kit klarenberg: gladio meets integrity initiative

Where NATO-enabled fascist terror armies meet UK undercover police entrapment
Kit Klarenberg,, Nov 26 2020

For decades, UK undercover cops pushed activists to commit crimes to increase their perceived danger. Ironically, a tangled, tangential web links their activities to a NATO-backed programme to do the same on a European scale. The long-running practice of entrapment by undercover police has been dragged into the public spotlight by a recent statement to the Under-Cover Policing Inquiry (UCPI). On Nov 17, Dave Smith, a former construction worker and activist, gave a searing statement to the Inquiry on ‘blacklisting,’ a conspiracy in which big business and UK security agencies colluded to identify ‘troublemakers’ in workplaces and secretly ban them from employment. The statement also accused ‘Carlo Neri,’ a Special Demonstration Squad (SDS) officer, of multiple transgressions, including attempting to incite three individuals to firebomb a charity shop. ‘Neri’, whose real name was published online by an investigative journalist in 2019 as Carlo Soracchi, alleged the establishment was owned by Roberto Fiore, an Italian neofascist implicated in the 1980 Bologna massacre, with the proceeds used to fund a fascist training centre in Spain. Soracchi frequently told his comrades he felt very strongly about the bombing, which killed 85 people, including a three-year-old child, and wounded over 200, as his parents hailed from the region. At a drunken party at his North London home in 2003, Soracchi suggested to three antifa friends they visit the charity shop, which was just a few minutes walk away, to which they agreed. After returning, Soracchi said something along the lines of “it would be unfortunate if it was set alight.” One of the activists has since appraised this as an effort to “lead the horses to water and see if they would drink.” He raised the prospect with one of the activists on another occasion, driving them past the charity shop to show them “how to do” what he’d mooted, but it was never mentioned again thereafter, likely due to lack of interest. The individuals he’d seemingly tried to entrap were committed to non-violence.

Still, as wrongheaded as his attempts to stir pacifists to arson may have been, Soracchi’s suggestion the charity shop was a fascist clearing house was on the money. In 1978, Fiore founded Terza Posizione (Third Position), a far-right Italian political group, which served as the public, political wing of Nuclei Armati Rivoluzionari (NAR), a neo-fascist militant organization which killed at least 33 people between 1977 and 1981, the tail end of Italy’s blood-soaked ‘Years of Lead.’ In Jun 1983, a judge investigating links between the two groups was assassinated. After police found a large quantity of explosives and weapons in a local Terza Posizione office in the wake of the Bologna massacre, Fiore and 15 others linked to the bombing fled to London to escape justice. British security services may have secured their passage, and prevented their extradition subsequently. A 1991 European Parliament inquiry into racism and xenophobia noted Fiore had been an MI6 agent since the early 1980s. Upon arrival in ‘Perfidious Albion,’ Fiore set about establishing an extensive network of front organisations to fund his political activities, and founded International Third Position (ITP) with, among others, later-British National Party leader Nick Griffin. Extolling racial separatism, rural traditionalism and Catholic fundamentalism, ITP bought a remote Spanish village in 1997, to use as a summer camp for right-wing extremists, undoubtedly the site mentioned by Soracchi. It was later revealed the purchase was paid for with the proceeds from an organization run by Fiore called The Society of St Michael the Archangel, which purported to be an apolitical Roman Catholic philanthropic initiative and had many charity shops in the UK, eight in London alone.

