it’s not “saber-rattling” when we do it

Pindo Defense Contractors Tell Investors Russian Threat Is Great for Business
Lee Fang, Lee Fang, Aug 19 2016

The escalating anti-Russian rhetoric in the Pindo presidential campaign comes in the midst of a major push by military contractors to position Moscow as a potent enemy that must be countered with a drastic increase in military spending by NATO countries. Weapon makers have told investors that they are relying on tensions with Russia to fuel new business in the wake of Russian’s annexation of Crimea and modest increases in its military budget. In particular, the arms industry, both directly and through its arsenal of hired-gun, think-tank experts and lobbyists, is actively pressuring NATO member nations to hike defense spending in line with the NATO goal for member states to spend at least 2 percent of gross domestic product on defense. Army Gen (Retd) R Cody, a vice president at L-3 Communications, the seventh largest Pindosi defense contractor, explained to shareholders in December that the industry was faced with a historic opportunity. He said, according to a transcript of his remarks:

Following the end of the Cold War, peace pretty much broke out all over the world. The Wall came down. All defense budgets went south. Now, Russia is resurgent … Nations that belong to NATO are supposed to spend 2% of their GDP on defense. We know that uptick is coming and so we postured ourselves for it.

Speaking to investors at a conference hosted by Credit Suisse in June, Stuart Bradie, the chief executive of KBR, a military contractor, discussed “opportunities in Europe,” highlighting the increase in defense spending by NATO countries in response to “what’s happening with Russia and the Ukraine.” The National Defense Industrial Association, a lobby group for the industry, has called on Congress to make it easier for Pindosi contractors to sell arms abroad to allies in response to the threat from Russia. Recent articles in National Defense, NDIA’s magazine, discuss the need for NATO allies to boost maritime military spending, spending on Arctic systems, and missile defense, to counter Russia.

Many experts are unconvinced that Russia poses a direct military threat. The Soviet Union’s military once stood at over 4 million soldiers, but today Russia has less than 1 million. NATO’s combined military budget vastly outranks Russia’s, with Pindostan alone outspending Russia on its military by more than sevenfold, by $609b to less than $85b. And yet, the Aerospace Industries Association, a lobby group for Lockheed Martin, Textron, Raytheon, and other defense contractors, argued in February that the Pentagon is not spending enough to counter “Russian aggression on NATO’s doorstep.” Think tanks with major funding from defense contractors, including the Lexington Institute and the Atlantic Council, have similarly demanded higher defense spending to counter Russia. Stephen Hadley, the former National Security Advisor to Bush 43 now serving on the board of Raytheon, a firm competing for major NATO military contracts, has argued forcefully for hiking defense budgets and providing lethal aid to Ukraine. Hadley said in a speech last summer:

(We must) raise the cost for what Russia is doing in Ukraine … Even President Putin is sensitive to body bags.

The business press has noticed the development. The Washington Business Journal noted:

If anyone is benefiting from the unease between Russia and the rest of the world, it would have to be Bethesda-based Lockheed Martin Corp, which won a major contract from Poland, which is revamping its military in response to Russia.

Roman Schweizer, an analyst for the defense industry with Guggenheim Securities, predicted last year:

Eastern NATO countries will increase procurements in the wake of continued Russian activity in Ukraine.

At the Defence Security Exposition International, an arms dealer conference held in London last fall, contractors were quick to use Russia and rising defense budgets to hawk their products. A shoulder-fired-rocket touting representative from Saab told Defense One:

The tank threat is … much, much more closer to you today because Putin is doing something (in Ukraine).

William Hartung, director of the Arms & Security Project at the Center for International Policy, said:

Companies like Lockheed Martin and Boeing have pledged to increase the share of exports in their overall revenues, and they have been seeking major deals in East and Central Europe since the 1990s, when NATO expansion began. Pindo firms will be knocking at the door, looking to sell everything from fighter planes to missile defense systems. Russian saber-rattling (sic – RB) has additional benefits for weapons makers because it has become a standard part of the argument for higher Pentagon spending, even though the Pentagon already has more than enough money to address any actual threat to Pindostan.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s