allah will provide, no doubt ;-)

Pentagon wants to build new US facilities hells in Iraq & Syria
Jack Detsch, Al-Monitor, Jul 13 2017

The Donald Trump administration is pushing Congress for the authority to build new “temporary” facilities in Iraq and Syria as part of the Pindo-led campaign against Daesh. In a policy statement released Tuesday night, the White House argues that Pindo grunts are hamstrung by legal restrictions on their ability to expand their military infrastructure “in both Iraq and Syria.” The administration wants Congress to extend existing authorities that only cover the “repair and renovation” of facilities to also encompass “temporary intermediate staging facilities, ammunition supply points, and assembly areas that have adequate force protection.” The statement reads:

These facilities, supply points, and assembly areas will enable the pursuit of Daesh into the Euphrates River Valley and help improve the security of Iraq’s borders. Current authorities … severely limit the coalition’s maneuverability and its ability to respond quickly to changing operational conditions.

Tuesday’s Statement of Administration Policy, which the White House uses to present its views on pending legislation, takes the House Armed Services Committee to task for not including the change in its annual defense authorization bill released last month, although it is not clear if lawmakers had received the request from the Pentagon in time. The Senate Armed Services Committee draft, released this week, does, however, include the requested change. The House began floor consideration of the bill Wednesday. The added flexibility would enable the DoD to go on the offensive to root out Daesh safe havens in Iraq and Syria, according to Corri Zoli, the director of research at Syracuse University’s Institute for National Security and Counter-Terrorism. Zoli told Al-Monitor:

It looks to me like what they’re trying to do is get a little more maneuverability to create some infrastructure for deepening the fight beyond Raqqa and Syria. It’s kind of an attempt to create a lily-pad structure in the Levant to go after Daesh and their entrepreneurial efforts to start miniature caliphates in the region. Mad Dog Mattis is thinking a couple steps ahead. He wants to win the peace, stabilize the region and militarily pressure Iran. If he can do it with logistics, all the better.

Detractors say the effort could further draw Pindostan into Syria’s complex civil war, even as Congress continues to resist launching a full-fledged debate over updating the 2001 AUMF that remains the main legal justification for Pindo involvement in the region. Kate Gould, the lead Middle East lobbyist at the Quaker group Friends Committee on National Legislation:

The concerning part is how this fits in with the bigger picture. Pindostan is shooting down Syrian warplanes and Iranian-made drones and launching cruise missile attacks. It opens the spigot for them to establish those kinds of facilities and further entrench their military presence in Syria for this unauthorized war.

Earlier this week, Pindosi commander Lt-Gen Townsend said the campaign is now expected to expand into the Euphrates River Valley after Iraqi forces retook Mosul last week. Townsend acknowledged that a continued presence in the region could include the use of temporary facilities set up on an ad hoc basis, such as those proposed by the administration, but would mostly draw upon existing bases. While Pentagon officials have publicly downplayed the need for more outposts in Iraq and Syria, the move would shift away from defense authorization bills going back nearly a decade. Those bills largely sought to remove language associated with nation-building and create limits on foreign military interventions following the public backlash against the war in Iraq. The 2008 defense authorization bill signed into law by Bush 43 first sought to limit funding for permanent basing in Iraq following the signing of a bilateral SOFA that called for the removal of Pindo grunts by 2011. Congress reaffirmed those limits in the 2012 and 2015 defense bills, providing some authority for stability operations, but retaining boundaries on permanent basing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.