Video Shows Tampering with “Evidence” of Syrian CW Attack
Theodore Postol, Zero Hedge, Apr 15 2017
This is my third report assessing the White House intelligence Report of April 11, 2017. My first report was titled A Quick Turnaround Assessment of the White House Intelligence Report Issued on Apr 11 2017 about the Nerve Agent Attack in Khan Shaykhun, Syria and my second report was an Addendum to the first report. This report provides unambiguous evidence that the White House Intelligence Report (WHR) of Apr 11 2017 contains false and misleading claims that could not possibly have been accepted in any professional review by impartial intelligence experts. The WHR was produced by the NSC under the oversight of the National Security Advisor, Lt-Gen H R McMaster. The WHR asserts that it reviewed commercial video evidence and concluded that sarin came from the crater next to a man. Other video frames show unprotected workers in the crater showing no evidence of sarin poisoning at the same time the dead birds are being packaged. The URLs to this and a related video are above.
The evidence presented herein is from two selected videos which are part of a larger cache of videos that are available on YouTube. These videos were uploaded to YouTube in the time period between Apr 5 2017 and Apr 7 2017. Analysis of the videos shows that all of the scenes taken at the site where the WHR claims was the location of a sarin release indicate significant tampering with the site. Since these videos were available roughly one week before the White House report was issued on Apr 11, this indicates that the office of the WHR made no attempt to utilize the professional intelligence community to obtain accurate data in support of the findings in the report. The video evidence shows workers at the site roughly 30 hours after the alleged attack that were wearing clothing with the logo “Idlib Health Directorate.” These individuals were photographed putting dead birds from a birdcage into plastic bags. The implication of these actions was that the birds had died after being placed in the alleged sarin crater. However, the video also shows the same workers inside and around the same crater with no protection of any kind against sarin poisoning. These individuals were wearing honeycomb face masks and medical exam gloves. They were otherwise dressed in normal streetwear and had no protective clothing of any kind. The honeycomb face masks would provide absolutely no protection against either sarin vapors or sarin aerosols. The masks are only designed to filter small particles from the air. If there were sarin vapor, it would be inhaled without attenuation by these individuals. If the sarin were in an aerosol form, the aerosol would have condensed into the pours in the masks, and would have evaporated into a highly lethal gas as the individuals inhaled through the mask. It is difficult to believe that such health workers, if they were health workers, would be so ignorant of these basic facts. In addition, other people dressed as health workers were standing around the crater without any protection at all.
As noted in my earlier reports, the assumption in WHR that the site of the alleged sarin release had not been tampered with was totally unjustified, and no competent intelligence analyst would have agreed that this assumption was valid. The implication of this observation is clear: the WHR was not reviewed and released by any competent intelligence experts unless they were motivated by factors other than concerns about the accuracy of the report. The WHR also makes claims about “communications intercepts” which supposedly provide high confidence that the Syrian government was the source of the attack. There is no reason to believe that the veracity of this claim is any different from the now verified false claim that there was unambiguous evidence of a sarin release at the cited crater. The relevant quotes from the WHR are collected below for purposes of reference:
Pindostan is confident that the Syrian regime conducted a chemical weapons attack, using the nerve agent sarin, against its own people in the town of Khan Shaykhun in southern Idlib Province on Apr 4 2017. We have confidence in our assessment because we have signals intelligence and geospatial intelligence, laboratory analysis of physiological samples collected from multiple victims, as well as a significant body of credible open source reporting. We cannot publicly release all available intelligence on this attack due to the need to protect sources and methods, but the following includes an unclassified summary of the Pindo Intelligence Community’s analysis of this attack. By 12:15 PM local time, broadcasted local videos included images of dead children of varying ages. At 1:10 PM local, follow-on videos showed the bombing of a nearby hospital. Commercial satellite imagery from Apr 6 showed impact craters around the hospital that are consistent with open source reports of a conventional attack on the hospital after the chemical attack. Moscow has since claimed that the release of chemicals was caused by a regime airstrike on a terrorist ammunition depot in the eastern suburbs of Khan Shaykhun. An open source video also shows where we believe the chemical munition landed, not on a facility filled with weapons, but in the middle of a street in the northern section of Khan Shaykhun. Commercial satellite imagery of that site from Apr 6, after the allegation, shows a crater in the road that corresponds to the open source video. Observed munition remnants at the crater and staining around the impact point are consistent with a munition that functioned, but structures nearest to the impact crater did not sustain damage that would be expected from a conventional high-explosive payload. Instead, the damage is more consistent with a chemical munition. Russia’s allegations fit with a pattern of deflecting blame from the regime and attempting to undermine the credibility of its opponents.
