Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood Joins Euro-USraeli Chorus for War in Syria
Tony Cartalucci, Land Destroyer, May 28 2012
One would expect allegedly “outspoken” critics of USrael to represent the antithesis of any joint USraeli foreign policy, especially when it involves mass-murdering large numbers of fellow Arabs to expand Western hegemony across the Middle East. Yet the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood has done the exact opposite, after a long campaign of feigned anti-USraelian propaganda during the Egyptian presidential run-up, the Muslim Brotherhood has joined Euro-USraeli calls for an “international” intervention in Syria. Ehud Barak recently called for international intervention in Syria citing the alleged Houla massacre, echoed by Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood spokesman Mahmoud Ghozlan who stated the same. The Syrian arm of the Muslim Brotherhood has been involved heavily, leading in fact, the USraeli, Saudi, and Qatari-backed sectarian violence that has been ravaging Syria for over a year. In a May 6 2012 Reuters article it stated:
Working quietly, the Brotherhood has been financing Free Syrian Army defectors based in Turkey and channeling money and supplies to Syria, reviving their base among small Sunni farmers and middle class Syrians, opposition sources say.
While Reuters categorically fails to explain the “how” behind the Brotherhood’s resurrection, it was revealed in Seymour Hersh’s 2007 New Yorker article, “The Redirection, as being directly backed by USrael who were funneling support through the Saudis so as to not compromise the “credibility” of the so-called “Islamic” movement. Hersh revealed that members of the Lebanese Saad Hariri clique, then led by Fouad Siniora, had been the go-between for US planners and the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood. Hersh reports the Lebanese Hariri faction had met Dick Cheney in Washington and relayed personally the importance of using the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria in any move against the ruling government:
Jumblatt then told me that he had met with Vice-President Cheney in Washington last fall to discuss, among other issues, the possibility of undermining Assad. He and his colleagues advised Cheney that, if the US does try to move against Syria, members of the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood would be “the ones to talk to,” Jumblatt said.
The article would continue by explaining how already in 2007, US and Saudi backing had begun benefiting the Brotherhood:
There is evidence that the Administration’s redirection strategy has already benefitted the Brotherhood. The Syrian National Salvation Front is a coalition of opposition groups whose principal members are a faction led by Abdul Halim Khaddam, a former Syrian Vice-President who defected in 2005, and the Brotherhood. A former high-ranking CIA officer told me, “The US have provided both political and financial support. The Saudis are taking the lead with financial support, but there is US involvement.” He said that Khaddam, who now lives in Paris, was getting money from Saudi Arabia, with the knowledge of the White House. In 2005, a delegation of the Front’s members met with officials from the National Security Council, according to press reports. A former White House official told me that the Saudis had provided members of the Front with travel documents.
It was warned that such backing would benefit the Brotherhood as a whole, not just in Syria, and could effect public opinion even as far as in Egypt, where a long battle against the hardliners was fought in order to keep Egyptian governance secular. Clearly, the Brotherhood did not spontaneously rise back to power in Syria, it was resurrected by USraeli and Saudi cash, weapons and directives. To the general public, the violence in Lebanon seems to have “spilled over” from Syria, with characters like Saad Hariri, a leading figure in an effort at fueling regional bifurcation between Sunni and Shi’a Muslims, being suddenly “involved” in the ongoing violence. To the general public, because of a willfully deceitful mass media, the Muslim Brotherhood’s sudden backing of Euro-USraeli and Gulf State calls for foreign intervention seems like a spontaneous reaction to the so-called Houla massacre. In reality, for those who are informed regarding the true back story of the geopolitical reordering of the Arab World, it is nothing more than the public roll-out of an orchestrated conspiracy years in the making, with each actor having long practiced their roles backstage together before coming out on stage and being introduced to the audience. Indeed, the Muslim Brotherhood and Saad Hariri have been working together with USrael and Saudi Arabia for years. The Muslim Brotherhood’s political resurrection was solely owed to the US-engineered “Arab Spring” and torrents of cash and backroom diplomatic support. The US State Dept on record had been preparing since at least as early as 2008, with Egyptian protest leaders flown to New York, trained, equipped, and funded courtesy of US taxpayers before being sent back to destabilize Egypt beginning in 2010 and culminating in the 2011 “Arab Spring.”
