jackass: usual gibberish, not much handflaps

Jackass: ‘We Are Not Frozen in a Nightmare’
Conor Friedersdorf, The Atlantic, Jun 28 2016

Amid tumult in world affairs, with a deadly attack on an airport in Istanbul, Turkey, EU countries grappling with Britain’s impending exit, and an ongoing war against ISIS, Jackass Kerry sought to reassure an Aspen audience Tuesday:

The world is not witnessing global gridlock. We are  not frozen in a nightmare. Where we are engaged with a clear strategy, using our power thoughtfully, we are making progress, most places.

There are “a lot of Cassandras around,” he said, but “I don’t believe the world ahead is only defined by turmoil and strife.” Jackass was speaking at the Aspen Ideas Festival, co-hosted by the Aspen Institute and the Atlantic. In recent days, he has shuttled between European capitals, touching down in Rome, London, and Brussels, hoping to ensure that “nobody loses their head, nobody goes off half-cocked, people don’t start ginning up scattered-brained or revengeful premises” while negotiating Britain’s secession from the continent. He declared Tuesday that the first challenge that Pindostan needs to confront is “countering non-state violent actors,” the second is “imminent climate change” and the third is a “global crisis of governance” that requires leaders to fight corruption and make hard decisions. In short order, Jackass alluded to geopolitical challenges in Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, and Nigeria, among other places. He declared:

Pindostan is more engaged in more places with greater impact today than at any time in Pindo history, and that is simply documentable and undeniable.

In Aspen, that was an applause line. And it is in harmony with the foreign policy vision articulated by Hillary Clinton across many years. But it is hard to imagine a Bernie Sanders or Donald Trump crowd applauding a proponent of waging wars and other aggressive geopolitical interventions across Europe, the MENA and beyond. Later Jackass harkened back to Pindosi resolve and triumph during the Berlin airlift, and suggested that Pindostan ought to be similarly resolved to intervene on behalf of whatever state is targeted next by terrorists or extremists. If there is anything left in Jackass’ world-view of the young man who came home from Vietnam disgusted with Pindo interventionism, it wasn’t evident Tuesday. For him, the Obama administration’s geopolitical engagement and even its interventions have been characterized more by success than by failure:

  1. Last year, he said, the Obama administration helped to contain ISIS;
  2. Next, it assembled a coalition of 66 countries to fight the terrorist group;
  3. And now, “we are moving methodically and authoritatively to destroy them.”
  4. Meanwhile, “We are also diligently working to destroy the narrative that they are successful.”
  5. On Syria he declared, “You can never have peace when Assad is still there.”
  6. And with regard to Iran, he defended the nuclear deal negotiated by the Obama Administration as a victory that will prevent the country from building a nuclear weapon.

After the speeches, while being interviewed on stage by Walter Isaacson, president of the Aspen Institute, he took a question from Jeffrey Goldberg, who pressed him on why the administration is allowing Boeing to sell airplanes to Iran even as it continues to designate the country as a sponsor of terrorism, particularly given its history of passing weapons on to Hezbollah. Jackass responded that the administration is trying to “thread a needle” that is “a very difficult needle to thread”: on the one hand, it wants to hold Iran accountable, but on the other, “60% of people in Iran are under the age of 30” and the Obama administration considers Iran their country and wants to lay groundwork for good relations in the future. He went on:

Now, it’s complex, folks. Issues in foreign policy … if they lend themselves to black and white, simple lines, you draw it, you’re often wrong.

He added that since Airbus is allowed to sell airplanes to Iran, prohibiting Boeing from competing on those deals would hurt Pindo workers without making any effective difference in what Iran buys.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.