other takes on the navalny demonstrations

Post-journalism
Xymphora, Jan 24 2021

It is instructive to contrast the mythological ‘interference’ of Russia in Assholian politics with the actual interference of Assholia in Russian politics: Gross Interference”: Russia Livid That US Embassy Posted Times & Locations Of Navalny Protests” (Durden). The (((media))) is also greatly exaggerating the size of the protests. They weren’t nothing, but they also weren’t substantial. There were a lot of convenient camera angles with accompanying statements about how large the crowds were. Bryan MacDonald thread on the numbers (Saint Petersburg was biggish, but not in comparison to the size of the city). MacDonald’s tweets cover violence from both sides. There were probably Assholian assets serving as agents provocateurs. Thread by Terrell Jermaine Starr on Navalny. I am always going to be amazed at the sheer randomness about who is going to be picked as the next Imperial tool. From ‘Nalvany’ to ‘Guido,’ it is difficult to keep the names of the lackeys straight, but it indicates how little the Assholian functionaries actually care about their assets. Were I to give them more credit, it may be that they make these errors as a way of signaling to the lackeys just how unimportant to the Empire they really are, so they better keep performing.

“Gross Interference”: Russia Livid That US Embassy Posted Times & Locations Of Navalny Protests
Tyler Durden, Zero Hedge, Jan 23 2021 – 14:50

Earlier on Saturday as pro-Navalny protests began “sweeping across Russia”, as CNN dubiously put it (which have not numbered more than in the thousands in any one place) we asked the question: are we witnessing the start of a manufactured ‘color revolution’ targeting Putin and the ruling government under the banner of the Navalny ‘nerve agent’ saga? Of course, it’s too early to tell. But already on ‘day one’ of major protests across several Russian cities the US Embassy in Moscow is highlighting the protests and their locations on its website. While ostensibly the embassy is directing citizens to “avoid” these demonstrations, given the possibility of violence, the State Dept-sponsored public notice lists in surprisingly specific detail the location and times of a dozen protests in large cities. Russia’s foreign ministry is livid, and has charged the US Embassy with giving unnecessary “cover” to the ‘unauthorized’ protests. Essentially the Kremlin is alleging that the ‘notification’ is a US Embassy ploy to actually publicize and promote the protests.

Here’s the full Russian foreign ministry response to the provocative US Embassy webpage as featured in TASS:

Russia plans to view the attempts of the US embassy in Moscow to “cover” the unauthorized rallies in Russia as interference in internal affairs. The Russian Foreign Ministry wrote on its Telegram channel on Friday: All that coincides with Washington’s provocative doctrinal guidelines to encourage ‘protests in the countries with unwanted governments.’ Any attempts of this ‘coverage’ of unauthorized rallies will be regarded as gross interference in our country’s domestic affairs and will lead to a corresponding response. The information posted on the US embassy’s site on the times and venues for the unsanctioned rallies goes beyond concern for US nationals in Russia.

The chaotic scene in central Moscow on Saturday after jailed Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny called on supporters to take the streets:

Below is the remarkably detailed information posted to the US Embassy in Moscow’s website. The “Demonstration Alert” provided the list of planned protests a full day ahead of the demonstrations actually taking place:

  • In Moscow, demonstrators plan to gather near Pushkin Square at approximately 1400 and march towards the Kremlin.
  • In St Petersburg, demonstrators plan to gather near Senate Square at approximately 1400 and march towards Gostiny Dvor (located on Nevsky Avenue).
  • In Yekaterinburg, demonstrators plan to gather at the entrance to Dinamo Stadium, 12 Ulitsa Yeryomina at approximately 1400 and march along the embankment of the city lake toward the Drama Theater.
  • In Perm, demonstrators plan to gather at the intersection of Komsomolskiy Prospekt and Ulitsa Poliny Osipenko at approximately 1400 and march towards Komsomolskiy Prospekt and some other central streets.
  • In Chelyabinsk, demonstrators plan to gather at Slavy Boulevard at approximately 1400 and march towards Lenin Prospekt to Kurchatov Monument.
  • In Krasnoyarsk, demonstrators plan to gather in Krasnaya (Red) Square at approximately 1400 and march towards the downtown area.
  • In Novosibirsk, demonstrators plan to gather at 63 Krasny Prospekt, near House of Officers at approximately 1400 and march towards Lenin Square.
  • In Omsk, demonstrators plan to gather at Leningrad Square, at the intersection of Karla Marksa Prospekt and Ulitsa Maslennikova at approximately 1400 and march towards Sobornaya (Cathedral) Square.
  • In Vladivostok, demonstrators plan to gather at the Fighters for Soviet Power Monument on Svetlanskaya Street at 1400.
  • In Khabarovsk, demonstrators plan to gather at Lenin Square at 1200.
  • In Ulan Ude, demonstrators plan to gather at Teatralnaya Square at 1400.
  • In Irkutsk, demonstrators plan to gather at the Square on Ulitsa Uritskogo on the square near the consumer services center “Dom Byta”

Time for another US-sponsored Color Revolution in Eastern Europe?

Meanwhile…

Many commentators have pointed out that if the Russian Embassy in Washington DC had done the same thing related to either pro-Trump or BLM protests at any point, US leaders would explode in anger and there would be a flood of the usual denunciations of “Russian interference.”

Widespread arrests & dozens of police injured in pro-Navalny protests in Russia as organizers say MORE TO COME next weekend
RT.com, Jan 23 2021

600c757985f540158c68051aPhoto: Maxim Shemetov/Reuters

Thousands took to the streets of cities across Russia on Saturday as part of demonstrations organized by supporters of jailed opposition activist Alexey Navalny, as rallies in Moscow and St Petersburg descended into violence. Dramatic footage of authorities clashing with demonstrators in the capital has been shared widely online as Russia’s statutory jail watchdog put the number of arrests in Moscow at above 600. Riot police worked through the afternoon to disperse crowds from Pushkin Square, in the center of the city, as protesters scuffled with officers.

Lyubov Sobol, a close Navalny associate, was pulled out from a crowd of journalists by officers. She had previously been arrested on Thursday on suspicion of inciting protests. Also on Saturday, Yulia Navalnaya, the wife of the jailed Moscow protest leader, was taken into custody, posting a picture to Instagram from the police van. She was later released. As the numbers around Pushkin Square dwindled, some of the remaining contingent began attacking a car that was said to belong to the security services, punching, kicking and smashing its windows. Reports say that the driver had his “eye gouged out” by the mob. “Details are now being clarified,” a security agency official told RIA Novosti. A total of 39 officers in the city had been injured, although none seriously, a source told the news agency.

A man reported to be an anti-Navalny protester was filmed atop a lamppost in the square, having unfurled a banner critical of the opposition figure. Cheers were heard as a man from the pro-Navalny crowd shimmied up the pole and violently pushed him off, breaking part of the streetlight at the same time (below – RB).

Footage of a young boy being apprehended by officers was also widely shared, with many highlighting his young age and his determination to get away. A large number of young people appear to have been drawn to the gatherings after calls for support were aired in a number of viral videos on the streaming service TikTok. Russia’s Education Ministry had warned parents earlier this week of the risk of young people attending protests, telling them to keep them home and spend time as a family instead. While official estimates are yet to be released, eyewitnesses report police making arrests after asking protesters to disperse. According to the website of NGO OVD-Info, an opposition resource that has received Western funding, more than 2,500 were detained. Mass gatherings in most parts of Russia have been banned under rules aimed at preventing the spread of Covid-19. St Petersburg, the country’s second largest city, was also a flashpoint for violence, with the local Fontanka news site publishing footage that appears to show an elderly woman being kicked over by an officer after blocking his path during the detention of an activist. Another shocking clip showed a man approaching a traffic policeman, punching him squarely in the face and walking off as the victim lays on the ground. A second officer then attempted to apprehend the assailant.

Unrest in Vladivostok, seven hours ahead of Moscow, began earlier in the day. A video showed crowds of people wrestling with police in an attempt to prevent an activist being detained. Some officers lost helmets, while others were hit or pushed back.

Leonid Volkov, a close ally of Navalny’s who live-streamed commentary of the events as they unfolded throughout the day, said that fresh protests would be called for next weekend. Navalny has been jailed for 30 days after he allegedly breached the terms of a three-and-a-half year sentence, suspended for five years, when he lost contact with prison service authorities last autumn. He had been transferred to Berlin’s Charite hospital in a comatose state after what his supporters say was a state-sponsored assassination attempt with the nerve agent Novichok. The Kremlin has denied, and even mocked, these claims, with Peskov adding that Navalny has a “persecution complex” and allegedly compares himself to Jesus. The protests for his release have taken on an international dimension, with Russia’s Foreign Ministry accusing the local US Embassy of hypocrisy after its spokeswoman tweeted that the police response to opposition demonstrations was part of a “concerted campaign to suppress free speech [and] peaceful assembly.” Diplomats ridiculed the suggestion, pointing to the violent scenes that shocked the world earlier this month when supporters of former President Donald Trump stormed the Capitol building in Washington.