Summary and Conclusions
It is now clear from video evidence that the WHR report was fabricated without input from the professional intelligence community. The press reported on Apr 4 that a nerve agent attack had occurred in Khan Shaykhun, Syria during the early morning hours locally on that day. On Apr 7, Pindostan carried out a cruise missile attack on Syria ordered by Pres Trump. It now appears that the president ordered this cruise missile attack without any valid intelligence to support it. In order to cover up the lack of intelligence to supporting the president’s action, the NSC produced a fraudulent intelligence report on Apr 11 four days later. The individual responsible for this report was Lt-Gen H R McMaster, the National Security Advisor. The McMaster report is completely undermined by a significant body of video evidence taken after the alleged sarin attack and before the cruise missile attack that unambiguously shows the claims in the WHR could not possibly be true. This cannot be explained as a simple error. The NSC Intelligence Report clearly refers to evidence that it claims was obtained from commercial and open sources shortly after the alleged nerve agent attack, on Apr 5 and Apr 6. If such a collection of commercial evidence was done, it would have surely found the videos contained herein. This unambiguously indicates a dedicated attempt to manufacture a false claim that intelligence actually supported the president’s decision to attack Syria, and of far more importance, to accuse Russia of being either complicit or a participant in an alleged atrocity. The attack on the Syrian government threatened to undermine the relationship between Russia and Pindostan, which is critical to the defeat of Daesh. In addition, the false accusation that Russia knowingly engaged in an atrocity raises the most serious questions about a willful attempt to damage relations with Russia for domestic political purposes. We repeat here a quote from the WHR:
An open source video also shows where we believe the chemical munition landed, not on a facility filled with weapons, but in the middle of a street in the northern section of Khan Shaykhun. Commercial satellite imagery of that site from Apr 6, after the allegation, shows a crater in the road that corresponds to the open source video.
The data provided in these videos make it clear that the WHR made no good-faith attempt to collect data that could have supported its “confident assessment.” that the Syrian government executed a sarin attack as indicated by the location and characteristics of the crater. This very disturbing event is not a unique situation. Bush 43 argued that he was misinformed about unambiguous evidence that Iraq was hiding a substantial store of WMDs. This false intelligence led to an attack on Iraq that started a process that ultimately led to the political disintegration in the Middle East, which through a series of unpredicted events then led to the rise of Daesh. On Aug 30 2013, the White House produced a similarly false report about the nerve agent attack on Aug 21 2013 in Damascus. This report also contained numerous intelligence claims that could not be true. An interview with Pres Obama published in the Atlantic Magaszine in Apr 2016 indicates that Obama was initially told that there was solid intelligence that the Syrian government was responsible for the nerve agent attack of Aug 21 2013 in East Ghouta, a Damascus suburb. Obama reported that he was later told by then-DNI Clapper that the intelligence was not solid. Equally serious questions are raised about the abuse of intelligence findings by the incident in 2013, such as how the White House produced a false intelligence report with false claims that could obviously be identified by experts outside the White House and without access to classified information. There also needs to be an explanation of why this 2013 false report was not corrected. Sec State Jackass Kerry emphatically testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, repeating information in this so-called ‘unequivocal’ report. On Aug 30 2013, Jackass made the following statement from the Treaty Room in the State Dept:
Our intelligence community has carefully reviewed and rereviewed information regarding this attack, and I will tell you it has done so more than mindful of the Iraq experience. We will not repeat that moment. Accordingly, we have taken unprecedented steps to declassify and make facts available to people who can judge for themselves.
It is now obvious that this incident produced by the WHR, while just as serious in terms of the dangers it created for Pindosi security, was a clumsy and outright fabrication of a report that was certainly not supported by the intelligence community. In this case, the president, supported by his staff, made a decision to launch 59 cruise missiles at a Syrian air base. This action was accompanied by serious risks of creating a confrontation with Russia, and also undermining cooperative efforts to win the war against Daesh. I therefore conclude that there needs to be a comprehensive investigation of these events that have either misled people in the White House or worse yet been perpetrated by people to protect themselves from domestic political criticisms for uninformed and ill-considered actions.
Aftermath of the car bombing of buses of Shi’ite DPs in Syria: