the crap in the last 3 paras is incompatible with friendship btw nations

Gen K Kellogg is Assistant to the President, Executive Secretary of the NSC, and Chief of Staff. One of the six Deputy Assistants to the President (and also Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategic Planning) is Kevin Harrington. The hierarchy is such that Flyyn’s departure causes Harrington’s boss Gen Kellogg to assume Flynn’s place. Kellogg, who has been serving as the National Security Council’s Executive Secretary, becomes interim National Security Adviser, and a potential candidate for permanent successor. For Harrington history, go here – RB

Will Trump Repeal Sanctions on Russia? A Conversation with an NSC Planner
Patrick Tucker, Defense One, Feb 10 2017

Will Donald Trump repeal the Pindo sanctions on Russia? With the White House emitting decidedly mixed signals, Defense One asked Kevin Harrington, the deputy assistant to the president for strategic planning at the National Security Council, whether he could square them. Such signals include Nikki Haley’s first appearance at the UNSC, in which she said the sanctions would not be repealed “until Russia returns control over the peninsula to Ukraine,” a sentiment White House spokesman Sean Spicer has reiterated. But VP Pence has suggested that some unspecified future behavior by Putin might change things. Meanwhile, Michael Flynn may have discussed the matter with the Russian ambassador in December and lied about it since becoming national security advisor. Relatedly or not, Russian mediaand Kremlin officials appear to be convinced that a sanctions rollback is only a matter of time. Harrington told Defense One

I think the President is looking at this somewhat realistically and saying, ‘Russia is a very large country with 7,000 nuclear weapons, give or take, and 11 million barrels a day of oil production. Do you really want to be herding them to a really close relationship with China or is there a way to make this more constructive?

He said that one potential reason things might change is if Russia and Pindostan team up to fight terrorists. Harrington also said that a change in the sanctions policy was neither imminent nor out of the question. He said:

I don’t say that there will never, ever be a change in the future. These things are always changing. It’s not an exotic thing to be looking at if there is some way to change the relationship. One of the difficulties we’ve certainly had is stabilizing the Middle East situation and so there’s a lot of things to discuss with Russia.

Harrington isn’t the only one floating that idea; Kremlin officials have been pitching it as well. In a readoutof Vladimir Putin’s call with Trump from January, the Kremlin said in what was, perhaps, a reference to rolling back sanctions:

The sides stressed the importance of rebuilding mutually beneficial trade and economic ties between the two countries’ business communities. The two leaders emphasised that joining efforts in fighting the main threat, international terrorism, is a top priority.

The White House readout of the same conversation describes Trump and Putin sharing hope that “the two sides can move quickly to tackle terrorism and other important issues of mutual concern,” but makes no reference to “rebuilding economic ties.” Harrington said he believed that some sanctions should remain in place, specifically those dealing with Russia’s defense sector:

It’s obvious if weapons are being used to kill people in the Donbass region of Ukraine that you not sell them weapons.

In 2014, the State Dept changed the rules that govern the export of technology that could have military use. It prohibits companies from selling computer equipment, software, or munitions that could make Russia more lethal. Pentagon officials have warned that removing the restriction could make Russia a far more lethal adversary in the decades ahead. On Wednesday, a group of senators introduced legislation that would require Trump to notify Congress before he can roll back sanctions placed on Russia for the illegal invasion of Crimea or activities associated with election meddling.

2 Comments

  1. George
    Posted February 14, 2017 at 7:07 am | Permalink

    “For Harrington history” he believes the energy sector and technology interest provides a break from the financial collapses and a new horizon if the energy sector prices can be kept low for technology advancements in energy and other areas of technology. Well that sure sounds like a Gold Rush for a Bering Strait pipelines and transportation link up into the multi polar “New Silk Road” investments and infrastructure building to me, just saying.

    As for General Kellogg he said that Donald Trump has the temperament to be commander-in-chief and that he is a “change candidate.” If you don’t like the way things have gone the past ten years Trump is the candidate. So other than that, which by the ways goes back 2 years into the Bush Presidency I don’t know what to think of him yet although he has worked for defense contractors since his retirement from the Army.

  2. niqnaq
    Posted February 14, 2017 at 7:18 am | Permalink

    Nice comments, thanks.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s