Fiore’s voluminous business portfolio also included restaurants, Italian food shops, English-language schools, and travel-employment agency Meeting Point/Easy London. The company offered young Italians wanting to work and/or study in the UK capital a package deal comprising transportation, a well-remunerated job and plush central accommodation, for an attractive fee. When they actually reached London, though, they found themselves toiling in one of Fiore’s front enterprises for meagre wages, while paying a premium to stay in one of 1,300 slum dwellings he maintained, with tiny and overcrowded shared bedrooms, mattresses in corridors, and communal bathrooms used by up to 15 people. An army of violent skinheads managed the properties, administering late-night beatings to those unable to pay their rent on time, among other peccadilloes. In Feb 1994, 28 Labour MPs, among them Jeremy Corbyn, signed an early day motion criticising the then-Conservative government’s refusal to extradite Fiore. The motion noted his maintenance of a “Rachmanite housing scam,” the “strong likelihood” that profits from this activity contributed to “racist, thuggish activities” by organisations such as the BNP, and accused Whitehall of having “behaved disgracefully and against the national interest” in not deporting him and his “skinhead cohorts.” These endeavours were surely known about by British security services, and allowed to endure unmolested for many years, despite their flagrantly criminal character. Meanwhile, spycops surveilled, subverted and sabotaged an untold number of left-wing, progressive political groups which posed no risk to anyone’s health or safety.

While cleared in 1985 of direct involvement in the Bologna bombing, Fiore was convicted of subversive association in absentia and jailed for nine years due to his membership of NAR, reduced to five-and-a-half on appeal. Even this brief term was eventually cancelled under Italy’s statute of limitations, and he was able to return to his homeland in Apr 1999. The question of who or what was ultimately responsible for the train station massacre somehow remains unanswered four decades later. In the years following the bombing, a number of NAR operatives were prosecuted and sentenced for their apparent roles in the attack, although they and NAR denied all involvement, and most convictions secured were subsequently overturned on appeal. Suggestions of intelligence agency involvement have only gained in volume and credibility over the years, particularly in light of the exposure of ‘Operation Gladio,’ a clandestine NATO connivance under which state-sponsored fascist elements carried out false flag terror attacks and criminal acts as part of a “strategy of tension” across Europe, designed to discredit the left and justify ever-greater security measures, over the course of more than four decades. The central role of MI6 and the CIA in recruiting and managing the terrorists involved may explain how Fiore came to serve as an agent for the former. Members of Gladio’s Italian unit were also reportedly trained on British soil. These agencies were furthermore instrumental in the concealment of vast caches of explosives, weapons and ammunition in secret locations across NATO member states. In 1991, an Italian parliamentary committee concluded the explosives used in the Bologna bombing were drawn from one such Gladio arsenal.

Operation Gladio was uncovered as a result of investigations of the May 1972 Peteano bombing, in which five police officers were lured to investigate a suspicious parked car. It was packed full of explosives, which detonated when attempts were made to open its doors, killing three of the officers and seriously injuring the other two. Initially, it was claimed the explosive involved was a kind typically employed by communist guerrilla group Brigate Rosse. However, over the course of the inquiry, it was determined the material in fact hailed from a Gladio munitions dump located beneath a cemetery near Verona. The police explosives expert who’d alleged the attack was the work of Brigate Rosse was moreover found to be a member of Ordine Nuovo, the far-right terrorist group actually responsible. Ordine Nuovo operative Vincenzo Vinciguerra was determined to have planted the Peteano bomb, and jailed for life. Over the course of his trial, he alleged that “the Carabinieri, the Minister of the Interior, the customs services and the military and civilian intelligence services” had all accepted “the ideological reasoning behind the attack.” In later years, Vinciguerra laid bare the “strategy of tension” in stark detail. He said:

You were supposed to attack civilians, women, children, innocent people from outside the political arena. The reason was simple, force the public to turn to the state and ask for greater security. People would willingly trade their freedom for the security of being able to walk the streets, go on trains or enter a bank. This was the political logic behind the bombings. They remain unpunished because the state cannot condemn itself.

On Nov 22 1990, the European Parliament passed a resolution on the Gladio affair, noting that for over 40 years, “a clandestine intelligence and armed operations organization” had existed in European countries and “escaped all democratic controls,” having been “run by the secret services of the states concerned in collaboration with NATO.” The resolution stated:

Such a network may have interfered illegally in the internal political affairs of member states [and] may still do so. Military secret services (or uncontrolled branches thereof) were involved in serious cases of terrorism and crime. These organizations operated completely outside the law.

