the anti corbyn smear campaign

Someone Interfered In The UK Election, And It Wasn’t Russia
Caitlin Johnstone, Dec 13 2019

Ladies and gentlemen, I have here at my fingertips indisputable proof that egregious election meddling took place in the UK on Thursday. Before you get all excited, no, it wasn’t the Russians. It wasn’t the Chinese, the Iranians, Cobra Command or the Legion of Doom. I’m not going to get any Rachel Maddow-sized paychecks for revealing this evidence to you, nor am I going to draw in millions of credulous viewers waiting with bated breath for a bombshell revelation of an international conspiracy that will invalidate the results of the election. In fact, hardly anyone will even care. Hardly anyone will care because this election interference has been happening right out in the open, and was perfectly legal. And nobody will suffer any consequences for it.

Nobody will suffer any consequences for interfering in the UK election because the ones doing the interfering were extremely powerful, and that’s who the system is built to serve. As of this writing British exit polls are indicating a landslide victory for the Tories. Numerous other factors went into this result, including most notably a Labour Party ambivalently straddling an irreconcilable divide on the issue of Brexit, but it is also undeniable that the election was affected by a political smear campaign that was entirely unprecedented in scale and vitriol in the history of western democracy. This smear campaign was driven by billionaire-controlled media outlets, along with intelligence and military agencies, as well as state media like the BBC. Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has been described as the most smeared politician in history, and this is a fair description. Journalist Matt Kennard recently compiled documentation of dozens of incidents in which former and current spooks and military officials collaborated with plutocratic media institutions to portray Corbyn as a threat to national security. Journalistic accountability advocates like Media Lens and Jonathan Cook have been working for years to compile evidence of the mass media’s attempts to paint Corbyn as everything from a terrorist sympathizer to a Communist to a Russian asset to an IRA supporter to a closet antisemite. Just the other day the Grayzone documented how establishment narrative manager Ben Nimmo was enlisted to unilaterally target Corbyn with a fact-free Russiagate-style conspiracy theory in the lead-up to the election, a psyop that was uncritically circulated by both right-wing outlets like the Telegraph and ostensibly left-wing outlets like the Guardian. Just as Corbyn’s advocacy for the many over the plutocratic few saw him targeted by billionaire media outlets, his view of Palestinians as human beings saw him targeted by the imperialist Israel lobby, as exposed in the Al Jazeera documentary The Lobby. For a mountain of links refuting the bogus anti-Semitism smear directed at Corbyn, a lifelong opponent of anti-Semitism, check out the deluge of responses to this query I made on Twitter the other day. This interference continued right up into the day before the election, with the BBC’s political editor Laura Kuenssberg flagrantly violating election rules by reporting that early postal votes had been illegally tallied and results were “looking very grim for Labour.”

The historically unprecedented smear campaign that was directed at Corbyn from the right, the far-right, and from within his own party had an effect. Of course it did. If you say this today on social media you’ll get a ton of comments telling you you’re wrong, telling you every vote against Labour was exclusively due to the British people not wanting to live in a Marxist dystopia, telling you it was exclusively because of Brexit, totally denying any possibility that the years of deceitful mass media narrative management that British consciousness was pummelled with day in and day out prior to the election had any impact whatsoever upon its results. Right. Sure, guys. Persistent campaigns to deliberately manipulate people’s minds using mass media have no effect on their decisions at all. I guess that’s why that whole “advertising” fad never made any money. I am not claiming here that the billions of dollars worth of free mass media reporting that was devoted to smearing Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party had a greater effect on the election results than Brexit and other strategic stumbles in the party. I’m just saying that it definitely had a much greater effect than the few thousand dollars Russian nationals spent on social media memes in Pindostan, which the Pindo political media class has been relentlessly shrieking about for three years. To deny that a media smear campaign the size and scope of that directed at Corbyn had an effect is the same as denying that advertising, a trillion-dollar industry, has an effect. Which means that plutocrats and government agencies indisputably interfered in the British election, to an exponentially greater extent than anything the Russians are even alleged to have done. Yet according to British law it was perfectly legal, and according to British society it was perfectly acceptable. It’s perfectly legal and acceptable for powerful individuals to have a vastly greater influence on a purportedly democratic election than any of the ordinary individuals voting in it. A free and healthy society would not work this way. A free and healthy society would view all forms of manipulation as taboo and unacceptable. A free and healthy society would not allow the will of members of one small elite class to carry more weight than the will of anyone else. A free and healthy society would give everyone an equal voice at the table, and look after everyone’s concerns. It certainly wouldn’t tolerate a few individuals who already have far too much abusing their power and wealth to obtain even more.