Apparent Anti-Navalny protestor pulled down from Moscow lamppost during rally for holding sign objecting to activist
RT.com, Jan 23 2021 14:19

A man at Saturday’s protests in Moscow was violently pulled off a lamppost after he seemingly held up a placard in opposition to anti-corruption activist Alexey Navalny. A video, shared widely on social media, shows four men climb up the lamppost to get the supposed anti-Navalny demonstrator down. In the clip, one man punches the protester, while another holds onto his leg, eventually dragging him down. The crowd responds with cheers. The protest, taking place in Moscow’s Pushkinskaya Square, was planned by supporters of Navalny after he was sentenced to 30 days in pre-trial detention on Monday. The Moscow government refused to authorize the march, citing regulations to prevent the spread of Covid-19, but preliminary numbers from observers suggest that tens-of-thousands of people attended anyway.

The Jan 23 Rally Of Navalnyists Ended In Complete Failure
Andrey Nazarov, Stalker Zone, Jan 24 2021

Liberal media trumpets the mass scale of illegal actions in support of Aleksey Navalny. But a more in-depth study of the issue allows us to conclude that support for the controversial blogger has decreased on the contrary. It makes sense to compare the event on January 23rd 2021 with the rally that took place on March 26th 2017. Both events are similar in many respects. Both back then and today the weather was similar, as well as the reasons for the protest. In 2017, it was the “Kirovles” case, and in 2021, it was a violation of the conditions of probation in the “Yves Rocher” case. Navalnyists spent about the same amount of time organising these rallies. But it turns out that the total number of participants in uncoordinated events across the country in 2021 was 5.5 times less than in 2017. This is despite the fact that over the past four years, Navalny’s team has released more than a hundred hours of various video content. The “Anti-corruption Foundation“ (recognised as a foreign agent) received more than 500 million rubles of so-called donations from western sponsors to its accounts. And the result has deteriorated. The inflation of views and the artificial output of the blogger’s videos in the trends of YouTube don’t help either. It is time for Navalny to think about how he will explain this situation to his western patrons, who have invested a lot of money in him. No matter how much the blogger excuses himself, his videos can only make an impression on still foolish schoolchildren, but he will not be able to deceive more adult people. The support of the liberal media, which also demonstrates bluster, does not help either. Navalny’s supporters chose an unfortunate time to hold January 23rd’s rally, if we consider it from the point of view of the election cycle of the autumn State Duma election. No one has been able to support a street protest for eight months. It turns out that there has been a false start.

About Operation “Navalny”
Dmitry Sedov, Stalker Zone, Jan 23 2021

The main task of the Joe Biden administration is to restore the image of “good old America,” destroyed during the preparation and holding of the presidential election. Without convincing Americans that “everything is going right,” America’s way out of a difficult economic and domestic political situation is difficult. Meanwhile, it is no longer possible to convince “one-story America” of the legality and correctness of the victory of the Democrats. After many proven cases of election fraud, after the censorship imposed on social networks, after the lack of reaction in the media to dirt, after the inauguration behind the backs of National Guard soldiers and barbed wire, Americans are unlikely to return to the peaceful life of the 1970s. America saw firsthand the work of the “deep state” and understood how this merciless machine works. The country will not be the same. With Biden, new winds blew. Bringing America back to the past is unlikely. Trump’s supporters have made a bet on continuing the fight. By the morning of Dec 21, Biden had repealed 20 of Trump’s executive orders, and on the same day, Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Green introduced a draft resolution to impeach President Biden. This is just the beginning. There is a protest against the first steps of the new President aimed at easing the rules of entry of immigrants from Islamic countries, the return of the US to the WHO, controlled by Bill Gates, returning to the Paris climate agreement, the termination of the wall on the border with Mexico, and a new regulation in favour of sexual minorities. The new US administration needs to shift the focus from domestic to foreign policy issues. When choosing an object in this direction, the centre of gravity has already shifted from China to Russia: business circles close to the new administration have an interest in protecting their business with China.

America has no business with Russia. The illusions of a part of Russian society about “democratic values,” the presence of pro-western forces among the intelligentsia and the media, the clumsiness of official bodies at the new and more complex stage of the information war make Russia easy prey in the eyes of the globalist ruling groups of the US. In this context, Operation Navalny is being deployed. The day before the inauguration, Joe Biden’s national security aide Jack Sullivan said:

The Kremlin’s attacks on Navalny are not only a violation of human rights, they are a speech against the Russian people who want to be heard.