The UCPI has only just begun, and the files released and evidence from former spycops heard so far have related to the four years following the 1968 founding of the SDS. It’s abundantly clear, though, that from its very inception, the unit’s operatives weren’t passive participants in the groups they penetrated, but often instigators and organisers of highly provocative if not outright illegal activity, marshalling their surveillance targets to engage in subversive actions they wouldn’t normally have. This ethos endured for the 40 years the SDS operated, and no doubt informs British secret policing strategy and tactics to this day. In 2012, it was alleged Bob Lambert, who as ‘Bob Robinson’ infiltrated animal rights and environmental campaign circles during the 1980s, fathering a child with an activist in the process, planted an explosive device in a branch of British department chain Debenhams in Jul 1987. It was one of three bombs simultaneously detonated in Debenhams branches by Animal Liberation Front (ALF) activists, part of a crusade against the sale of real fur. ALF member Geoff Sheppard was responsible for planting another. He was caught red-handed months later as the group prepared for a second wave of arson attacks, and convicted. Sheppard recalls:

I wasn’t there when he targeted the store, because we all headed off in our separate directions, but I was lying in bed that night, and the news came over on the World Service three Debenhams stores had had arson attacks. I straight away knew Bob carried out his part of the plan. There’s absolutely no doubt in my mind Lambert placed the incendiary device. I specifically remember him giving an explanation to me about how he’d been able to.

In Dec 2014, Sheppard also claimed SDS officer ‘Matt Rayner’ encouraged and abetted other illegal activities he’d initially been unwilling to carry out. It was a “determined, cynical and targeted effort” which included coaxing him to buy a shotgun. ‘Rayner’ offered to fund the purchase, and asked him for instructions on how to make a bomb, testing the ‘recipe’ at least once. In May 1995, police raided Sheppard’s home and found a shotgun, cartridges and components for making an incendiary device. He was jailed for four years, an appeal to overturn his conviction is ongoing. At least 83 convictions of activists spied upon by undercover officers are currently under review, a great many others have been quashed since the spycops scandal erupted in 2010. In July this year, the Metropolitan Police confirmed ‘Rayner’ was subject to a criminal investigation. On top of discrediting and disrupting the political groups they target, and ridding activist movements of particularly ‘troublesome’ individuals, playing agent provocateur creates threats to the public and contributes to a climate of fear, in which people “turn to the state and ask for greater security,” in Vincenzo Vinciguerra’s phrase. As such, spycops can be considered just one strand in a wider “strategy of tension” which is waged without citizens’ knowledge or consent, or any democratic oversight whatsoever.

And what of Fiore? After returning to Italy, he founded the far-right Forza Nuova (New Force) party, which he leads today. In 2008, he took over the European Parliament seat of Alessandra Mussolini, granddaughter of Benito Mussolini. In a perversely ironic twist, in March 2020 Fiore announced he was bringing legal action against the Metropolitan Police over Soracchi’s attempts to cajole activists into firebombing his property, on the basis he was “victim of a serious crime.” It’s unclear how far this effort has progressed since.

Browder now claims Russians tricked a British bank into closing his account
Kit Klarenberg,, Nov 26 2020

Convicted fraudster Bill Browder, now a prominent anti-Russia agitator in the West, is accusing British bank NatWest of closing his account due to a dastardly “black PR” campaign waged against him by malign actors in Moscow. Browder’s allegation, reiterated unquestioningly by The Guardian, has emerged via a report issued by opaquely-funded neoconservative think tank the Henry Jackson Society (HJS). The wealthy financier made a fortune in Russia, initially during the wild 1990s. However, like many foreigners and indeed locals operating in the country at the time, he found conditions tougher when regulation and oversight was tightened up in the 2000s. He was found guilty of evading around $40m in taxes, and accused of siphoning off money to offshore accounts. In 2005, he was banned from Russia, just a year after he had written supportively about Vladimir Putin’s government in The Moscow Times. After this reversal in fortunes, he quickly turned against the Kremlin and reinvented himself as a vocal opponent of the president he’d once praised.

