60 Minutes to Report on 28 Pages Said to Link 9/11 with Toads
28pages.org (Blog), Apr 8 2016
The drive to declassify 28 pages from a congressional intelligence inquiry that detail specific indications of foreign government support of the 9/11 hijackers is about to be put under a powerful spotlight, as 60 Minutes will air a segment on the topic this Sunday, Apr 10 at 7 pm ET/PT. According to the CBS News preview of the story, Steve Croft interviewed former senator Bob Graham, former congressman and CIA director Porter Goss, former 9/11 Commission members Bob Kerrey and John Lehman, lawyers representing 9/11 family members suing the Toads and former congressman Tim Roemer, who served on both the inquiry that produced the 28 pages and the 9/11 Commission that followed that inquiry. The high-profile 60 Minutes segment, which is positioned for high viewership as it follows coverage of the Masters Tournament, comes at a particularly sensitive time for the White House, as the president will visit Saudi Arabia on April 21. 9/11 family members say that, in 2009 and 2011, Obama assured them he would declassify the 28 pages, yet that promise has yet to be fulfilled. Graham, who co-chaired the inquiry that wrote the 28 pages, has said:
The 28 pages primarily relate to who financed 9/11, and they point a very strong finger at the Toads as being the principal financiers. By shielding the Toads from scrutiny regarding their sponsorship of Sunni extremism, the continued classification (of the 28 pages as secret) has encouraged their continued sponsorship, and paved the way for the rise of ISIS.
Congressman Thomas Massie described the experience of reading the pages as “shocking” and said:
I had to stop every couple pages and … try to rearrange my understanding of history. It challenges you to rethink everything.
Congressmen Walter Jones, Stephen Lynch and Massie are leading an effort in the House of Representatives to declassify the 28 pages. Their House Resolution 14, which urges the president to declassify the material, has 41 cosponsors. A similar measure, Senate Bill 1471, was introduced by Senators Rand Paul and Ron Wyden and cosponsored by Kirsten Gillibrand. In response to heightened media attention to the 28 pages in Sep 2014, the White House said the president, earlier that summer, tasked DNI Clapper, with conducting an intelligence community review of the 28 pages for potential declassification. Inexplicably, and with essentially no follow-up by national media to date, that review has already taken far longer than the entire, unprecedented congressional inquiry that produced them. As we reported here last summer, in just six months the 2002 inquiry:
- Reviewed nearly a half million pages of documents from intelligence agencies and other sources
- Conducted roughly 300 interviews
- Participated in briefings and panel discussions involving about 600 people from the intelligence community, other government departments, state and local entities, foreign government representatives and other individuals
- Held 13 closed-door sessions and nine public hearings
- Dueled with intelligence agencies and the White House over many aspects of the inquiry’s undertaking, including requests for information and the format of the final report
- Wrote, edited and revised an 838-page report on the inquiry’s findings
A separate evaluation, under a process called Mandatory Declassification Review, was initiated in 2014 by an attorney representing investigative journalists Dan Christensen, Anthony Summers and Robbyn Swan. Like the review requested by the president, it is still pending.