations on Lebanese soil, now involved fully in destabilizing neighboring Syria. Clearly, what has been recently portrayed by the West as mere “claims” by the Syrian government that the Saudis, Lebanese, and NATO were conspiring against them, is simply the fruition of the US policy exposed fully in the New Yorker in 2007. While many analysts have treated the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and their involvement in Syria’s uprising as a somewhat nebulous phenomenon, Hersh’s article makes it clear that the Brotherhood is one of the primary instruments used by the Saudis as part of a USraeli-Saudi effort to eliminate Syria and Iran. Not only that, but the report indicates that the US itself has been funding and using the Muslim Brotherhood as well. Just as the US State Dept feigned shock and confusion at the “Arab Spring” it had been preparing for the last 3 years, it is likewise reacting with feigned confusion and dismay over the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in the “Arab Spring’s” wake. In reality it is a premeditated consequence of US foreign policy spanning both the Bush and now the Obama administrations. While in 2007, all of this was “soon to be,” in retrospect we see just how devastatingly accurate Hersh’s reporting was. It is clear now, with the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood and the Sunni-extremist dominated, foreign-funded destabilization ravaging Syria, that this policy created during the Bush administration has transcended presidencies and is being brought to its premeditated conclusion under Obama: yet another example of “continuity of agenda.”
USrael and Saudi Arabia are behind Syria’s violence
The evidence trickling out of the corporate media reveals that the Syrian opposition is predominately an extremist Sunni movement, not only including Syrian extremists, but militants crossing the border from Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, and even from as far as Libya. An alliance of Gulf States led by Saudi Arabia have pledged funds for Syria’s militants and has repeatedly called for openly arming them. The US is likewise openly equipping Syrian militants. This reality is not merely a spontaneous reaction by the “international community,” but verbatim what was planned in detail by USrael and Saudi Arabia years in advance to topple the Syrian government before moving on to Iran, according to Hersh’s 2007 report:
To undermine Iran, which is predominantly Shi’ite, the Bush Administration has decided, in effect, to reconfigure its priorities in the Middle East. In Lebanon, the Administration has coöperated with Saudi Arabia’s government, which is Sunni, in clandestine operations that are intended to weaken Hezbollah, the Shi’ite organization that is backed by Iran. The US has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. The Saudi government, with Washington’s approval, would provide funds and logistical aid to weaken the government of President Bashir Assad of Syria. The Israelis believe that putting such pressure on the Assad government will make it more conciliatory and open to negotiations.
This mirrors sentiments included in the Brookings Institution’s 2009 report, “Which Path to Persia?” (p 109) where it was stated that reaching some sort of conclusion with Syria first was a prerequisite before attacking Iran:
The Israelis may want to hold off until they have a peace deal with Syria in hand (assuming that Jerusalem believes that one is within reach), which would help them mitigate blowback from Hizballah and potentially Hamas. Consequently, they might want Washington to push hard in mediating between Jerusalem and Damascus.
Clearly, what we are seeing today in Syria is the full manifestation of this premeditated conspiracy against the government and people of Syria, and in turn, against the Iranians. It should be noted that a US intelligence professional interviewed by Hersh for his story predicted that the Sunni extremists being prepared in 2007 for today’s violence would most likely go on a genocidal killing spree, as seen in Libya, and now being quietly reported by the Western press in Syria as well:
Robert Baer, a former longtime CIA agent in Lebanon, has been a severe critic of Hezbollah and has warned of its links to Iranian-sponsored terrorism. But now, he told me, “we’ve got Sunni Arabs preparing for cataclysmic conflict, and we will need somebody to protect the Christians in Lebanon. It used to be the French and the US who would do it, and now it’s going to be Nasrallah and the Shi’ites.“
That USrael and Saudi Arabia premeditated a regional conflict utilizing militant extremists with full knowledge they would commit wide-ranging genocidal atrocities, is clearly as much in reality a war crime as the US State Dept and US UN rep Susan Rice have claimed the Syrian government has committed as it desperately attempts to restore order in the face of an admitted act of foreign aggression.
The Muslim Brotherhood is a tool of USraeli-Saudi machinations
The Muslim Brotherhood is often portrayed as being anti-USraeli and anti-West in general. In reality they are a creation of, and have been ever since servants of, expanding Wall Street and London’s corporate-financier hegemony across the Islamic World. In Hersh’s 2007 report, it is made clear that the Brotherhood was the tool of choice of the USraeli and Saudi elite, with the US and Saudis reported as even then directly funding and backing them; backing that continues to this day, not only in Syria, but in Egypt as well. The Muslim Brotherhood’s rank and file surely believe in what they are being told by their leaders, but their leaders are professional demagogues peddling anti-USraeli rhetoric solely for public consumption while being fully complicit in the West’s designs against the Arab World. Hersh reported that a supporter of the Lebanese Hariri faction had met Dick Cheney in Washington and relayed personally the importance of using the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria in any move against the ruling government:
Jumblatt then told me that he had met with Cheney in Washington last fall to discuss, among other issues, the possibility of undermining Assad. He and his colleagues advised Cheney that, if the US does try to move against Syria, members of the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood would be the ones to talk to, Jumblatt said. There is evidence that the Administration’s redirection strategy has already benefitted the Brotherhood. The Syrian National Salvation Front is a coalition of opposition groups whose principal members are a faction led by Abdul Halim Khaddam, a former Syrian Vice-President who defected in 2005, and the Brotherhood. A former high-ranking CIA officer told me, “The US have provided both political and financial support. The Saudis are taking the lead with financial support, but there is US involvement.” He said that Khaddam, who now lives in Paris, was getting money from Saudi Arabia, with the knowledge of the White House. In 2005, a delegation of the Front’s members met with officials from the National Security Council, according to press reports. A former White House official told me that the Saudis had provided members of the Front with travel documents.