The HJS report warns that ‘Black PR,’ an alleged practice said to be somehow exclusive to Russia, is seeping into Britain. It says it is used for discrediting individuals as part of political or business disputes, by creating or obtaining compromising material or by generating fake media reports on a particular individual or organization. The obvious implication is that never before have falsehoods been disseminated by powerful state and non-state actors in order to damage reputations throughout the country’s long, perfidious history. Quite how a domestically-directed Black PR campaign in Russia influenced a British bank to close Browder’s account is unclear. The veteran tax evader simply claims NatWest told him “outright” the closure was due to “Russian press reports.” Somewhat ironically, the same bank hit the headlines in 2016 when it shut down RT’s UK accounts, a decision reversed the following year. Buried at the very bottom of The Guardian’s article is a far more anodyne explanation, offered by a NatWest spokesperson, who says:

The accunt termination was simply a commercial decision, based on a number of different factors, all of which were considered extensively and with great care. The matter was subsequently revisited and the decision remained, with appropriate notice periods given.

For over a decade, Browder has told a shocking story of corruption, fraud, and murder at the highest levels of the Russian state. It’s a tale he’s imparted across the world again and again, to journalists, lawmakers, human rights organizations and more. Overwhelmingly, Browder’s audiences have believed him, and in the process it’s been related in articles, books, reports and documentaries, and has influenced legislation and prosecutions in numerous countries. In brief, he claims state officials took over the Russian division of his company, Hermitage Capital Management, to carry out a massive tax scam, reaping $230m in the process.

According to Browder’s narrative, he set his friend Sergei Magnitsky, a tax adviser he falsely presents as a lawyer, on the case, to determine what had happened. The diligent sleuth uncovered the fraud, and as a result of alerting authorities, Magnitsky was jailed on bogus charges, tortured in prison in an attempt to make him retract his testimony, and ultimately beaten to death by guards for his courageous refusal. Outrageous stuff indeed, although those who don’t take Browder’s claims at face value and actually attempt to verify any aspect of his lurid narrative quickly find it unravels, as it’s a tangled web of lies, fabrications, distortions, exaggerations and libel. Nonetheless, it inexplicably and inexcusably took a decade for a mainstream journalist to conduct serious due diligence on his assertions. In Nov 2019, leading German news outlet Der Spiegel published a comprehensive demolition of the fable, savagely indicting Browder’s probity and integrity in the process. In the publication’s own words:

He has a talent for selling a set of facts so it supports his own version of events.

It was also the first time a major Western news outlet acknowledged Magnitsky was neither a lawyer nor a whistleblower. He was in fact an accountant, implicated in numerous crooked financial schemes benefitting Browder, who had been questioned and later arrested by police for these activities. Moreover, Der Spiegel revealed among other things how Browder had systematically misrepresented and even concocted evidence to further his claim that Magnitsky had been murdered. In an unguarded interview with the magazine, Zoya Svetova, a Moscow-based human-rights activist who’d investigated Magnitsky’s death in 2009, said there was no indication the accountant had even been specifically targeted for maltreatment. She said:

What sense would it make to murder him? Magnitsky did not reveal any secret. They wanted testimonies against Browder. That was the motivation. He should have accused Browder of not paying taxes. Magnitsky was a hostage. He himself was of no interest to them. They wanted Browder.

