“corbyn is calling all our boys murderers,” says colonel blimp kemp

UKUSA mount damage control operation over Manchester bombing
Robert Stevens, May 30 2017

Recriminations between Britain and Pindostan over leaks from Washington in the aftermath of the May 22 Manchester suicide bombing have given way to combined damage control. There has been no crisis in UKUSA relations on this scale in recent memory. Pindo intelligence from the first moments leaked crucial details to the media about Salmand Abedi, the suicide bomber. PM May and Home Secretary Amber Rudd both demanded of Britain’s closest military and intelligence sharing ally that the leaks stop. As a result, Rex Tillerson flew to Britain on Friday and held a joint presser with Boris Johnson, saying:

We take full responsibility for that, and we obviously regret that that happened.

The conference was held after May met Trump at last week’s NATO summit in Brussels, during which she would have raised that the leaks were an existential threat to her government whose poll numbers were collapsing ahead of the June 8 snap general election. On Sunday, Trump, after stating that those who leaked the information would be “prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,” tweeted:

DHS Sec Kelly told NBC’s Meet the Press Sunday:

I believe when you leak the kind of information that seems to be routinely leaked, high, high level of classification … I think it’s darn close to treason.

Behind the leaks is no doubt the ongoing factional warfare within the Pindo ruling elite, giving the reference to treason an ominous coloration. Britain’s scathing criticism of Pindostan, even with their much-vaunted “special relationship” called into question, is because the leaks are so explosive and destabilising. The initial leaks set off further revelations, including by French intelligence, indicating that MI5 knew Abedi and allowed him to travel to Syria and Libya without hindrance. The May government’s own damage control operation has begun with the launching of two inquiries by MI5 into Abedi. The first, according to the Guardian, began last week on the spurious grounds of aiming “to quickly identify any glaring errors” regarding Abedi. The second is to “look at the decision-making around Abedi before his attack.” The Guardian reported a source who said:

The key question given what is now evident about the danger Abedi posed would be, would different decisions be made? The longer review will look at the processes and systems used to assess suspects and what was known about any of the other main conspirators.

It is already clear that what is being prepared is a cover-up. Abedi and his family were not only intimately known to British intelligence, but were used by them in 2011 as part of the British-backed regime-change operation that resulted in the overthrow and murder of Col Gaddafi. Rudd quickly gave her a seal of approval to the inquiries, Sky News Monday asked her: “Are you happy that MI5 should be investigating themselves?” She replied: “As a first step, it is absolutely right.” Rudd refused to comment on the information already available about Abedi and his family’s connections to British intelligence, saying:

There’s a lot of information coming out about what happened, how this occurred, what people might or might not have known … We shouldn’t rush to make any conclusions at this stage.

The damage control operation also requires a ratcheting up of political dissembling to divert the public’s attention from the Manchester atrocity and establishing the truth about who is responsible. To this end, the only issues of security the Tories are prepared to countenance discussion on is Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn’s alleged connections to Sinn Fein and the Irish Republican Army more than three decades ago! Government representatives and their media backers have in addition issued a series of hysterical anti-Corbyn diatribes, based around the accusation that he is a danger to national security, following a speech last Friday in which he suggested politely that Britain’s aggressive foreign policy was connected to the growth of terrorist attacks in there. Corbyn stressed this in order to persuade the ruling elite that what was required was not a retreat from foreign interventions, but a “smarter way to reduce the threat from countries that nurture terrorists and generate terrorism.” On Monday, the Daily Mail published an editorial that did not once reference the Manchester bombing just days earlier, but targeted Corbyn and Diane Abbott. Headlined “Corbyn, Abbott and a threat to our security”, it railed against “Corbyn’s attitude to terrorism that should ultimately disqualify him from ever being prime minister.” Speaking about deaths as a result of terrorism, which flowed from Britain’s centuries-long occupation of Ireland, the Mail declared:

Many victims and their families have been unable to move on. These are not trivial issues to be brushed aside. They are central to our national security.

The government has been joined in the attacks on Corbyn by Labour right-wingers, along with a coordinated offensive by sections of the military. This is an escalation of attacks on Corbyn first made when he became Labour leader and was met with comments from an unnamed “serving general” that there would be a “mutiny” if he was allowed to come to power, given his declared opposition to the Trident nuclear weapons system and his criticisms of NATO. The Sunday Express, under the inflammatory headline, “Corbyn is calling all Our Boys murderers,” aired the comments of Col Richard Kemp, who commanded British troops in Afghanistan. Kemp said:

It’s a despicable thing to suggest that, while they were risking their lives in Afghanistan, they were actually complicit in the terrorist act that caused the deaths of 22 innocent people. We must face the fact that Jeremy Corbyn as prime minister would simply aid our enemies. He would rather support the likes of Hamas, every bit as fundamentalist as Daesh (wrong – RB), than oppose these extremists.

General Lord Dannatt, former head of the British Army, said Corbyn was espousing “outdated left-wing views” and continued:

(This is an) extraordinary intervention, just three or four days after a terrorist outrage! Let’s not forget that this is the man who has admitted that if he became prime minister, he would never press the nuclear button, so our nuclear deterrent would be rendered utterly useless. For a country like Great Britain, one of the P5 & a leading major power within NATO and Europe, it is very isolationist to say we are not going to get involved. There will be circumstances in the future where we’ll just have to get involved.

The government is covering up everything it can and throwing dirt at its opponents to prevent any genuine examination of the Manchester bombing. But this is not a scandal that is so easily swept under the table. That night saw 22 people killed, including many children. Many more are still critically injured. Yesterday it emerged that Tony Walter, a 52-year-old man who worked at a legal firm in London, killed himself at home within hours of Abedi’s bombing. Walter was a survivor of the London terrorist bombings of Jul 2007, in which 52 people were killed. He was within feet of one of the bombers when he detonated an explosive device on a Tube train after it left Edgware Road station.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s