It was warned that such backing would benefit the Brotherhood as a whole, not just in Syria, and could affect public opinion even as far away as Egypt, where a long battle against the hardliners was fought in order to keep Egyptian governance secular. Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, also interviewed by Hersh for his 2007 article, perhaps described best the geopolitical gambit that USrael and Saudi Arabia were and are currently attempting to unfold:
Nasrallah accused USrael of deliberately instigating fitna, an Arabic word meaning insurrection and fragmentation within Islam. “In my opinion, there is a huge campaign through the media throughout the world to put each side up against the other,” he said. “I believe that all this is being run by USraeli intelligence.” He did not provide any specific evidence for this. He said that the US war in Iraq had increased sectarian tensions, but argued that Hezbollah had tried to prevent them from spreading into Lebanon. Sunni-Shi’ite confrontations increased, along with violence, in the weeks after we talked.
Indeed, divide and conquer has been used by empires since the beginning of time, and it appears that the very radical extremists the West has featured as civilization’s greatest enemy in their fraudulent “War on Terror” are creations and perpetuations of their own design. The role of Saudi Arabia and the Muslim Brotherhood, betraying millions of Sunni Muslims by exploiting their justified outrage of UK-USraeli foreign policy, has resulted in terrorism and violence, both spontaneous and engineered, that has destroyed millions of lives. The very “War on Terror” is the “management” of these exploited and cultivated extremists:
Bandar and other Saudis have assured the White House that they will keep a very close eye on the religious fundamentalists. Their message to us was ‘We’ve created this movement, and we can control it.’ It’s not that we don’t want the Salafis to throw bombs; it’s who they throw them at: Hezbollah, Moqtada al-Sadr, Iran, and at the Syrians, if they continue to work with Hezbollah and Iran.
For Empire, not National Security
The only fault that can be found in Hersh’s tremendous journalistic accomplishment is perhaps the pandering to the notion that all of this demonstrative deceit and indeed, criminality, may be being done in the interest of protecting Saudi Arabia and USrael. In reality, even the Brookings Institution, which was also included in Hersh’s report, admits that containing Iran is not a matter of national security for USrael, let alone Saudi Arabia, but a matter of maintaining the status quo, namely Western hegemony across the Middle East, with Saudi Arabia and USrael the principle dual benefactors. While behind closed doors US policy makers admit Iran, even if it were to obtain nuclear weapons, is driven by self-preservation and protecting the influence it is steadily gaining throughout the Middle Eastern region it borders, the message they desperately seek to relate to the public is one of an irrational apocalyptic theocracy eager to usher in Armageddon. However, reports out of the RAND corporation note that Iran has had chemical weapons in its inventory for decades, and other reports from RAND describe the strict control elite military units exercise over these weapons, making it unlikely they would end up in the hands of “terrorists.” The fact that Iran’s extensive chemical weapon stockpile has yet to be disseminated into the hands of non-state actors, along with the fact that these same elite units would in turn handle any Iranian nuclear weapons, lends further evidence to the conclusion that Iran is indeed driven by self-preservation and self-defense. Brookings notes on pages 24 and 25 of their “Which Path to Persia?” report, that the real threat is not the deployment of these weapons, but rather the deterrence they present, allowing Iran to counter US influence in the region without the fear of a US invasion.
The US and the West in general have viewed the Middle East as nothing more than a divided, broken Ottoman Empire to be used and exploited, and when nationalism or resistance emerges, to be pitted against itself in destructive conflicts. The fear of a powerful Iran overturning the status quo of US-UK hegemony expressed through proxies and multiple strategies of tension, Israel itself being one of them, would open the door for other nations to climb out from beneath the modern heirs of the British and French Empires and begin down the path of true self-determination. That includes freeing the people of Israel, laboring under a hijacked government misleading them into a pointless and perpetual conflict with not only the Palestinians, but with the Islamic World itself. Indeed, the ploy described in incredible detail by Seymour Hersh in 2007, and demonstratively playing out before our eyes today, is not to protect against existential threats to the people of Saudi Arabia or USrael, but against existential threats to their leadership’s self-serving hegemonic ambitions. It is being peddled by a coalition of Saudis and USraelis lying not only to the world, their allies, and their enemies, but to their own people about the nature of the conflict they demand troops and taxpayers to facilitate.
Terrorist bombings have recently ripped through Damascus, bearing all the hallmarks of Sunni extremists. With the back story now fully established, and the violence in Syria exposed as not only premeditated, but the devastating consequences of unleashing Sunni extremists being well known ahead of time, those insisting on backing this horrendous crime do so amidst a public increasingly aware of their transgressions against humanity. Baulking these murderous machinations is accomplished by Sunnis and Shi’a not falling into the traps laid out by USrael and Saudi Arabia in the form of the Muslim Brotherhood, and terror groups and “civil society” NGO’s alike, cultivated by these admitted international manipulators. Christians and Jews must likewise avoid the contrived “clash of civilizations” between themselves and hordes of terrorists created and cultivated by their own demagogic leaders. Finally, it is essential that people around the world recognize that the corporations and institutions they patronize on a daily basis with their time, money, energy, and attention are the ones ultimately devising and driving not only these plots, but the disingenuous politicians and media personalities we’ve mistakenly placed our trust in. We must begin to boycott and replace these corporations and institutions with genuine local alternatives, or suffer the tragic conclusion of allowing such deceitful megalomaniacs construct an inescapable world order they shall presume absolute dominion over.