nazi britain: boris’ covid bonanza

The Coronavirus Crisis: Boris Johnson’s Excuse for Bad Government
Sam Bright, Byline Times, Nov 30 2020

“Everyone’s a socialist in a pandemic,” wrote NYT columnist Farhad Manjoo on Mar 11, as COVID-19 emerged as a scientific, social and economic catastrophe, the likes of which hadn’t been seen since the Spanish Flu pandemic of 1918-20. In the UK, this maxim has to some extent been proven accurate. As last week’s Spending Review demonstrated, the Government has deployed its vast resources to prop up businesses, stave off unemployment and formulate an occasionally competent public health response to the crisis. This year alone, the Government is set to borrow £400b, equivalent to around 20% of the national income. This has been a revolutionary endeavour for a political party that has been historically reticent about the merits of Government spending. And, when the Government has acted promptly, intelligently and generously, it has managed to insulate the public from some of the worst excesses of the pandemic. The labour market in the UK is relatively stable, compared, for example, with the 40m Americans who filed for unemployment in the months up to June. However, this generosity and efficiency has not extended to all aspects of Government policy. In many fields, whether consciously or not, Boris Johnson’s administration has used COVID-19 as an excuse to restrict rights and withhold support from those most in need. Take the asylum system. As questioned about the issue in the House of Commons:

I think we do more than our fair share while protecting vulnerable people.

The Government has pledged that it will restart the schemes in the new year, yet this will provide little solace to the 20k Syrians alone who were due to be resettled in the UK in 2020. Ironically, the dormancy of the resettlement programmes also exposes the duplicity of Home Secretary Priti Patel. She has been fanning faux outrage about “illegal” Channel-crossing asylum-seekers, while blocking one of the few, official routes for people to seek refuge in the UK. Another policy booted into the long-grass has been the Government’s long-awaited review into the social care sector. Teetering on the precipice of crisis for years, social care providers are now in free fall. It has been estimated that 20k care home residents in the UK have died from COVID-19, out of 70k total deaths from the disease, while staff have suffered from a shortage of protective equipment. Despite this, the Dept of Health and Social Care has confessed that its proposals to reform the sector will not be released until next year. COVID-19 has been used as an “excuse for procrastination,” according to public uncertainty. Indeed, on the one hand, the Government has committed to delivering tens of millions of vaccine doses at lightning speed next year. On the other, it is pushing through a Brexit policy that is predicted to cause widespread chaos at ports, delaying the supply of medicines and related equipment. This contradiction should raise a giant red flag in Downing Street, yet is seemingly of little concern to a Government that specialises in crisis-creation.

As national self-destruction continues apace in the form of Brexit, threatening to undermine human rights and economic opportunities, so too has the Government used the pandemic to starve some people of support. Last week, the Court of Appeal ruled that the Education Secretary Gavin Williamson acted unlawfully in removing safeguards for children during the early stages of the pandemic. Williamson’s department diluted or removed, on a temporary basis, 65 legal protections designed to protect children in care in England. This included changes concerning the timescales for social worker visits, six-monthly reviews of children’s welfare, and independent scrutiny of children’s homes. Carolyne Willow, director of the children’s rights charity Article 39, told the Guardian:

The Government’s actions were shameful, both in the scale of the protections they took away from very vulnerable children in England and the way they went about it.

But children in care are not the only ones to have borne the brunt of the Government’s callous Coronavirus policies. The Coronavirus Act, the legislation passed in March that formalised the daily social restrictions we now all face, also institutionalised discrimination against the mentally and physically disabled. The Act, which creates “the potential for violations to fundamental human rights,” according to HRW, made it easier for people to be detained on mental health grounds, removing the provision for a second medical opinion. It also reduces the responsibilities of local councils towards disabled people and the elderly, essentially suspending their duties to carry out care assessments of new needs, and/or to reassess individuals if their circumstances change. Councils are likewise not required to prepare or review care and support plans, the details of a person’s care arrangements, once someone with a disability is discharged from a residential facility. Shadow Minister for Disabled People Vicky Foxcroft wrote in the Independent in late September:

The legislation pulled away safeguards and weakened standards for some of the most marginalised people in our country just at the very moment they most needed help

Foxcroft’s article was part of a lobbying effort from the Opposition, urging the Government to reinstate the above provisions, while Parliament debated whether to renew the Coronavirus Act, something that is required every six months during its two-year lifespan. While Health and Social Care Secretary Matt Hancock listened to concerns over mental health detention, the Government refused to reverse its dilution of disability rights. Of course, all of this fails to mention the showpiece of Government incompetence during the Coronavirus pandemic: its inefficient, expensive private sector procurement splurge. Dispensing with normal procurement practices, permitted during an emergency, the Government has awarded £10.5b in contracts without competition. Deals worth hundreds of millions have been awarded to firms with links to the Conservative Party, while two National Audit Office reports have laid bare details of the biased, dysfunctional procurement process. In many respects, Johnson’s Government has acted against its instincts during the pandemic, implementing an agenda that would at any other time be labelled as radically socialist. But, beyond its headline-grabbing pseudo-socialism, the Government has carelessly and more characteristically eroded the rights of the marginalised.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.