And while the Muslim Brotherhood is busy feigning hatred and belligerence towards USrael, they in turn have feigned fear and displeasure at the Brotherhood’s rise amidst political destabilization the West itself created and perpetuated solely to place the Brotherhood back in power. This gambit is perhaps best exposed with the rise and fall of another Western-backed proxy, Egypt’s Mohamed ElBaradei. In fact, the more unreasonable and frothing one’s anti-USraelian rhetoric becomes, the more likely they are in fact working directly with the West and using such rhetoric as a smoke screen. Mohamed ElBaradei, for example, attempted to ride the wave of anti-Western sentiment by regularly pointing out the odds he was at with the US over Iraq and Iran. USrael and the US in turn accused him of being an “Iranian” agent, and ElBaradei would regularly threaten to make war with Israel, should he be elected president of Egypt. We will see just how absurd this entire charade really is. In reality, ElBaradei sits as a trustee of a US corporate-financier funded think-tank, the International Crisis Group (ICG) alongside convicted criminal and billionaire Wall Street speculator, George Soros, geopolitical adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, suspected financial criminal Lawrence “Larry” Summers, and Neo-Conservative Richard Armitage. Additionally, sitting around the same table with ElBaradei is the President of Israel, Shimon Peres, Stanley Fischer who serves as governor of the Bank of Israel, and former-Foreign Minister of Israel Shlomo Ben-Ami. Beyond even this evidence, and before the “Arab Spring” even unfolded, another US corporate-financier funded think-tank, the CFR, pointed out the necessity of manipulating public perception to maneuver client regimes into power. In a Mar 2010 article titled “Is ElBaradei Egypt’s Hero?” published in CFR’s “Foreign Affairs,” it stated:
Further, Egypt’s close relationship with the US has become a critical and negative factor in Egyptian politics. The opposition has used these ties to delegitimize the regime, while the government has engaged in its own displays of anti-USAianism to insulate itself from such charges. If ElBaradei actually has a reasonable chance of fostering political reform in Egypt, then US policymakers would best serve his cause by not acting strongly.
Clearly, both Western and Israeli press not only refrained from “acting strongly,” they feigned immense displeasure at ElBaradei’s rise in Egyptian politics, while simultaneously showering his enemies and opponents with support to taint them in the eyes of an emotional, and apparently easily manipulated global public. In this light it is hard to take ElBaradei’s feigned anti-Western sentiments as anything more than an absolute coordinated deception, to mask the fact that he indeed is a direct representative of these very insidious manipulators. Likewise the Muslim Brotherhood is playing a double game, capitalizing on carefully cultivated hatred versus USrael, while in reality leading sectarian extremists toward fulfilling rather than balking Western machinations. Not only is this apparent in the propaganda game played by both the Brotherhood and their counterparts in Washington, London, Doha, and Tel Aviv, but demonstratively as the Brotherhood’s agenda now overtly converges with that of the US and Israel versus Syria, as stated would happen in 2007 by Seymour Hersh. It seems almost unimaginable that any Arab, regardless of their opinion of Iran, Syria, or Hezbollah in Lebanon, could believe that eliminating this countervailing force vis-a-vis the West and Israel will be to their advantage, especially as it becomes clear their “new” “Arab Spring-installed” leaders are in fact working with, not against Western hegemonic expansion across the Arab World.
In addition to the Muslim Brotherhood’s rise in Egypt and Syria, in Tunisia serving Western interests is the recently installed Moncef Marzouki, formally of the Tunisian League for Human Rights, a US National Endowment for Democracy and George Soros Open Society-funded International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) member organization. Marzouki, who spent two decades in exile in Paris, was also founder and head of the Arab Commission for Human Rights, a collaborating institution with the US NED World Movement for Democracy (WMD) including for a “Conference on Human Rights Activists in Exile” and a participant in the WMD “third assembly” alongside Marzouki’s Tunisian League for Human Rights, sponsored by NED, Soros’ Open Society, and USAID. In neighboring Libya, Marzouki’s counterpart, NATO-installed Prime Minister Abdurrahim el-Keib is listed as a “Professor and Chairman” of the Petroleum Institute, based in Abu Dhabi, UAE and sponsored by British Petroleum (BP), Shell, France’s Total, the Japan Oil Development Company, and the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company. Both Marzouki of Tunsia and el-Keib of Libya have vocally supported Western efforts at regime change in Syria, with Libya additionally supplying cash, weapons, and fighters drawn from the US State Dept-listed terror organization, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG).
Clearly with regime change on the table since the first Gulf War during the 1990’s, specific calls for regime change as early as 2002, and an articulated conspiracy to use sectarian militants to overthrow Syria, Hezbollah in Lebanon and in turn, undermine and destabilize Iran, on record since 2007, all hinged on the creation of a front of Western client-regimes across the Arab World. The US-engineered “Arab Spring” has demonstratively created such a front, which in turn has demonstratively contributed to the goal of isolating, undermining, and violently overthrowing Lebanon, Syria, and Iran. For the Arab World, it should be clear that the “enemy of my enemy” is most certainly not “my friend,” especially when that “enemy” is the result of an artificial strategy of tension created by those posing as “allies.” Sunni Muslims share a common enemy not only with their Shi’ia neighbors, but with all peoples, races, and religions from Africa to Asia. That enemy is UK-US imperialism which has perpetuated itself for centuries by nothing else other than its ability to divide, destroy, and conquer nations pitted against nations, north verses south, one religion verses another, one tribe against another. This is how they subjugated huge swaths of Africa, Central and Southeast Asia, and this is exactly how they are now conquering the Arab World.