The anti-Semitism accusations against Corbyn: A witch-hunt in the service of imperialism
Jean Shaoul, WSWS, Dec 13 2019

In the final days of the election campaign, Labour’s right-wing ramped up its fraudulent anti-Semitism campaign against party leader Jeremy Corbyn. The aim of this political destabilization operation has been to prevent an election victory that would take him to No 10 and to then engineer his subsequent removal. It followed a relentless campaign that started as soon as Corbyn became leader in 2015, when the Blairites, acting with the Conservative Party, the media, the military and intelligence establishment and the Israel lobby, denounced not only Corbyn’s but all left-wing opposition to Israel’s brutal suppression of the Palestinians as anti-Semitic. The witch-hunt centres on a concerted attempt to equate opposition to Zionism and the colonial policies of the Israeli state with hatred of the Jewish people in general and the infamous and reactionary anti-Semitism of the Nazis in particular. The Netanyahu government does not represent the Jewish people who live in Israel, let alone the Jewish people all over the world. It is the political voice of a section of Israel’s financial elite, and a proxy of the Trump administration in Pindostan. Similarly, the Jewish organisations that back the anti-Corbyn frenzy have no claim to represent Jewish opinion in Britain. The campaign is spearheaded by Labour’s Blairites, the Jewish Labour Movement (JLM), Labour Friends of Israel (LFI), the Community Security Trust (CST), funded by the Conservative government to the tune of £65.2m since 2015, the pro-Tory Jewish Chronicle and their allies.

Last week, the JLM, a pro-Israel affiliate of the Labour Party, leaked its own 53-page submission to the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), accusing Labour of the “corrosive disease” of institutional racism and being “a welcoming refuge for anti-Semites.” It alleged that the Corbyn-led Labour Party was “no longer a safe space for Jewish people or for those who stand up against anti-Semitism” and that 47% of British Jews would consider leaving the country if Corbyn was elected. Backed up by a corporate media aided and abetted by the BBC, the JLM has for four years mounted a ferocious campaign over an alleged “Labour anti-Semitism crisis” to the extent that, as academics Greg Philo and Mike Berry noted in a survey they undertook for their book Bad News for Labour, on average respondents estimated that 34 percent of Labour members had been accused of anti-Semitism, more than 300 times larger than the true figure. According to Labour Party records, there were few accusations of anti-Semitism among its 500,000 members, just 0.08% of the membership. Anti-Semitic views, held by 4% of Britons, are far more likely to be found in right-wing than in left wing circles, a recent Economist survey noted. The campaign escalated after the pro-Israel lobby forced the Labour Party to adopt a highly controversial—and non-legally binding—definition drafted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), whose examples of anti-Semitism included criticism of Israel. Last August, the EHRC opened an investigation into whether the Labour Party had broken the law in relation to anti-Semitism, the degree to which the party had implemented the recommendations made in the reports on anti-Semitism by Baroness Royall, the Home Affairs Select Committee and in the Chakrabarti Report, its processes for handling discrimination and the appropriateness of its responses to complaints of unlawful acts. The EHRC is not expected to report until the beginning of next year. The pro-Tory Daily Telegraph obligingly gave over five pages to the JLM’s allegations conflating opposition to Israeli policies towards the Palestinians with anti-Semitism.

The JLM repeated numerous anti-Semitic remarks and accusations whose authenticity and origins have never been substantiated. It asserted that anti-Semitic abuse had become a common experience for Jews attending local party meetings, citing an unbelievable claim by one person of experiencing 22 separate instances of abuse at constituency meetings, including being called “Tory Jew,” “child killer” & “Zio scum,” and being told that “Hitler was right.” In another equally unbelievable incident, said to have occurred at last year’s Labour Party conference, a Jewish member reported sharing a breakfast table with two other delegates who both agreed Jews were “subhuman” and should “be grateful we don’t make them eat bacon for breakfast every day.” Targeting Corbyn, it reported that a former Labour Party staffer, who left before Labour established its procedures for investigating anti-Semitism, had stated that the party’s complaints unit had failed to act independently of the leaders’ office and alleged that his advisors had leaned on the unit to “take a lenient approach to anti-Semitism.” None of this constitutes “evidence” but hearsay that any court of law would dismiss out of hand. The phrases used are not common parlance anywhere other than in the lexicon of Britain’s far right, certainly not in the Labour Party. Crucially, the JLM said, this was because the Labour leader and his coterie “were guilty of similar behaviour.” While previously Labour’s right-wingers had claimed that Corbyn, a lifetime anti-racism campaigner, had tolerated anti-Semitism, now they are openly slandering him and his immediate circle as anti-Semites, citing 11 instances that relate to his pro-Palestinian stance.

The JLM has refused to campaign for Labour as long as Corbyn remains leader. This should come as no surprise. The JLM functions as a lobby group for Israel that works with the other pro-Zionist organisations such as the Labour Friends of Israel, the Community Security Trust, the Board of Deputies of British Jews and the Zionist Federation of the UK. Its members were implicated in the undercover plot by Israeli embassy staffer Shai Masot, revealed by Al-Jazeera ’s “The Lobby,” to discredit figures associated with the pro-Palestinian camp, to “take down” senior Conservative government minister Alan Duncan—perceived as hostile to Israel, and use allegations of anti-Semitism to blacken opponents of Israel’s brutal suppression of the Palestinians. Last week, Israel’s Foreign Minister Yisrael Katz, told IOF Radio:

I personally hope that he won’t be elected, with this whole wave of anti-Semitism. I hope the other side wins.

