important, cos trump was perceived as contra CIA/ZOG etc (initially!)

Julian Assange strikes back at CIA Director and talks Trump, Russia, and Hillary Clinton
Jeremy Scahill, Intercept, Apr 19 2017

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is hitting back at Trump’s D/CIA Mike Pompeo following a speech last week in which Pompeo accused WikiLeaks of being a “hostile nonstate intelligence agency” operating outside of the protections of the First Amendment.“ Pompeo declared:

We can no longer allow Assange and his colleagues the latitude to use free speech values against us! To give them the space to crush us with misappropriated secrets is a perversion of what our great Constitution stands for! It ends now!

Speaking from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he has been living since June 2012, Assange said Pompeo appeared to be issuing a threat. He asked:

So how does he propose to conduct this ending? He didn’t say. But the CIA is only in the business of collecting information, kidnapping people, and assassinating people. So, it’s quite a menacing statement that he does need to clarify. The reason why Director Pompeo is launching this attack, is because he knows we’re in this series exposing all sorts of illegal actions by the CIA. Pompeo is trying to get ahead of the publicity curve and create a preemptive defense. We thought it was quite a weak speech in that it put Director Pompeo, it put the CIA, in a position where they looked like they were frightened and worried that we were the better intelligence service.

Assange was referring to WikiLeaks’ ongoing publication of secret CIA hacking documents as part of its “Vault 7” project.

Regarding Pompeo’s declaration that WikiLeaks was not entitled to First Amendment rights, Assange said:

For the head of the CIA to pronounce what the boundaries are, of reporting or not reporting, is a very disturbing precedent. The head of the CIA determining who is a publisher, who’s not a publisher, who’s a journalist, who’s not a journalist, is totally out of line.

In the wide-ranging interview, Assange discussed the allegations that WikiLeaks was abetted by Russian intelligence in its publication of DNC emails, his alleged relationship with Roger Stone and his newfound admirers on the right, from Fox News to Sarah Palin and Donald Trump. Assange said that if WikiLeaks had obtained a cache of RNC emails, it would have published those as well. He said:

Just imagine if WikiLeaks had obtained information that it knew was true about the Democratic party and corruption of the primary process, and it decided that it was not going to publish that information, but suppress it, it would be completely unconscionable. We specialize in really big scoops. You can’t go: “Oh, we have this massive scoop about corruption in the DNC. Now we need to balance this with a massive scoop about corruption in the RNC.” These things come along once every few years.

Questioned about WikiLeaks’s aggressive targeting of Hillary Clinton, Assange rejected the notion that he went after her for personal reasons. He said:

I’ve never met Hillary Clinton. I think I’d probably like her in person. Most good politicians are quite charismatic in person. In some ways she’s a bit like me, She’s a bit wonkish and a bit awkward. So maybe we’d get along.

CIA, FBI launch manhunt for leaker who gave top-secret documents to WikiLeaks
CBS News, Apr 20 2017

FASCHINGSTEIN — CBS News has learned that a manhunt is underway for a traitor inside the CIA. The CIA and FBI are conducting a joint investigation into one of the worst security breaches in CIA history, which exposed thousands of top-secret documents that described CIA tools used to penetrate smartphones, smart televisions and computer systems. Sources familiar with the investigation say it is looking for an insider, either a CIA employee or contractor, who had physical access to the material. The agency has not said publicly when the material was taken or how it was stolen.


  1. CuChulainn
    Posted April 20, 2017 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    Jeremy Scahill also was perceived as a dissident journalist

  2. niqnaq
    Posted April 20, 2017 at 1:35 pm | Permalink

    He covers for CIA, yeah. “Either Scahill is deliberately dumbing down the movie, or worse yet he genuinely doesn’t know this history and the characters behind it. Either way, as the film’s critics note, the CIA, the organization that has been the lynchpin of all such operations in the past and has a documented history of military assets for plausible deniability in denying involvement in such actions, gets off scot-free in this 90 minute “expose” of the war on terror, only being mentioned once or twice, in passing, with excessive focus on JSOC.”

  3. L
    Posted April 20, 2017 at 4:56 pm | Permalink

    Assange is not a ‘British Agent” but Boris Johnson is!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s