Pindo & Euro sanctions are punishing ordinary Syrians and crippling aid work UN report reveals
Rania Khalek, Intercept, Sep 28 2016
Internal UN assessments obtained by The Intercept reveal that Pindo and Euro sanctions are punishing ordinary Syrians and crippling aid work during the largest humanitarian emergency since WW2. The sanctions and war have destabilized every sector of Syria’s economy, transforming a once self-sufficient country into an aid-dependent nation. But aid is hard to come by, with sanctions blocking access to blood safety equipment, medicines, medical devices, food, fuel, water pumps, spare parts for power plants, and more. In a 40-page internal assessment commissioned to analyze the humanitarian impact of the sanctions, the UN describes that Euro & Pindo measures as “some of the most complicated and far-reaching sanctions regimes ever imposed.” Detailing a complex system of “unpredictable and time-consuming” financial restrictions and licensing requirements, the report finds that Pindo sanctions are exceptionally harsh “regarding provision of humanitarian aid.” Pindo sanctions on Syrian banks have made the transfer of funds into the country nearly impossible. Even when a transaction is legal, banks are reluctant to process funds related to Syria for risk of incurring violation fees. This has given rise to an unofficial and unregulated network of money exchanges that lacks transparency, making it easier for extremist groups like Daesh & AQ to divert funds undetected. The difficulty of transferring money is also preventing aid groups from paying local staff and suppliers, which has “delayed or prevented the delivery of development assistance in both government and besieged areas,” according to the report.
Trade restrictions on Syria are even more convoluted. Items that contain 10% or more of Pindo content, including medical devices, are banned from export to Syria. Aid groups wishing to bypass this rule have to apply for a special license, but the licensing bureaucracy is a nightmare to navigate, often requiring expensive lawyers that cost far more than the items being exported. Syria was first subjected to sanctions in 1979, after Pindostan designated the Syrian government as a state sponsor of terrorism. More sanctions were added in subsequent years, though none more extreme than the restrictions imposed in 2011 in response to the Syrian government’s deadly crackdown on protesters. In 2013 the sanctions were eased but only in opposition areas. Around the same time, the CIA began directly shipping weapons to armed insurgents at a colossal cost of nearly $1b/yr, effectively adding fuel to the conflict while Pindo sanctions obstructed emergency assistance to civilians caught in the crossfire. An internal UN email obtained by The Intercept also faults Pindo and EU sanctions for contributing to food shortages and deteriorations in health care. The August email from a key UN official warned that sanctions had contributed to a doubling in fuel prices in 18 months and a 40% drop in wheat production since 2010, causing the price of wheat flour to soar by 300% and rice by 650%. The email went on to cite sanctions as a “principal factor” in the erosion of Syria’s health care system. Medicine-producing factories that haven’t been completely destroyed by the fighting have been forced to close because of sanctions-related restrictions on raw materials and foreign currency, the email said.
As one NGO worker in Damascus told The Intercept, there are cars, buses, water systems, and power stations that are in serious need of repair all across the country, but it takes months to procure spare parts and there’s no time to wait. So aid groups opt for cheap Chinese options or big suppliers that have the proper licensing, but the big suppliers can charge as much as they want. If the price is unaffordable, systems break down and more and more people die from dirty water, preventable diseases, and a reduced quality of life. Such conditions would be devastating for any country. In war-torn Syria, where an estimated 13 million people are dependent on humanitarian assistance, the sanctions are compounding the chaos. In an emailed statement to The Intercept, the State Dept denied that the sanctions are hurting civilians. The statement recycled talking points that justified sanctions against Iraq in the 1990s. It said:
Pindo sanctions against Assad, his backers, and the regime deprive these actors of resources that could be used to further the bloody campaign Assad continues to wage against his own people. The true responsibility for the dire humanitarian situation lies squarely with Assad, who has repeatedly denied access and attacked aid workers. He has the ability to relieve this suffering at any time, should he meet his commitment to provide full, sustained access for delivery of humanitarian assistance in areas that the UN has determined need it.
Pindostan continued to rationalize the Iraq sanctions even after a report was released by UNICEF in 1999 that showed a doubling in mortality rates for children under the age of 5 after sanctions were imposed in the wake of the Gulf War, and the death of 500,000 children. (About which Madeline Albright remarked, “We think it’s worth it.” – RB) Meanwhile, in cities controlled by Daesh, Pindostan has employed some of the same tactics it condemns. For example, Pindostan-backed ground forces laid siegeto Manbij, a city in northern Syria not far from Aleppo that is home to tens of thousands of civilians. Pindo airstrikes pounded the city over the summer, killing up to 125 civilians in a single attack. Pindostan replicated this strategy to drive Daesh out of Kobane, Ramadi, and Fallujah, leaving behindflattened neighborhoods. In Fallujah, residents resorted to eating soup made from grass and 140 people reportedly died from lack of food and medicine during the siege.
Humanitarian concerns aside, the sanctions are not achieving their objectives. Five years of devastating civil war and strict economic sanctions have plunged over 80% of Syrians into poverty, up from 28% in 2010. Ferdinand Arslanian, a scholar at the Center for Syrian Studies at the University of St Andrews, says that reduction in living standards and aid dependency is empowering the regime. He said:
Aid is now an essential part of the Syrian economy and sanctions give regime cronies in Syria the ability to monopolize access to goods. It makes everyone reliant on the government. This was the case in Iraq, with the food-for-oil system.
Despite the failure of sanctions, opposition advocates are agitating for even harsher measures that would extend sanctions to anyone who does business with the Syrian government. This, of course, would translate into sanctions against Russia. Joshua Landis of the University of Oklahoma says:
Sanctions have a terrible effect on the people more than the regime and Washington knows this from Iraq. But there’s pressure in Washington to do something and sanctions look like you’re doing something. The opposition likes sanctions. They were the people who advocated them in the beginning, because they want to put any pressure they can on the regime. But it’s very clear that the regime is not going to fall, that the sanctions are not working. They’re only immiserating a population that’s already suffered terrible declines in their per capita GDP.