as usual, everybody is steadfastly not mentioning israel

Toads Praise Trump As “True Friend of Muslims” While Tillerson Wants To Kick Them Off UNHRC
ZeroPointNow, Zero Hedge, Mar 16 2017

Toadland has been an interesting tap-dance for Donald Trump. During the 2016 election, Wikileaks revealed that the House of Toad heavily contributed to the Clinton Foundation, and reports surfaced that they funded 20% of Clinton’s campaign. It’s clear they had a lot riding on Hillary, some say in the hopes of co-opting the Pentagon into an intervention in Syria to topple Assad. The plan was regime change with the goal of installing yet another Western-friendly puppet government which would rubber-stamp a lucrative Toad/ Qatari pipeline through the country, exiting into the Mediterranean through Turkey, as opposed to a competing Russian/ Iranian/ Syrian pipeline.

pipecitypipepipecity

Wikileaks also revealed that the Toads and the Thanis of Qatar funded Daesh, which then invaded Syria in an effort to topple Assad. Recall that Hillary’s plan was to join Daesh in this fight, starting with the institution of a “no-fly” zone which would have put Pindostan into direct conflict with Russia. So it’s abundantly clear that Hillary Clinton was set to use Pindosi military assets at the behest of the Toads, first for regime change in Syria, and then in their confict with Yemen as the next logical target. It also emerged that Hillary’s right hand woman Huma Abedin has had ties to the Muslim Brotherhood which still haven’t been investigated. Note that turncoat shill Walnuts McCain chastised Michele Bachman for pointing this out, which should tell you something. In addition, former Muslim Brother Walid Shoebat said in an interview with FrontPage Magazine:

The Abedins for decades were actually serving a foreign entity, the Toad Ministry of Islamic Affairs, and not Pindosi Democracy as Pres Obama stated.

So given the Toad/ Clinton connection, many found it surprising that Donald Trump didn’t touch on much of it during the election. Instead, he harped on the fact that the wealthy oil nation doesn’t “pay their fair share” for Pindo troops in the region, and criticized the Toads for not accepting Islamic Syrian refugees over concerns of terrorism. Going back to Jan 2016, Trump stated that he would prefer to “protect the Toads” in order to maintain regional supremacy over Iran, despite their notoriously deplorable treatment of women and gays. Lo and behold, we may have our answer as to why. Pres Trump met with “Bibi” Netanyahu in mid-February, and they discussed a coalition which included Egypt, the Toads, Kuwait, the UAE, Bahrain, Oman and Jordan, all assembled to fight Daesh and ‘curtail Iran’s regional ambitions.’ So Israel is bedfellows with less aggressive Islamic nations in order to prevent Iran from nuking Tel Aviv, and Donald Trump and Pindostan have been roped into it. It would also appear that in exchange for Pindo support, Netanyahu agreed to Israel backing off on settlements, with Donald Trump citing the need for the Israelis to “show some flexibility.” During a joint presser at the White House, Trump mentioned a peace deal in the works, though details were scant:

Bibi and I have known each other a long time, a smart man, great negotiator, and I think we’re going to make a deal. It might be a bigger and better deal than people in this room even understand. That’s a possibility.  So let’s see what we do.

This would suggest that Trump’s asking price for joining Israel’s coalition is that Israel lay off the OPT, which  Obama implicitly demanded in late 2016 when Pindostan abstained on an UNSCR demanding that Israel cease settlement activity. If Pindostan has been Israel’s puppet for some time, these recent moves by Trump and Obama could be interpreted as rebellious acts. In an interesting gesture of goodwill yesterday from the House of Toad, Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman called Trump a “true friend of Muslims.” A Trump senior advisor described the meeting as follows:

Although Washington and Riyadh have previously undergone a difference of opinion, the Tuesday meeting put things on the right track, and marked a significant shift in relations. The House of Toad does not believe that this measure is targeting Muslim countries or the religion of Islam.

Meanwhile, despite Trump and the deputy Crown Prince’s notably cordial meeting in the White House on Tuesday, in perhaps yet another act of rebellion against the Israel/ Toad/ etc coalition, Sec State Rex Tillerson gave the UN an ultimatum: Pindostan will leave the UNHRC unless they reform, kicking human rights violators such as China, Egypt and the recently-added Toads off the council. Interesting! On the one hand, Pindostan is now roped into a coalition with the Toads and Israel in order to keep Iran in check and on the other hand, we are now demanding the UN punish the House of Toad by kicking them off the HRC. Perhaps Trump is playing ball with Netanyahu, in the mutual interest of crippling Iran’s ability to develop nuclear weapons. Maybe he’s using the UNHRC ultimatum as a way to protest the Toads, while maintaining pressure on Iran. Or could it be that Trump knows the UN won’t kick any of the those countries off the corrupt and highly politicized HRC, giving Pindostan justification to completely sever ties with the organization. Wherever the truth lies, there are several dimensions to this chess game.

One Comment

  1. fump
    Posted March 17, 2017 at 1:44 pm | Permalink

    “Corrupt and highly politicized HRC” is another morsel of US propaganda. Watch the US UPR and you’ll see where that party line comes from: US discomfort with incisive criticism strictly based on human rights and rule of law. One of the reasons that barbaric nations wind up on the HRC is for acculturation: knuckle-draggers mix with more developed nations and learn not to crap on the rug. One of the reasons members come and go is for routine rotation of regional representatives. US Glavlit organs get whatever propaganda mileage they can from changes in HRC composition, casting everything that happens as well-deserved repudiation or an outrage. That’s why the US went crazy when they got squeezed off the HRC in 01, and got squeezed off the ILC in 06. That actually was a rebuke: the US knuckle-draggers’ blatant contempt for rule of law just tore it.

    The US tries to negate critical review in charter bodies as attacks by dictators or enemies. They have a harder time with treaty bodies, which are staffed by internationally-preeminent experts who act in their personal capacity and not for a state. That’s why the media never ever links to the Conclusions and Recommendations of the Human Rights Committee, the Committee Against Torture, or the Committee to End Racial Discrimination.

    Now, the Secretariat really is corrupt and politicized; the US corrupted and politicized it themselves. Shirley Hazzard is great on this. But the UN is not a monolith. UN organizations vary considerably in capacity and integrity.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s