In response, Browder lodged a complaint with the German Press Council, accusing Der Spiegel of serious factual misrepresentation and defamation. In May 2020, the council rejected each and every one of his grievances in detail. The landmark article followed a similarly damning ruling in August by the European Court of Human Rights in the Magnitsky case. While it ordered the Russian state to pay his relatives $37.5k due to a failure to protect Magnitsky’s life and health, having identified shortcomings in the medical treatment he was provided in prison, no mention of murder or even unlawful killing was made in the judgment. Conversely, the court comprehensively dismantled suggestions Magnitsky had been a whistleblower, rejecting claims his arrest and subsequent detention were “manifestly ill-founded.” The judgment states:

The Court reiterated the general principles on arbitrary detention, which could arise if authorities had complied with the letter of the law but acted with bad faith or deception. It found no such elements in this case. The decision to arrest him had only been made after investigators learned he’d previously applied for a UK visa, booked tickets to Kiev, and hadn’t been residing at his registered address. Furthermore, the evidence against him, including witness testimony, had been enough to satisfy an objective observer that he might have committed the offence in question. The list of reasons given by the domestic court to justify his subsequent detention had been specific and sufficiently detailed.

The judgment, ignored entirely by the mainstream media, was nonetheless hailed by Browder as a “resounding victory.” It wasn’t the first time the financier, who renounced his US citizenship in order to not pay taxes in his home country, completely inverted the substance of a court ruling for his own purposes. In 2012, Russian tax investigator Pavel Karpov, who Browder alleged had orchestrated the $23m tax fraud and played a pivotal role in Magnitsky’s arrest, imprisonment and death, sued his accuser for defamation in London. The presiding judge ruled British courts had no jurisdiction over the matter, as Karpov wasn’t a British citizen and had no reputation in the country which could be damaged by Browder’s allegations. However, the verdict also made clear the billionaire had “not come close to pleading facts which, if proved, would justify the sting of the libel,” and Karpov had received “a measure of vindication” as a result. While acknowledging that only a court order, which wasn’t granted, could prevent a repetition of Browder’s libel, the judge keenly emphasized that if he continued to publish “unjustified defamatory material” about Karpov, the court wouldn’t necessarily be powerless to act. Browder still claimed the judgment was a vindication of his allegations, and various media outlets framed it as a humiliating defeat for the claimant.

In light of so much readily available information that detonates Browder’s narrative, it’s an enduring mystery how journalists continue to be so comprehensively hoodwinked, although it can at least be partially explained by the sizeable chunk of his immense personal fortune he invests in a vast media operation, cultivating journalists and employing an army of public-relations professionals to pump out endless coverage promoting him and his story. Intriguingly, the UK FCO’s secret military intelligence operation Integrity Initiative may form part of this effort. The organization’s internal files, leaked by Anonymous in Nov 2018, reveal that Integrity Initiative, among other things, maintains clandestine global networks of journalists, academics, military and intelligence operatives to spread pro-Western propaganda and encourage more aggressive policies toward Moscow. These networks are dubbed ‘clusters.’ Browder is listed at the very top of Integrity Initiative’s UK cluster, while his Hermitage colleague Vadim Kleiner is also named. It may be significant that HJS report was authored by Andrew Foxall, director of the think tank’s Russia and Eurasia Studies Centre. In Nov 2018, he was also lead author of a widely-ridiculed report issued by the organization, which stated half the Russians residing in the UK, around 75k people, were intelligence operatives. Integrity Initiative staffer Euan Grant lists Foxall as a key contact, boasting of receiving “personalised invites” from him to “Russian-linked” HJS events, and being a member of a “small invitation-only group” run by HJS associate fellow John Hemmings. In another, Grant refers to media outlets with which Integrity Initiative “has particular links” and can provide “proactive contributions in advance, or at near real time.” They include the BBC, Times, Telegraph and Guardian. A cynic might suggest these passages could potentially shed some light on why both The Guardian and HJS’ report on Black PR allege Sergei Magnitsky was murdered for uncovering a vast tax fraud carried out by authorities.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.