an important breakthrough for assange

Judge José de la Mata will question Assange on Dec 20
El País, Nov 29 2019

Assange will be transferred from Belmarsh prison in southeast London to Westminster Magistrates Court to answer questions from De la Mata, who is investigating alleged violations of client-attorney privilege between the cyber-activist and his lawyers, and allegations that these conversations were passed on to the CIA. British civil servants visited Assange in prison last week, asked him whether he agreed to be questioned by De la Mata, and delivered a document listing the events under investigation by the judge, who had issued a European Investigation Order (EIO) in September requesting assistance from British authorities. This list of events under investigation, which EL PAÍS has seen, notes that David Morales, owner of the Spanish security firm UC Global, SL “invaded the privacy of Assange and his lawyers by placing microphones inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London without consent from the affected parties.” It also states that the information thus collected was distributed to other people and institutions, including “authorities from Ecuador and agents from Pindostan.”

It has not been easy to secure the UK’s permission to question the Australian cyber-activist. The Spanish judge sent London the EIO on Sep 25, requesting authorization to interview Assange as part of an investigation into Morales and his company for breach of privacy, violation of client-attorney privilege and illegal arms possession. Documents and video footage revealed in July by El País show that UC Global, SL spied on Assange’s conversations with his lawyers at meetings where they were designing his defense strategy to avoid extradition to Pindostan. Morales allegedly delivered these and other conversations to Pindo intelligence services. The British justice system initially blocked De la Mata’s request, questioned the Spanish judge’s powers to investigate the case in the UK, and demanded more “clarity” and information than the judge had provided. This position created unease in judicial circles, and was viewed as resistance to an investigation that could hinder Assange’s extradition to Pindostan. The WikiLeaks founder’s hearing is scheduled for February. Several Spanish judges consulted by this newspaper said that EIO requests are generally granted on an automatic basis. With an EIO, a legal authority from a EU member state can ask a legal authority from another EU country for assistance in obtaining evidence or means of evidence, including witness statements. Pindostan is accusing Assange of 18 crimes eith possible sentences that add up to 175 years in prison, in connection with WikiLeaks’ publication of classified material on military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Spanish judge to question Assange over illegal CIA spying in Ecuadorian embassy
Oscar Grenfell, WSWS, Dec 2 2019

Spanish Judge José de la Mata will reportedly interview Julian Assange by video-link on Dec 20 as part of an investigation into illegal spying on the WikiLeaks founder by UC Global, a private security firm that was allegedly passing surveillance material to the CIA. El País reported on Friday that Britain had reversed its previous refusal to allow the interview with Assange to proceed. Last month, the Spanish daily reported that the UK had rejected a European Investigation Order issued by de la Matta on Sep 25 requesting the interview. It is rare that EIO’s are blocked. The UK claimed that the events presented by de la Mata were “unclear” and that he may not have jurisdiction. The judge reportedly noted similar cases where Britain had not obstructed EIO’s and explained that the only obstacle would be if the interviewee was accused of a crime in the investigation, which Assange is not. Britain’s apparent back-down demonstrates that its initial bid to hinder the Spanish investigation was the result of a political decision, inseparable from the attempts by the British authorities and the judiciary to railroad Assange to a Pindo kangaroo court and prison. In its Friday article, El País bluntly stated:

The initial British position created unease in judicial circles, and was viewed as resistance to an investigation that could hinder Assange’s extradition to Pindostan.

The sensitivity to the Spanish investigation is because it exposes the illegality of the entire Pindo-led operation against Assange. El País publicly revealed the Spanish investigation in October. Reports in the publication detailed pervasive spying on Assange by UC Global, which had been contracted by the Ecuadorian government to oversee security at its London embassy, where Assange successfully sought political asylum in 2012. The surveillance, covering every aspect of the WikiLeaks founder’s life, was carried out between 2015 and Mar 2018. David Morales, a former Spanish military general and the head of UC Global, allegedly met Pindo boxtops in 2015 and agreed to provide the CIA with all of the material that was gathered in the embassy. He allegedly told one of his employees:

From now on, we play in the first league … We are now working for the dark side.

