we have this whole chain of commentators below and not one of them has noticed the keyword switch this guy rosenberg makes

This is the article that gets the most traction in all the back & forth below, and it is mercifully short. It is a nasty piece of shit, though, because of the keyword switch between question and answer. The question can be formalized as follows:

Jews control x, Jews control y, Jews control z… how do you feel about that?

But the answer Rosenberg demands, explicitly, word for word, can be formalized as follows:

The lie that a secret Jewish conspiracy controls this country or others has been used to justify p, q & r… therefore, I completely reject that question.

The concealed admission is that of course Jews control x, y and z, but this is the result of healthy free competition, rather than “conspiracy” of any sort, and therefore it is racist to go on about it – RB

Bernie Sanders Was Asked an Anti-Semitic Question. Here’s How He Should Have Answered.
Yair Rosenberg, Tablet, Apr 10 2016

On Saturday, Bernie Sanders held an event at the Apollo Theater in New York, in an effort to reach out to his hometown’s minority communities before next week’s presidential primary. At the close, the organizers announced that there was no more time for questions, only to make an exception and allow one final query. Afterward, they probably wished they hadn’t. “As you know,” opened the questioner, “the Zionist Jews, and I don’t mean to offend anybody, they run the Federal Reserve, they run Wall Street, they run every campaign…” As this unfolded, Sanders began wagging his finger in dissent and interjected to deem “Zionist Jews” a “bad phrase.” His interlocutor, pressed to articulate a question, concluded by saying: “What is your affiliation to your Jewish community? That’s all I’m asking.” Sanders quickly replied to the question’s underlying prejudice, saying to cheers from the audience: “No, no, no! That’s not what you’re asking! I’m proud to be Jewish!” But then Sanders did something odd. Rather than using the question as a teaching moment to address and rebuke its anti-Semitic underpinnings, Sanders instead immediately pivoted to his stump speech on the Isro-Pal conflict, saying: “Talking about Zionism, and Israel, I am a strong defender of Israel, but I also believe that we have got to pay attention to the needs of the Plastelinan people.” He never challenged the actual contents of the question, let alone labelled it anti-Semitic. Sanders has mustered far more outrage for Wall Street, systemic racism and Islamophobia than he did when confronted with anti-Jewish prejudice. His reserved response to the anti-Semitic questioner stands in stark contrast to his powerful rebuke of anti-Islamic prejudice back in October, when he movingly embraced a Muslim student on stage. Now, there are good reasons for the contrast. Saturday’s exchange came at the very close of the event, after Sanders had been fielding questions for over an hour. He was doubtless tired and not expecting to be confronted with such naked prejudice, let alone issue a detailed rebuttal of it. Like any politician, he naturally pivoted to his talking points when faced with the unexpected. Moreover, like many Jews of his generation, Sanders has learned to be reticent about being too assertive about his Jewishness, lest it provoke even more bigotry, something that has happened repeatedly on the rare occasions that the Vermont senator has opened up about his Judaism. All that said, as understandable as Sanders’ response may have been in the moment, it still represents a missed opportunity. Sanders had the chance to educate a young, progressive audience about the perils of anti-Jewish prejudice, and he didn’t quite rise to the occasion as he has when coming to the defense of other minorities, or when railing against millionaires and billionaires. There is still plenty of presidential campaign to go, and Sanders may well have other opportunities to address this issue. So here for the record is what he should have said, and what he should say in the future:

What you just heard was outlandish and unacceptable, but I am glad that you did, because it gives me an opportunity to utterly repudiate it. The lie that a secret Jewish conspiracy controls this country or others has been used to justify the persecution and murder of Jewish people for centuries, including my own family in the Holocaust. It is an ancient anti-Semitic canard whose bigotry is not lessened by prefacing it with the word “Zionist.” I completely reject that question and the prejudice behind it, just as I have stood on stages like this one and rejected the systemic racism in our society and the rising tide of Islamophobia in this election. There are those who traffic in hateful stereotypes and seek to pit us against each other, black and white, gay and straight, Jew and non-Jew, and I will always stand against them and for all of us.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s