Israeli officials have frequently attacked Corbyn’s positions on Israel, the Palestinians and the BDS campaign. The Ministry of Strategic Affairs has held discussions on whether to allow him into the country if he is elected, in line with Israel’s law banning entry to proponents of BDS. Boris Johnson’s Conservative Party is much more acceptable to Israel. It was Johnson who, when foreign secretary, helped Israel cover up the plot by its embassy staffer Shai Masot, declaring the matter closed after an apology by the Israeli embassy. His action is in sharp contrast to his supposed outrage over unsubstantiated accusations of Russia’s attempts to interfere in Britain’s elections and plant fake stories in the media. Johnson’s Home Secretary Priti Patel is a former vice-chairperson of Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI). In 2017, she was forced to resign as a Sec State for International Development after reports emerged of 12 secret meetings she held with Israeli officials while supposedly on a family holiday. The meetings, arranged and attended by Stuart Polak who for 25 years headed the CFI, were a state mission that could not be publicly acknowledged. Patel visited the Syrian Golan Heights, illegally occupied by Israel since its capture in the 1967 War and lobbied to divert part of Britain’s international aid budget to support IOF operations in the Golan. In a further unprecedented development, in an editorial, the New Statesman, the house journal of the Fabian right, adopted the same stance as the JLM, writing of Corbyn:

His reluctance to apologise for the anti-Semitism in Labour and to take a stance on Brexit, the biggest issue facing the country, make him unfit to be prime minister.

The Jewish Chronicle has backed the anti-Semitism witch-hunt to the hilt, giving prominence to attacks on Corbyn by Johnson and former Labour MP and former JLM parliamentary chairperson Luciana Berger. Berger quit the Labour Party in February over Corbyn’s supposed support for anti-Semitism, to co-found the Independent Group, which she then left to join the Liberal Democrats. This week’s Jewish Chronicle included a lengthy interview with Johnson in which he declares that the “threat” from Corbyn is “very real” along with a full-page advert in which Johnson calls for a vote for the Tories. In addition, 15 former Labour MPs, more Blairite defectors who now form the Mainstream campaign group, published a full-page advert in regional newspapers across the north of England Wednesday, targeting marginal constituencies where Labour could lose seats. They urged voters to reject Corbyn, calling him a threat to national security and saying:

Despite what Jeremy Corbyn says about anti-Semitism, we need to accept that most Jewish people have well-founded fears about what Labour has become.

A few weeks ago, the Murdoch-owned Times published the accusation by Britain’s chief rabbi, Ephraim Mirvis, a Johnson supporter, that Corbyn was “unfit for high office,” the first time a serving chief rabbi has ever publicly voiced his opinion about the contenders in a general election. He warned that the election result would serve as a measure of Britain’s “moral compass.” Justin Welby, the archbishop of Canterbury and leader of the Church of England, entered the fray, tweeting about the “deep sense of insecurity and fear felt by many British Jews.” This McCarthyite campaign is orchestrated directly by the Trump administration in Pindostan. Last June, Sec State Pompeo warned that Washington would not allow a Corbyn-led Labour government to take office and would “push back” to prevent it. He was caught on tape telling the CPMAJO, in response to a question about whether, if Corbyn was elected, he would be willing “to work with us to take on actions if life becomes very difficult for Jews in the UK?” Pompeo replied:

It could be that Mr Corbyn manages to run the gauntlet and get elected. It’s possible. You should know, we won’t wait for him to do those things to begin to push back. We will do our level best … It’s too risky and too important and too hard once it’s already happened.

This anti-Corbyn campaign is “push-back” in action. None of this would have been possible without Corbyn’s craven submission to Labour’s right-wing in the name of preserving party unity. Despite hundreds of thousands of people joining or rejoining the party in the belief that he would bring about a change in Labour’s policies, he has refused to mobilise workers and youth behind any of the causes he formerly supported and given in on every occasion to the right-wing’s demands, without even the semblance of a fight. Never once did he defend his own supporters, including Ken Livingstone, Marc Wadsworth, Jackie Walker and Chris Williamson, who were expelled or forced to resign from the party over false accusations of anti-Semitism. Instead, he has now apologized repeatedly for a supposed failure to deal rigorously and speedily with anti-Semitism. This must be a wakeup call for the working class and youth to intervene directly, not to save the Labour Party, which is beyond saving, but to wage ideological war against the right-wing political conspirators and their attempt to portray opposition to Israeli repression and war crimes as anti-Semitism.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.