Jack Sullivan speaks for the Russian people, as did the propagandists of the Third Reich. The US with renewed vigour declares itself as the “Empire of Good,” and in the place of the USSR, after a 30-year period of uncertainty, is the same “Empire of Evil,” which must be destroyed. They will not spare effort and money for this. Part of the losses (bribery of journalists, manipulation of social networks, etc) will be attributed to the European clients of the globalist ruling class. On Jan 21, the European Parliament adopted a resolution demanding the release of Navalny, the blocking of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline and tougher sanctions against Russia. The resolutions of the European Parliament are advisory in nature, but they are developed in consultation with the heads of state and indicate the state of mind of politicians in Europe. The European Union has actually stated that it does not consider Russian legislation worthy of respect. The Russian Federation should act, as under Kozyrev, under the leadership of western centres that regulate the course of affairs in our country, relying on the opposition, which honours the testament of Ostap Bender “Abroad will help us.”

Now abroad shows itself as the mastermind and organiser of the operation “Navalny.” The sequence of stages of the operation does not raise any questions:

  • Spamming social networks with the “recording” of a telephone conversation between Navalny and his poisoner from the FSB actualises the question of poisoning;
  • The “recovered” Navalny is sent to Russia with the expectation of his arrest;
  • The spamming of a pre-prepared film about “Putin’s palace“ is made to warm up the mood against the government;
  • In large cities, large street actions are being organised in support of Navalny, which are supposed to force the Russian government to capitulate;
  • A plan to tighten sanctions against Russia and partially isolate it internationally is being implemented.

Another stage may be an attempt to arrange a speech by Navalny from Germany at the upcoming UNGA on the issue of Russia’s use of WMDs, demanding the imposition of the broadest international sanctions on it. The first goal is to try to politically push the Russian Federation back to the state of the 1990s. If the Russian authorities resist these attempts, a course will be taken to destabilise and dismember the Russian Federation. Let’s pay tribute to the authors of the project: it is thoroughly prepared. Although there are shortcomings. For example, in the recording of “Navalny’s conversation with his poisoner,” a wall clock showing different times of the day falls into the frame. The text accompanying the video sequence from the film about the “palace” bears traces of machine translation from English, which will be confirmed by anyone who knows both languages well. Germany’s refusal to provide medical reports on the identification of Novichok in Navalny’s blood remains scandalous.

The weakest link of the project is Maria Pevchikh, who is not up to the level of training assigned to her role. The authors of the project keep her abroad, rightly believing that the FSB has questions for this lady, who recently appeared in the “Anti-corruption Foundation“ as if as a result of a circus trick. It is not at all funny and the remark of criminal psychologists that poisoning through codpieces bears the imprint of female psychology: with what fright did the men from the FSB poison this particular fragment of Navalny’s clothing? And the most disastrous of the last episodes of operation “Navalny” was an interview with Maria Pevchikh with the “Dozhd“ channel via video link, where she showed that she did not know the specifics of the work of the “Anti-corruption Foundation” and could not explain how the “Anti-corruption Foundation” had such comprehensive information about the “palace.” Her comment on the work on the film also looks funny: “As soon as Aleksey came out of the coma, he immediately said ‘We go to work,’ and we worked tirelessly for three months”. What could they do for three months in Berlin, renting a “palace” in Gelendzhik? Most likely, they ironed the machine translation of the comments to the film received from the Secret Intelligence Service. These flaws are very similar to the handwriting of the Secret Intelligence Service. However, this Service does not hesitate. They learned Bertolt Brecht’s rule very well:

The rams are marching in a row, beating the drums.
They fleece themselves.

Analysis Of Navalny’s “Palace For Putin” Film
Pravo-Zakon, Jan 24 2021

Putin’s Palace is officially a hotel complex near Gelendzhik, which belongs to the former chairman of the Board of Directors of Open joint-stock company “Novorossiysk Commercial Sea Port” Aleksandr Ponomarenko. Previously, the complex was owned by LLC “Azure Berry” and “Idokopas,” which were acquired by Ponomarenko. The transaction amount was $350m.

