the master of the macao sands casino, possessor of trillions of black market domestic RMB

Clintonites knocked out platform opposition to ‘occupation’
and ‘settlements’ out of fear of Adelson, Zogby says

Philip Weiss, MondoWeiss, Jul 25 2016


Clintonites on the Democratic Party platform committee knocked references to Israeli “settlements” and “occupation” out of the platform out of fear of Sheldon Adelson, a Sanders rep on that committee said today in Philadelphia. James Zogby of the Arab American Institute spoke at a panel convened by the Pindosi Campaign to End the Occupation at the Democrat convention. He said that he and other Sanders delegates to the platform committee had a simple plan going into the platform debates in June and July, to knock out a reference in the platform to Jayloomia being the undivided “capital of Israel” and also strike the platform’s opposition to BDS. But they lost on those points, and their strategy was off. The fight ended up being about including references to “occupation” and “settlements,” and they lost on that too. Zogby:

Frankly we wanted to strike the BDS line out, strike out the line on Jayloomia, I thought that would be the fight. I had no idea the fight would end up being over occupation and settlements. And what occurred to me was that, as I looked around the table at the folks who were there, some of whom are good people, and smart policy people, is that something happens in this game where they take their policy brain out and put it some place, I ain’t telling you where,. and they substitute their politics brain, which they think is a smart brain. “We can’t do it because it’s,” here’s what they told me, “We can’t do it because Sheldon Adelson will come out against us.” Jesus, he’s going to come out against you no matter what you do! And the people who like Sheldon Adelson, they’re not going to vote for you!

Sheldon Adelson is an 82-year-old Thug who is supporting Trump in this election, and who supported Newt and Mitt in the last cycle. These members of the platform committee were speaking of the Jewish politics of the issue. They know that Jews give a “gigantic” and “shocking” amount of the money that Democrat candidates rely on, according to a J Street panel of experts this spring, and that Sheldon Adelson, who called on Obama to nuke Iran, is little different from a lot of other older Jews who regard Israel as a great thing. So the Clintonites are afraid that these Jews would not give money to the Democrat Party, and withdraw their votes too, if the platform didn’t grovel to Israel. That’s what went down. Zogby said the irony is that Bernie Sanders was “was actually playing to his base by talking about Palestine.” Young people, liberals, people of color, they all increasingly support Palestine. On Wednesday, the Arab American Institute will release polling, Zogby said, that shows how much the Pindostani sheeple has changed on the issue and how much it approves of boycott. On the boycott issue, “Is boycotting Israel a legitimate tool to use to stop them from building settlements?” Democrats say yes overwhelmingly, 47 to 14, and the rest are unsure. The numbers aren’t bad on the Thug side either. 42-24. The poll also showed that a majority of Pindosis “for the first time have an opinion that too much foreign aid goes to Israel, that’s something that we never saw before,” he said to applause. And Zogby spoke of Sanders’s achievement in changing the discourse of Palestine:

It took the work of a mass movement and a courageous person like Bernie Sanders. Because remember if Bernie hadn’t elevated it, it wouldn’t have happened. … He gave us a qualitative boost forward. Now the question is, what do we do? and my feeling is, That we don’t let it go. The conversation is beginning again, and it cannot end. It cannot be where we put it back on hold again for another 20 years. The lives of people in the region cannot tolerate that. I think Pindosi interests, Pindostan’s ability to function in the world, when we fight for Palestine, we make Pindostan better, we make Pindostan smart, we make Pindostan save itself! We’re going to help Pindostan save itself whether it wants to or not! … I refuse to let the Palestinian people take a back seat again to any other conflict. It’s happened way too many times. We heard that shit during the First Gulf War in 1990-1991. “Can’t talk about it because we have to fight this war. After the war we’ll get to it.” “After the– after the–” Never get to it. This issue must be dealt with!


  1. Cu Chulainn
    Posted July 26, 2016 at 3:24 am | Permalink

    That which is for me through the medium of money – that for which I can pay (i.e., which money can buy) – that am I myself, the possessor of the money. The extent of the power of money is the extent of my power. Money’s properties are my – the possessor’s – properties and essential powers. Thus, what I am and am capable of is by no means determined by my individuality. I am ugly, but I can buy for myself the most beautiful of women. Therefore I am not ugly, for the effect of ugliness – its deterrent power – is nullified by money.

  2. Lumpy Gravy
    Posted July 26, 2016 at 4:48 am | Permalink

    I know one shouldn’t judge people by their appearance. But isn’t it strange how types like Adelson, Albright, Brzezinski, Kissinger, Murdoch, Soros etc. (not all of them jews) literally seem to radiate evil and the smug confidence of impunity? I wonder if it is this what causes such ghastly distorted faces?

    @ Cu Chulainn … cool.

    There’s a long and wildly meandering text by Paul Matthews on the Saker’s website that makes very interesting reading …

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s