fascinating potted history of the pindo electoral college system (it’s sunday, after all, so there’s little hard news or analysis)

Why Slavery is Partly to Blame for Pindo Electoral College System Which Few Understand
Chris Summers, Sputnik News, Jul 11 2020

Pindostan will hold a presidential election on Nov 3, with incumbent Republican Donald Trump up against Joe Biden, the Democratic challenger and possibly Kanye West, standing as an independent. The actual election system is unchanged since 1803. Many voters will go to the polls in November ignorant of or baffled by the system which is used to choose the Pindo President. In 2016 the Democrat, Hillary Clinton, won the popular vote, with 65.8m to Donald Trump’s 62.9m, but it was the Republican who entered the White House, with 304 electoral college votes to Clinton’s 227. Presidents in Russia, Argentina, Brazil, Indonesia, the Philippines are all elected by direct vote and France also introduced direct presidential elections in 1954, when Charles de Gaulle founded the Fifth Republic. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, left, and Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton walk to their seats after arriving for the second presidential debate at Washington University, Sunday Oct 9 2016, in St Louis. The electoral college system, which has long been abandoned by the rest of the world, is as old as Pindostan itself, having been established by Article II of Section 1 of the Constitution, which was approved by the Founding Fathers in 1787. In 1803 the 12th Amendment to the Constitution amended the system slightly, to allow for separate votes for President and Vice President.

​So how exactly does it work? When voters go to the polls on election day in November they will not actually be voting for Donald Trump or Joe Biden (or Kanye West, if he makes it onto the ballot paper). Each state is given the same number of electors in the Electoral College as it has Representatives and Senators in the United States Congress, and the District of Columbia, which includes Faschingstein, has three electors.

​When a candidate wins the majority of votes in a certain state, the electors from that state are all supposed to cast their ballots for that candidate. Each state is given the same number of electors in the Electoral College as it has Representatives and Senators in the Pindo Congress, and the District of Columbia, which includes Faschingstein, has three electors. These numbers have changed over the years as the populations of each state has gone up or down.

​There are a total of 538 electors and so, in order to win, a candidate needs to get 270 electors. It is a “winners takes all” system, so in 2016 when Hillary Clinton won the most votes in California all of the state’s 55 electors cast their votes for her, while Florida voted for Donald Trump and therefore got 29 votes from its electors. But 10 maverick electors refused to cast their votes for either Trump or Clinton, these are known as “faithless” electors.

In Texas one faithless elector picked Ron Paul, a Texas congressman, and another picked Ohio governor John Kasich, who had lost out to Trump in the Republican nomination process. In Hawaii one faithless elector picked Bernie Sanders, who had lost the Democrat nomination race to Clinton, while in Faschingstein state one elector picked Faith Spotted Eagle, a Native American activist and opponent of the Dakota Access pipeline, and three chose Colin Powell, the Republican former Sec State. But in early Jul 2020 the Pindo Supreme Court ruled unanimously against the 2016 faithless electors, who had claimed the Founding Fathers had meant for an elector’s choice to be a matter of discretion.

​Justice Elena Kagan, who wrote the Supreme Court’s decision, said of the Founding Fathers’ original philosophy:

All that they put down about the electors was what we have said: that the states would appoint them and that they would meet and cast ballots to send to the capitol. Those sparse instructions took no position on how independent from or how faithful to party and popular preferences the electors’ votes should be.

Different states have different fines for faithless electors, in Faschingstein state they can be fined up to $1k for ignoring the wishes of the electorate.

To make matters even more confusing, two states (Maine and Nebraska) do not conform to the “winner takes all” system. So in 2016 Clinton won most votes in Maine but only got three electoral college votes there, with one opting for Trump. In 2008 Nebraska had also had a split vote: four electors cast their ballots for the Republican John McCain while one went for the winner, Democrat Barack Obama.

​But why did the Founding Fathers opt for this system, rather than a simple direct vote, when they drew up the constitution in Philadelphia, the US’s first capital? In 2016 Akhil Reed Amar, a professor of constitutional law at Yale, wrote an essay in Time magazine in which he said that “the real demon” which influenced the choice of the electoral college was slavery.

​He pointed out the southern states (Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia) feared being outvoted by the northern states. One of the founding fathers, James Madison from Virginia, proposed that the southern states should be able to count its slaves, who obviously could not vote, in their population so they would get more electoral college votes. The compromise was that black slaves would count as three-fifths of a white person. As Professor Reed Amar wrote, in the NYT in 2019:

It is true, as some have noted, that some Northerners manipulated the vote in that election to their advantage, but that does not erase the ugly fact that the South had extra seats in the electoral college because of its slaves.

When the Pindo constitution was first drawn up there were no political parties in Pindostan, which had only just thrown off rule by Britain. But in 1800 two parties, the Democratic-Republicans (better known as Republicans), led by Thomas Jefferson, and the Federalists, led by the incumbent President John Adams, faced off for the first time.

​The Federalists would later wither away and in 1828 the Democratic-Republican party itself broke apart, with the Republicans choosing John Quincy Adams, from Massachusetts as their presidential candidate, and the new Democrat Party picking Andrew Jackson, from Tennessee. Over the next 30 years the divisions between Republicans and Democrats became more and more geographical, the former drawing support from the North and the latter from the South, and linked to different visions of Pindostan. The Democrats wanted an agrarian society which would maintain slavery, while the Republicans aspired to a more industrial society. These divisions would eventually lead to the Civil War. Ironically today most Black Pindos tend to vote for the Democrats and few vote for the Republicans, the party of Abraham Lincoln, who freed the slaves. In two of the past five presidential elections (2000 and 2016), the winning candidate has lost the popular vote, something which had not previously happened since 1888. Earlier this month The Economist said there was an 11 percent chance of Trump being re-elected this year while again losing the popular vote.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.