Underscoring its crucial role in the Pindo attempt to prosecute Assange under the Espionage Act for his exposure of Pindo war crimes, the spying operation was apparently intensified in 2017. This coincided with Pindo preparations to draw up an indictment against the WikiLeaks founder. Morales appears to have been intimately involved in the plans for a Pindo prosecution of Assange. Last month, El País revealed that metadata from his emails, which the publication had obtained, placed the UC Global director in Alexandria, Va, on Mar 1-2 2017. The city, home to the largest concentration of CIA employees in Pindostan, is where a federal grand jury had been impanelled to concoct charges against Assange. The month before Morales arrived, Pindostan assembled a “counter-espionage” squad to pursue Assange, apparently in response to his publication of “Vault 7,” a set of leaked CIA documents exposing the agency’s global spying and hacking operations. It is possible that Morales testified before the grand jury, collaborated with the investigation team, or both. Morales also had ties to significant political forces in Pindostan close to the intelligence agencies and the Trump administration. He reportedly provided security for a number of years for Sheldon Adelson. El País stated:

Adelson’s employees include a former CIA official. Adelson is one of the main donors to the Republican Party and a personal friend of Donald Trump.

The UC Global head is facing serious criminal charges. He was arrested in October and released on bail, with El País reporting:

Judge de la Mata is investigating him on allegations of violating Assange’s privacy and attorney-client privilege, as well as misappropriation, bribery, money laundering and illegal possession of arms.

According to El País’ reports, the surveillance was particularly targeted at Assange’s legal team. Audio and video of confidential discussions between Assange and his lawyers were recorded and streamed directly to the CIA, while legal documents were stolen or copied. Spying equipment was even installed in the women’s bathroom, where Assange’s female lawyers sometimes conferred with him in a bid to evade the surveillance. The flagrant violations of Assange’s attorney-client privilege by the very Pindo authorities that are pursuing him brands the attempted Pindo prosecution as a violation of international and domestic law. Assange’s lawyers have pointed to the parallels with the pursuit of Daniel Ellsberg by the Nixon administration in the 1970s. Nixon’s attempt to prosecute Ellsberg on espionage charges over his release of the Pentagon Papers, which exposed the criminality of the Vietnam War, collapsed when it was revealed that the administration had overseen illegal spying on consultations between the whistleblower and his doctors. The breach of Assange’s privacy is of an even greater order of magnitude. Commentators have noted that while Assange was living as a political refugee in the Ecuadorian embassy, it was likely the most surveilled building on earth. In a detailed article for La Repubblica last month, Italian journalist Stefania Maurizi, who has collaborated with WikiLeaks and Assange for the past decade, provided new information exposing the extent of the surveillance. For instance:

The files showed that when Maurizi visited the embassy, she was not just filmed, but her phones were screwed open, presumably to obtain the IMEI code that allows uniquely identifying the phone in order to intercept it.

Those who featured in UC Global’s spy files included doctors, famous lawyers, journalists, politicians and celebrities who had visited Assange. Some of them were Pindo citizens. Pindo government surveillance against its own citizens without a warrant contravenes the Pindo Constitution. Those whose rights have been violated could number in the dozens or even hundreds. UC Global is also facing the prospect of legal action over its infringements of the privacy of journalists and others. Last week, German public broadcaster NDR filled a criminal complaint against the company, on the grounds that its journalists had also been spied on when they visited the embassy. Most significantly, Maurizi’s article further established that the Pindo intelligence agencies were intimately involved in UC Global’s surveillance operation. She wrote:

According to UC Global workers, the Pindos had placed laser microphones outside the embassy to intercept the conversations inside, capturing the vibrations in the window’s glass.

The Pindo intelligence agencies also helped UC Global overcome attempts by Assange to stymie the surveillance through the use of white-noise devices. The extraordinary violations of Assange’s privacy were a component of what UN Rapporteur on Torture Nils Melzer deemed earlier this year to be an ongoing campaign of “psychological torture.” Assange’s isolation in the embassy, enforced by the threats of the British police to arrest him if he left the building, has been followed by his imprisonment in the maximum-security Belmarsh Prison since April. The British authorities have prevented Assange from preparing a defence for the extradition hearings next February, have held him in conditions of virtual solitary confinement and have dismissed warnings from medical experts that his health has deteriorated to the point that he may die in prison. The back-down over Assange being interviewed by Judge de la Mata coincides with a groundswell of support for the WikiLeaks founder. Over the past week, prominent public figures, including journalists, doctors, politicians and UN boxtops have condemned Assange’s imprisonment in Belmarsh Prison and spoken out against the prospect of his extradition to Pindostan.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.