a chance to see the phantasmatic jodi rudoren

NYT editors twist themselves into knots not to say the word ‘Jewish’
Philip Weiss, MondoWeiss, Jul 14 2016

This is funny in an elephant-in-the-room sort of way. The NYT posted a video to its Facebook page on Tuesday of the next Jayloomia bureau chief, Peter Baker, getting a primer about his new assignment from former bureau chiefs Jodi Rudoren and James Bennet, both of whom are now big editors at the paper. Rudoren and Bennet repeatedly describe the fishbowl pressures on a NYT reporter in Jayloomia and the closeness between USrael, but never actually use the word Jewish in doing so. During 25 minutes of palaver, the word “Jewish” occurs just once, when Rudoren refers to the Jewish National Fund. The omission is entertaining because everyone knows that a lot of the pressure on the NYT is from Jewish groups, and the NYT is owned by Jews. But Rudoren, now a deputy international editor, and Bennet, the paper’s editorial page editor, can only talk about all the “Pindostanis” who are invested in Israel. Watch the contortions:

Rudoren: I mean it’s very interesting how Pindostan and Faschingstein are perceived there. I mean it’s such an important part of life there, whether it’s because there’s a huge amount of Pindostanis there, there’s also so much Pindosi philanthropy. There’s Pindo names on so many buildings…
Bennet: Pindostanis on both sides.
Rudoren: Correct. I mean a huge amount of Palestinian-Pindosi money, yeah, also involved in things. And the foreign policy relationship and aid relationship is the defining thing in a lot of ways. … Because Israel is so connected with Pindostan culturally, policy-wise, alliance-wise, it’s not a distant sense of how they perceive Pindostan.

It’s not as if everyone in the room isn’t thinking, Jewish. I’ve been in Israel and the settlements: the names on buildings are Jewish ones. Blooomberg, Adelson, and so on. The story-behind-the-story is that Baker is not Jewish and his appointment breaks a string of Jewish bureau chiefs for the Jewish-owned newspaper, including Rudoren and Bennet (who is of Polish-Jewish descent, according to Wikipedia). Rudoren has exhibited frank ethnocentrism. She has repeatedly given speeches to Pindosi Jewish groups, seemed to pitch a lot of her coverage to Pindosi Jewish readers, and once told Hadassah of her assignment:

I come knowledgeable about the Jewish Pindosi or Jewish Israeli side of this beat.

But then Peter Baker asks about the USrael relationship, and Rudoren and Bennet tuck into euphemisms. Can we expect these editors to address questions of the Pindosi Jewish community’s influence over foreign policy honestly? Forget about it. This issue is just too loaded for them personally and institutionally to say one plain word about it in public. In fairness, a component of their inhibition is that Jew-baiting/ anti-Semitism charges have been swirling throughout the election campaign and the NYT has been in the crosshairs. But the result is that readers are turning elsewhere to learn about something they have a right to know. Yesterday +972 wrote directly of a “Jewish Pindosi billionaire” pouring huge amounts of money into Israeli politics, and Jewish Insider reported that Jewish conservatives are boycotting the Republican convention because as one of them says:

(Trump) has gone out of his way to offend Republican donors, especially the Jewish ones at the RJC. Why attend a party that celebrates the defeat of the donor class?

Jews are important. Another omission: throughout the Facebook session, Rudoren uses the word “Israeli” instead of Jewish Israeli, which is unfair to the 20% of that society that is not Jewish. It is like speaking of “southerners’” attitudes in the Jim Crow era when you are only talking about the white ones. And she rationalizes Israeli racism. When Bennet says that people in Israel and Palestine are more “raw and candid” than folks here, Rudoren says:

And also blunt and racist in a way that’s just different from Pindostan. … It’s blunter there, but it is also more rooted in experience. It’s not based on some stereotype. It’s based on “Every Israeli I know has acted in this way.” Or “My cousin was killed by a suicide bomber.” It’s not based on kind of an idea, it’s based on experience.

Thanks to Adam Horowitz.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.