Revelations of No Collusion Is Not News
The_Real_Fly, Zero Hedge, Mar 19 2017
Ahead of the FBI director’s testimony in front of Congress this week, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes confirmed that there weren’t any links between “the Russians” and The Trump campaign. But that isn’t news and many on the right are applauding this ‘revelation’ as if it somehow vindicates Trump from a crime he never even committed. More to that end, Nunes is suggesting there was Russian meddling in the elections, a fact that has never, ever, been confirmed. Moreover, there are no links that can be proven between Wikileaks and Russia. Nunes said:
I’ll give you a very simple answer. No. Up to speed on everything I have up to this morning, no evidence of collusion. The one crime we know that’s been committed is that one: the leaking of someone’s name. That’s what we’re trying to get to the bottom of. Were there any other names that were unmasked, leaked and leaked out?
What exactly are the establishment shills mad about? What is the nexus of their anger? They’re still mad that one of their own, John Podesta, was revealed to be a corrupt operative, cavorting with other corrupt DNC official who used the media as an arm of the Demagog Party. Instead of addressing “Russian hacking” when the leaks were coming out, they waited until people forgot the details of the revelations, and now they obfuscate what “Russian meddling” means. It means John “Has a Map that Seems Pizza-Related” Podesta’s email box. At the end of the day, they do not like their laundry being aired out in public, they do not like “Pizzagate” accusations, and they certainly do not like the fact that these emails might have contributed to Trump’s victory. In sum, there aren’t any ties between Russia and Trump because the Russians didn’t leak the emails to Wikileaks. White hats inside the CIA did.