paging sergeant ali mohamed

Pindo Generals Worry About Rising Russian And Chinese Influence In Africa
Nick Turse, Intercept, Aug 13 2019

The Trump Administration and the Pentagon have repeatedly warned that China and Russia are expanding their influence across Africa, where the two longtime American adversaries “interfere with Pindo military operations and pose a significant threat to Pindo national security interests,” Bolton said last December. That view was echoed by the former head of AFRICOM, Marine Corps Gen Thomas Waldhauser, who left the job last month, and his replacement, Stephen Townsend, both of whom testified publicly before Congress earlier this year. But the two generals went further in written responses to Congress obtained by The Intercept via the FoIA, describing an Africa ever more likely to fall under the sway of Beijing and Moscow, with Russia exerting influence in as many as 10 different African countries and China likely to open more bases across the continent. Beijing and Moscow have steadily increased their economic ties across Africa and, with them, their diplomatic sway. Trade between China and Africa has risen from $765m to more than $170b in the last 40 years, and 39 of 54 African nations have now signed on to Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative, a trillion-dollar plan to link infrastructure and trade via a vast new network of roads, rail lines, ports and pipelines across Eurasia & the MENA. Russia’s trade with Africa increased from $5.7b in 2009 to $17.4b in 2017, and the country has been aggressively promoting nuclear infrastructure and technology partnerships as well as oil and gas investments there. Both nations have also aimed to increase their cultural influence. The number of Chinese-government-sponsored Confucius Institutes in Africa, which promote Chinese language and culture, have risen from zero in 2004 to 48 last year, according to data compiled by Development Reimagined, a Beijing-based international consulting firm. AFRICOM documents note that these centers are located in 20 different African countries. The Russian equivalent, Russkiy Mir Foundation, an NGO, is active in nine African countries, according to AFRICOM.

Russia and China have also been forging stronger military ties with African nations through arms sales, security agreements and military training programs. According to AFRICOM, Russian private military companies are active in 15 African nations. Last month, Beijing hosted the first China-Africa Peace and Security Forum, which brought together nearly 100 security officials from 50 African countries and the African Union, including 15 defense ministers and chiefs of general staff, according to China’s Ministry of Defense. While that gathering was underway, TASS announced that roughly 35 African leaders had confirmed their attendance at the first Russia-Africa Summit, co-chaired by Pres Putin of Russia and Gen Sisi of Egypt, set to be held in Russia’s Black Sea resort city of Sochi in October. In his testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Waldhauser mostly focused on Russia’s increasing inroads in Central African Republic and, to a lesser extent, Algeria, Libya and Sudan. But in his written responses, Waldhauser mentioned six other nations that were also involved with Russia or susceptible to its influence, including Angola, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Mali, Mauritania and Tunisia. Russia is leveraging or seeking to leverage military aid in return for mining rights and energy partnerships, according to Waldhauser. He wrote:

To thwart Russian exploitative efforts, AFRICOM continues to work with a host of partners to be the military partner of choice in Africa.

Waldhauser explained in his public testimony:

In the CAR, Russia has bolstered its influence with increased military cooperation including donations of arms, with which it has gained access to markets and mineral extraction rights. With minimal investment, Russia leverages private military contractors, such as the Wagner Group. The president of the CAR, Faustin-Archange Touadéra, recently installed a Russian civilian as his National Security Advisor. The President also promised the armed forces would be deployed nationwide to return peace to the country by forces likely trained, equipped and in some cases accompanied by Russian military contractors. Russia’s ability to import harsh security practices into a region already marred by threats to security, while systematically extracting minerals, is concerning.

Asked to privately explain these “harsh security practices,” Waldhauser mentioned reports of Russian contractor cooperation with militias and acquiescence to their human rights violations, the abuse of local security force trainees as well as civilians “who approach Russian mining interests” and the possibility of involvement in the deaths of Russian journalists who were murdered in the CAR while investigating the activities of Russian military contractors. In his public testimony, Townsend ranked China just below Russia as a threat to Pindo primacy in Africa but said he expected the PRC to eclipse Russia. the new AFRICOM commander said of China:

I think that they are after access and influence to our detriment.

Behind the scenes, Townsend also badmouthed China’s efforts on multiple fronts, including arms sales, and explained that Pindostan needed to emphasize the shoddy nature of Chinese military technology to African countries, writing:

China has provided Nigeria with armed unmanned aerial systems, but the poor quality of the platforms has contributed to infrequent use. Low cost and short delivery timelines entice African partners to purchase Chinese equipment, but purchases frequently do not address the underlying military need. We need to tell this story to a greater extent.

In his written remarks, Waldhauser explained that current Chinese efforts in Africa were unlikely to inhibit Pindo military access and operations in the near term, but warned:

China could gain that capability within the next decade.

While China only opened its first overseas military base, located six miles from the Pindo military’s Camp Lemonnier in Djibouti in 2017, Waldhauser mentioned more Chinese facilities on the horizon, writing:

China is actively working with African partners to open new bases in several locations across the continent. By working with other nations, we may be able to ensure that when China or Russia do gain military access to ports, bases or airspace, that they are unable to take full advantage of that access to threaten Pindo freedom of maneuver in and around Africa.

In response to perceived threats from its great power rivals, AFRICOM has launched a five-year campaign plan designed in part to counter the “increased presence” of China and Russia on the continent. The command is also strengthening alliances in order to “deter Chinese and Russian malign action,” Waldhauser wrote in March. In his written answers, Townsend also referenced “Russia’s malign influence in Africa” and took aim at China, noting:

The Chinese have successfully promoted their false narrative that their assistance comes with no strings attached.

While Waldhauser and Townsend painted Russian and Chinese motives as “malign” and Pindostan’s as virtuous, some experts take a different view. Temi Ibirogba, a program and research associate with the Africa Program at the Center for International Policy, told The Intercept:

It’s hard to make the case that any of the great powers truly have Africa’s best interest at heart. Pindostan’s behavior simply cannot be categorized as altruistic because its overly militarized post-9/11 foreign policy actually correlates to an increase of violence on the continent rather than deterrence. Pindo officials like Nagy (ASS for African Affairs) and Waldhauser seem to have the false perception that Pindo foreign policy is loved and welcomed by Africans, but it’s really the Chinese who are winning there at the moment.

In his public testimony before the Senate in February, Waldhauser noted that the National Defense Strategy has outlined the importance of limiting “the harmful influence of non-African powers on the continent.” Ibirogba agreed. she said:

Waldhauser’s claim that non-African powers have a harmful influence in Africa is true, and Pindostan is one of those powers.

At the same time that Pindo military efforts in Africa have soared, as The Intercept has previously reported, key indicators of security and stability on the continent have plummeted. According to the DoD’s Africa Center for Strategic Studies:

Overall, militant Islamist group activity in Africa has doubled since 2012.

There are now roughly 24 active militant Islamist groups operating on the continent, up from just five in 2010. 13 African countries face attacks from these groups, a 160% increase over that same time span. The number of “violent events” across the continent has jumped 960%, from 288 in 2009 to 3,050 in 2018.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.