great quotes from carter page letter

The McCarthyism of Russia-gate
Robert Parry, Consortium News, May 7 2017

Congressional demands for personal and business information from several of Donald Trump’s campaign advisers demonstrate how the Russia-gate investigation continues to spill over into a new breed of McCarthyism infringing on civil liberties, including freedom of speech and freedom of association. The original thinking had been that congressional and other investigations would concentrate on specific concerns from alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 election, such as whether a Trump intermediary somehow conveyed purloined DNC emails to WikiLeaks for publication on the Internet. WikiLeaks denies getting the leaked emails from Russians, and the Trump campaign denies colluding with Russians, but Pres Obama’s intelligence chiefs claimed that Russian agents hacked the emails and then used intermediaries to get the material to WikiLeaks, although no real evidence of that has been presented publicly. However, instead of zeroing in on that central question, the Senate investigation appears engaged in a fishing expedition, looking at virtually every contact between Trump advisers and Russians who may or may not have ties to the government. The demands are so broad that they could entrap the targets for perceived obstruction of an official investigation if some name or contact is left off, intentionally or by accident. For instance, the Senate Intelligence Committee has demanded from ex-Trump foreign policy adviser Carter Page, who has extensive business dealings and personal contacts in Russia, the names and details of pretty much anyone he contacted over an 18-month period who could be a Russian official or somehow connected to a Russian business. In a letter dated Apr 28, the committee’s top Rethug, Richard Burr of North Carolina, and top Demagog, Mark Warner of Virginia, gave Page until May 9 to provide:

A list of all meetings between you and any Russian official or representative of Russian business interests which took place between Jun 16 2015 – Jan 20 2017. For each meeting listed, please include the date, location, all individuals present, and complete copies of any notes taken by you or on your behalf.

Further, the committee set a deadline of May 19 for Page to also supply:

A list of all meetings of which you are aware between any individual with the Trump campaign and any Russian official or representative of Russian business interests which took place between Jun 16 2015, and Jan 20 2017. For each meeting listed please include the date, location, and all individuals present.

By the same deadline, the committee demanded:

All communications records, including electronic communications records such as e-mail or text messages, written correspondence, and phone records of communications which took place between Jun 16 2015, and Jan 20 2017 to which you and any Russian official or representative of Russian business interests was a party. All communications records, including electronic communications records such as e-mail or text message, written correspondence, and phone records, of communications related in any way to Russia, conducted between you and members and advisors of the Trump campaign. All information regarding your financial and real estate holdings related to Russia between Jun 16 2015 and Jan 20 2017, including those financial securities or real estate holdings which you sold or from which you divested in that time period.

Similar information requests reportedly have been sent to other Trump campaign advisers, including Roger Stone, Paul Manafort and Michael Flynn. Given the extent of Page’s dealings in Russia, which included having lived there for several years, the broad information demand amounts to a perjury trap because even if Page tried his best to supply all the personal, phone and email contacts, he would be sure to miss something or someone, thus setting him up for prosecution for obstructing an investigation or lying to investigators. Also, since the Obama administration reportedly obtained a FISA warrant against Page last summer, the government may well have more complete records of Page’s contacts and communications than he would, thus putting him into even greater legal jeopardy for an omission. The FISA warrant was allegedly obtained in part because of a speech that Page delivered in Russia on Jul 7 2016, that was mildly critical of Pindosi foreign policy toward the countries of the FSU. Beginning in late July, that FBI investigation then expanded into a much wider probe of people connected to Donald Trump’s presidential campaign with possible links to Russia. In an article about the origins of the investigation of Page and other Trump advisers, the NYT characterized Page’s July speech to the New Economic School in Moscow as critical of “Pindosi policy toward Russia in terms that echoed the position of Pres Putin.” The NYT then quoted one line from the speech in which Page said:

Faschingstein and other Western capitals have impeded potential progress through their often hypocritical focus on ideas such as democratization, inequality, corruption and regime change.

The NYT article by Scott Shane, Mark Mazzetti and Adam Goldman added:

His remarks accorded with Mr Trump’s positive view of the Russian president, which had prompted speculation about what Mr Trump saw in Mr Putin, more commonly denounced in Pindostan as a ruthless, anti-Western autocrat.

In reality, Page’s speech was much more nuanced than the NYT presented. His central point was that the hasty transformation of the FSU from state-controlled to free market economies led to unintended consequences, including increased corruption. Page said:

As the state remained dominant and new markets were simultaneously established following the breakup of the Soviet Union, members of these societies devised other methods and means of survival through corruption. These approaches mirror several corrupt tendencies at times found in Western societies. Some may be clear-cut such as the Bernard Madoff scandal in financial markets and Enron in the energy sector, while others are more subtle such as the perceived societal injustices highlighted by the Occupy Wall Street movement.

