This is all just shit, of course. You know better, or you should. But how can I tell? If you just this week or month landed here, lured by some exotic remarks about Jewish girls, and actually don’t know anything about anything, then you will just have to take my word for it that 9/11 was the product of multiple intelligence agencies led by CIA wittingly working with AQ – RB
The Missing 28 Pages: Pindostan’s “allies” pursue their own agendas
Philip Giraldi, Unz Review, Apr 26 2016
The redacted 28 pages describing the role of the Toads in 9/11 have become somewhat of a political football. At this point, I suspect the Obama administration is doing a damage assessment on them to determine whether they will in any way hurt Demagogue electoral prospects in November. As the missing pages will likely lead to increased speculation about a major cover-up carried out by the Bush 43 administration, Obama’s political advisers would likely be inclined to convince him to release the document if he is at all hesitating. If the pages are released, there will significant foreign policy fall-out. There have already been demands that the Toads be considered fair game for remedial lawsuits in Pindo courts, filed by families of victims of 9/11. There is currently a bill in Congress specifically authorizing such action. Riyadh has already responded to it by threatening massive retaliation if official Faschingstein does not take steps to prohibit such legal action, including the warning that it might consider selling off its $750b in Pindostan-based assets, which might produce a surge in Pindo interest rates. Faschingstein has up until now specifically protected the Toads in Pindo courts by having the State Dept intercede and grant them sovereign immunity, a privilege not extended to the Plastelinan Authority, or to Iran, both of which have been hammered by adverse judgements in Manhattan courtrooms. Given leaks from individuals who have either read the 28 pages or who have been informed of the contents, it is pretty clear what will be revealed. The Toads, concerned lest AQ begin directing its activity against themselves, were engaged in a program of bribing the group and even covertly supporting it, as long as it carried out its actions somewhere else. This meant in practice that the Toads were paying a modern equivalent of Danegeld to Osama bin Laden and not asking too many questions. In addition to the secret payments from the government, the 9/11 Commission also determined that a number of Islamic charities funded by individual Toads were also subsidizing AQ. In some cases, that the ostensibly charitable giving was clearly intended to aid extremist Sunni groups like AQ should have been clear to the donors, though such a link is necessarily difficult to demonstrate.
Some of the money that wound up in the hands of the 9/11 terrorists, 15 out of 19 of whom were Toad subjects, came through cut-out channels from the Toad Embassy in Faschingstein, where Bandar Bush was Ambassador. Nearly $130k appears to have wound up in the hands of two of the hijackers, Nawaq al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Midhar, sums originating from the Embassy in Faschingstein and the Toad Consulate in LA. Much of the money came from the personal bank account of Bandar’s wife Haifa, and also through the Embassy’s religious affairs office. Haifa’s contributions were directed through a cut-out in California to Osama al-Bayoumi, a suspected Toad intelligence operative, who in turn supported the hijackers. Haifa’s checks were made out in small amounts, $3k5/month. After 9/11, Bandar was one of the first visitors to the Bush White House. The Justice Dept immediately halted any investigation into all Toad activity, while the administration took steps to fly Toad boxtops and members of the bin Laden family out of the country. A recent NY Post article identifies a number of FBI special agents by name, who (said they) were astonished when they were told to stop looking at the Toads, as they were convinced that major leads in the investigation led directly to the Toad Embassy. According to the agents and other sources, the White House effectively blocked inquiry into any possible role of the Toads in 9/11. Those who have read the 28 pages seem to agree that the Toad King, Crown Prince and cabinet were uninvolved in the money transfers, but that does not preclude the Toad intelligence service and lower-level bureaucratic involvement as part of an ongoing clandestine relationship with AQ. Even so, given the possible blowback, it should be considered probable that there was no intention on the part of Toad boxtops to support an active terrorist plot unfolding in Pindostan. And the end recipients of other funding that wound up in the hands of hijackers might have been unknown to the donors and unrelated to any direct support of AQ, meaning that the 28 pages are likely little more than a series of allegations. Haifa’s payments that could have supported two terrorists might have been conceived by her as being purely charitable, as some Toad sources have suggested, and not part of some nefarious scheme.
And, of course, the big question is motive. That the Toads might be bribing a homegrown terrorist group to leave them alone is perhaps not surprising, but if they were supporting that group knowing that it was planning a major terrorist attack in Pindostan, that would be something quite different. Lacking any internal documents from the Toads, I would imagine the 28 pages will be unable to determine whether or not that was the case, and one might well assume that it would have been insanity for the Toads to support such an initiative. Another revelation from the discussion of the 28 pages, which reportedly constituted the entire “foreign involvement” section of the 592 pp 9/11 Committee report, was that there was indeed no investigation of anyone but the Toads. I have long argued that there were other plausible players in the drama, to include the Israelis, who were running a massive spying ring in Pindostan directed against Arabs and some of whom were seen celebrating as the twin towers went down. And there were also the Pakistanis, who appear to have facilitated the travel of several of the hijackers. The five “dancing Israeli” celebrants, who turned out to be employees of an Israeli-owned moving company in New Jersey, were arrested after 9/11 and held in Brooklyn, initially on charges relating to visa fraud. FBI interrogators questioned them for more than two months. Several were held in solitary confinement so they could not communicate with each other, and two of them were given repeated polygraph exams, which they failed when claiming that they were nothing more than students working summer jobs. The two men that the FBI focused on most intensively were believed to be Mossad staff officers (katsas – RB), and the other three were volunteers helping with surveillance (sayanim – RB). After 71 days, the Bush White House intervened, ordering the Israelis to be released and deported. They later complained about their treatment and sued the Pindo government.
There have also been unsubstantiated allegations that Pakistan might have helped fund or even carry out 9/11, but a stronger case can be made regarding the hijackers being known to the Pakistani ISI. Several of the alleged perpetrators of 9/11 spent considerable time in Pakistan prior to the attack, and it is unlikely that the ISI would have missed their presence, or the opportunity to recruit them as sources. It should surprise no-one that the Toads, Israelis and Pakistanis should all be pursuing their own agendas without regard for the interests of Pindostan, and no-one should get too exercised about it. One only has to look at contemporary Syria to realize that no-one is playing straight there, for all the talk of there being a “coalition” against ISIS. But one nevertheless has to ask why the White House did not demand a thorough investigation of possible foreign involvement after 9/11, and why only the 28 pages on the Toads appeared in the final report. What if the Toads were funding AQ, or if the Israelis suspected something was about to happen, even if neither knew the details of an impending terrorist attack in Pindostan? What if the Bush administration subsequently covered up those unpleasant revelations for various reasons? There should certainly be a reckoning, even now, and some people formerly in the government might well be good candidates for trial and imprisonment relating to their actions at that time. The Pindo creeple is paying the bills and bearing the burdens of our fractured foreign and national security policies, so it deserves a level of honesty from its government. As 9/11 has only served as a prelude to much worse slaughter and dislocation all around the world, much of it excused by what occurred that day, it is past time for the creeple to learn what really happened.