i don’t mind being repetitious in a good cause

Exposing Shabby Intelligence
Philip Giraldi, AmConMag, Mar 23 2017

There is a perception among some of the public and within the alternative media that Pindostan’s burgeoning national security state is a monolith, a collective entity pursuing its own interests regardless of what is good for the country or its people. From both progressives and conservatives who mistrust the government, I often hear comments such as, “Once in the CIA, always in the CIA,” as if onetime employment in the agency forms an unbreakable bond. Those familiar with both the national security community and the peace movement are aware that something like the reverse is true. Individuals who were attracted to careers in intelligence, law enforcement or the military are often sticklers for doing what is right rather than what is expedient. That often puts them at odds with their political masters, leading sometimes to resignations and a resulting over-representation of former national security professionals in the anti-war movement. One manifestation of this is an organization of former national-security officers including myself called Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity. VIPS was founded in 2003 out of revulsion on the part of many former officials over the shabby intelligence that was driving the decision to invade Iraq. The group includes officials from the whole alphabet soup of national security: CIA, NSA, FBI, FSO and DOD.

VIPS’ emergence and its ongoing letters of protest on national security policy reflect a reality going back to the early debates surrounding the government’s stealthy escalation of the Vietnam War and its woeful handling of that conflict, ending in a humiliating defeat. The lies that led to that Vietnam experience produced one of the first well-known rebels against intelligence corruption. Sam Adams, a CIA analyst who was assigned to the agency’s Vietnam desk in 1965, observed that the strength estimates for the North Vietnamese Army and Vietcong guerrillas consistently underreported the true strength of the enemy. This led to a prolonged conflict with Army and White House officials, as well as with Adams’s own bosses, all of whom promoted the false notion that the Vietnam challenge was a limited insurgency easily defeated, a fabrication intended to ensure popular support for the conflict. Though Adams was eventually forced out of the agency, he continued to expose how intelligence had been hijacked to suit a political agenda. He served as a witness in the trial of Daniel Ellsberg, the man behind the Pentagon Papers revelations. He wrote about the Vietnam “cover-up” and spoke to the House Intelligence Committee’s Pike Commission, which credited his allegations.

Today there are many former national-security officials in the mold of Sam Adams. For many, the disillusionment with the corruption of intelligence and betrayal of national security began with Iraq. CIA officers in the clandestine service such as European Division chief Tyler Drumheller pushed hard against D/CIA George Tenet and the White House, insisting that field reporting demonstrated that Iraq had no WMDs. Drumheller also dismissed “Curveball,” the German-Iraqi source of the false intelligence that Iraq was building mobile BW labs, saying the source was merely “a guy trying to get his green card essentially, in Germany, and playing the system for what it was worth.” CIA analysts also sought to expose false claims that Iraqi intelligence officials had met with aAQ. Senior State Dept officials John Kiesling, John Brown, and Ann Wright resigned over the march to an avoidable war. For others, increasing governmental attacks on the Constitution proved decisive. NSA officer Tom Drake went through channels after he learned the agency was illegally collecting information on Pindosi citizens in violation of the Fourth Amendment. He was joined by former NSA officers William Binney, Kirk Wiebe and Ed Loomis. Their efforts were rebuffed by the government. Despite whistleblower protections, Drake later was charged under the Espionage Act. 

The large numbers of former footsoldiers in the national-security establishment who are now opposed to the warfare state should be an eye opener for many Pindos, suggesting that there is no “high confidence” among many of those who are actually best positioned to know the truth regarding Faschingstein’s perpetual warfare policies. Which brings us back to VIPS and the dissident former national security officers who have found a home there. One is Tom Drake, who was involved from the start, as was Ray McGovern, a former senior CIA analyst and presidential briefer. VIPS has produced 47 memos on national security policy. Its first official action was a Feb 2003 memo to Bush 43 condemning the UNSC speech by Sec State Colin Powell that established the pretext for invading Iraq. The memo said:

You would be well served if you widened the discussion beyond … the circle of those advisers clearly bent on a war for which we see no compelling reason and from which we believe the unintended consequences are likely to be catastrophic.

More recently, VIPS has raised serious questions about the conclusion of Pindo intelligence agencies that Pres Putin ordered “Russian hacking” designed to destabilize Pindo politics and if possible put Donald Trump in the presidency. The group called on Pres Obama to release solid evidence of this, even if it creates difficulty for ongoing intelligence operations. The former security officials suggested the evidence released by the government thus far “does not pass the smell test,” and they noted particularly the lack of any public evidence linking the Russians to WikiLeaks, which published the bulk of the information in question. The VIPS statement addressed to Obama said:

We urge you to authorize public release of any tangible evidence that takes us beyond the unsubstatianted, ‘we-assess’ judgments by the intelligence agencies. Otherwise, we … will be left with the corrosive suspicion that the intense campaign of accusations is part of a wider attempt to discredit the Russians and those like Mr Trump who wish to deal constructively with them.

The VIPS statement didn’t get much attention. Indeed, such warnings from former intelligence, security, law enforcement and military personnel are largely frozen out of the establishment media. When VIPS presents its annual Sam Adams award for integrity in intelligence, the recipients get more media attention in Europe than in Pindostan. Rarely do the 50-plus associates of VIPS appear in the Pindo mainstream media, although they are frequently interviewed by the foreign press, particularly in Western Europe. The government also does its best to repress any dissident opinion by requiring many former intelligence and law enforcement personnel to have their writings reviewed by security officers prior to publication. The reviews can take months, make no effort to accommodate publishing deadlines, and often result in a heavily redacted text that is unreadable. The government sometimes strikes back in less subtle ways. Ray McGovern’s 2006 return of his Intelligence Commendation Medal over reports of CIA torture led to a provision in the Intelligence Authorization Act of 2007 enabling Congress to strip retirees of their pensions. Pushback from former national security officials is a good thing for the country and the agencies once served by these dissidents. Just as the Founders envisioned a citizen army so the defense of the nation would be in the hands of the people, a national-security structure responsive to responsible dissent should be cherished. The Obama administration, to its discredit, routinely punished legitimate whistleblowers and covered up its misdeeds through invocation of the state secrets privilege. We can hope that the new Trump administration will have the wisdom and confidence to call off the dogs.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s