In other words, Page’s comments fell well within a reasonable assessment of the troubles that have occurred within the countries of the FSU. Page also recognized that the West, despite its sometimes holier-than-thou attitude toward less-developed nations, has its own problems with both criminal corruption and the more subtle variety of Wall Street machinations. After all, the 2008 financial crisis stripped common citizens of both Pindostan & Eurostan of trillions of dollars in lost assets and costs from government bailouts. But note how the NYT characterized Page’s remarks as having “echoed the position of Pres Putin,” suggesting that Page, a former naval officer, was somehow demonstrating disloyalty. The NYT also suggested that Page’s opinions as expressed in his speech contributed to the Obama administration’s decision to seek and obtain a FISA warrant that allowed them government to monitor his communications as a suspected foreign agent. Normally, such intrusive government action against a citizen for expressing his opinions, whether they “echoed” the views of Pres Putin or not, would alarm defenders of civil liberties. However, since Page briefly served as a foreign policy adviser to Trump, and much of the civil liberties community has enlisted in the #Resistance to Trump over his presumed threats to civil liberties, there has been extraordinary silence about the McCarthyite treatment of Page and other Trump advisers.

Michael Flynn, who served briefly as Trump’s national security adviser, has already had a taste of how the government’s surveillance powers can entrap a citizen in a “process” crime, such as lying to investigators or obstructing justice. On Dec 29 2016, several weeks before Trump’s inauguration, Flynn – while vacationing in the Dominican Republic, took a phone call from Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak in which they apparently discussed mounting tensions between Faschingstein and Moscow, as Pindo intel surreptitiously listened in. Because Flynn was not officially part of the government at the time of the call, Obama admin boxtops at the DoJ created a pretext for a criminal investigation by citing the Logan Act, a law enacted in 1799 to prohibit private citizens from negotiating with foreign adversaries but never used to convict anyone, ever. The law also is of dubious constitutionality and was surely never intended to apply to a president-elect’s advisers. Based on that flimsy pretext, FBI agents with a transcript of the electronic intercept of the Kislyak-Flynn phone call in hand tested Flynn’s memory of the conversation and found his recollections incomplete. Flynn also has come under criticism for giving a paid speech in 2015 to a dinner in Moscow honoring the tenth anniversary of the Russian television station, RT. Under mounting media and political pressure, Pres Trump fired Flynn.

While one can legitimately criticize Flynn’s judgment, the larger civil-liberties issue surrounding the Russia-gate investigation is the prospect of criminalizing otherwise innocuous contacts with Russia and punishing Pindosi citizens for resisting the New Cold War. Many Demagogs, liberals and even some progressives appear excited over the prospect of wielding this new McCarthyism against Trump’s advisers with the hope that Russia-gate can be built up into a case for Trump’s impeachment. But the precedents that are being set could be very dangerous for the long term. If Pindosis can be put under invasive FISA warrants for going abroad and criticizing Pindo policies, or if intercepted phone calls can be used to test the memories of citizens during FBI interviews, many of the warnings from civil libertarians about the dangers of “war on terror” surveillance powers being applied more broadly may be coming true. After receiving the sweeping congressional demands for documents and other data, Carter Page, who is an oil industry consultant with numerous foreign contacts including in Russia, responded by taking note of the reported FISA surveillance of him, writing to Senators Burr and Warner:

I remain committed to helping the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in any way that I can. But please note that any records I may have saved as a private citizen with limited technology capabilities will be miniscule in comparison to the full database of information which has already been collected under the direction of the Obama Administration during last year’s completely unjustified FISA warrant that targeted me for exercising my First Amendment rights, both in 2016 as well as in years prior. As a starting point for this latest step in the witch hunt which you suggested per the cumbersome chores defined in your … letter, I would request that you please begin by sharing the same information which you currently have … Based on the database of my personal information already collected during the Obama Administration’s domestic political intelligence operations which reportedly began at some point last year, it seems clear that many of the weighty task you assigned will have already been largely completed. As a lone individual, I can assure you that my personal administrative capabilities pale in comparison to the clerical juggernaut represented by the numerous staff in the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the Pindosi Government which have heretofore been allegedly involved in this unscrupulous surveillance for many months on end.

Whether justified or not, the FISA surveillance of Page, and thus likely others whom he contacted, may create the basis for some kind of criminal charges against him. Other Trump advisers may be tripped up on various process crimes, such as failure to report properly under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), another law that gets enforced selectively, mostly against people without political pull. In an interview on Friday, Page told me that he was a small player who was innocent of violating any laws but who became an “obvious” target for the Obama administration’s effort to undermine the Trump campaign. He said:

I don’t have protection, and I have genuine, deep Russian connections. (There are) thousands of emails and hundreds of phone calls … It defies all logic and common sense.

But the reality of Official Faschingstein is that once momentum builds up around a “scandal,” someone has to get convicted of something, or all the Important People who have weighed in on the “affair” will look stupid. In Russia-gate, important principles about the right to dissent, the right to privacy and the right to associate freely are getting trampled. For more on this topic, see The Did-You-Talk-to-Russians Witch-hunt.

One Comment

  1. Posted May 9, 2017 at 2:26 pm | Permalink

    The Times article by Scott Shane, Mark Mazzetti and Adam Goldman

    standard configuration of shabbo clowns fronting for the jew anchor.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s