[10:45] “Putin personally distributed licenses (unfounded) to one-day firms (unfounded) associated with him and his friends (unfounded)“;

[10:54] “raw materials went abroad, firms did not receive money for it and products did not come by barter” – an unsubstantiated statement, Putin himself said that some firms did not supply food in full, but Navalny lies, claiming that this is the case with all supplies;

[11:28] “The criminals keep the port, and Putin signs papers that the port would function. Formally, Putin represented the interests of the state, but in fact he just helped the bandits at the port” – Without adducing any proof, he says that there are a number of bandits who manage the port, and Putin is bad because he entered into deals with them for the supply of products, and it is not clear why Putin, who is specifically performing his official duties and is not a law enforcement specialist, is to blame;

[12:40] Says that oil is sent through “Gunvor” (unsubstantiated), Tymchenko earned unthinkable money (unsubstantiated), shows the page of the US Treasury (probably) where it is written that Putin invested in “Gunvor” (unsubstantiated) and that Putin may have access to the finances of “Gunvor” (unsubstantiated) – a lot of information, proof is very much needed, I’m sure there should be some…;

[13:00] “In whose name this share (allegedly Putin’s share) was registered was not clear” – Then he shows Kolbin, and says that he is a friend of Putin, because “Dozhd” said so (i.e., the statement is unfounded);

[13:32] “Kolbin is the holder of Putin’s share” (unfounded);

[13:45] “Maksim Freydzon (an open anti-Putiner who previously wrote that Putin earned money from selling cocaine, so a “good” source of truth about Putin) said in an interview (unfounded): ‘Putin wrote the necessary amount on a piece of paper, and Miller took this money’” – as proof, Navalny quotes the words of someone who lost a court case versus Gazprom and who openly hates Putin, for years writing terrible nonsense on the Runet. The quality of the documentation is so-so;

[14:30] Navalny says that the capitalisation of Gazprom was $360 billion, and then it became 70 billion. The cost is given in dollars in order to reflect the decline that is a reflection of the ruble rate, but the value of the company and the ruble rate do not depend on Miller, as well as events in Georgia in 2008 and the events in the financial sector in the US, which all impacted the cost of thousands of companies in the world, but nevertheless Navalny associates the drop in the company’s value with Miller’s activities. In rubles, everything looks different;

[14:40] “It fell 5-fold” – well, this is the same thing, Navalny strongly lies. If to remember that the decline is due to external factors, and that the value of the company from the beginning of the 2000s to 2008 increased tenfold… then in general, it is somehow not pleasant when such disinformation is spread;

[15:17] “The truth is that Putin’s friends turned out to be the shareholders of the new bank” – Let Yury Kavalchuk be Putin’s friend, but it is not clear why Navalny mentions friends again, at what point did illegality occur?;

[15:40] “everything illegal acquired by Putin’s gang lies there” – an unfounded lie;

[16:10] “Team of bribe takers” is an unsubstantiated statement, all subsequent accusations are based on the fact that a number of officials have had a career since the 90s and all are familiar with each other, this is sad;

[16:48] “They have been in power for 30 years, and they like to tell us how they are against the damned 90s” – distortion and just stupidity, one does not contradict the other.

[17:21] He tells a well-known story about the accusations of Salye, pulled from thin air, half-unfounded story about Putin’s activities in the Committee on Foreign Relations. Apparently there hasn’t been any proof and documents for a long time, but I deny that Putin could have screwed up: there were many checks, but any indictments. Whether there were opportunities to get products without having relations with one-day firms, Salye does not explain, and most likely is completely incompetent concerning this question. While Putin did admit that there were problems with the supply of products, but denied the sale of some raw materials, and Salye also did not provide documentary evidence of her accusations;

[18:50] “Anatoly Chubais offered to join the administration…” – Putin.. The question is, why did Putin have to refuse and how does this expose him? If my boss at the station where I work is corrupt, do I have to quit in a hurry?;

Further, “Putin’s wife, in the office of the port of St. Petersburg, wrote letters to Germany” – what is Navalny hinting at? It is not clear why he does this. The fact that the state worked with this port is already clear. Concerning whether Putin is at fault, I personally think not, he is not busy with a criminal investigator… charges were brought against the port administration much later, as Navalny himself said;

[21:06] Aleksey says that a German banker paid for the treatment of Putin’s wife, so Putin, who works in the administration, is a bribe taker – A bribe is the reception of values for professional services. Putin personally was given a lot of things by both entrepreneurs and presidents even when he was already president, a whole herd of puppies is probably all bribes? The help of a friend in the treatment of a spouse can be regarded in different ways, and I agree that it may not look good, although it can be regarded as the onset of insurmountable circumstances;

[21:41] “Matthias Warnig” – Aleksey hints that Putin has put his friend on the boards of directors in a number of major companies;

Next, a fictional story about a conversation between Sechin and Putin about apartments and Putin’s alleged impressions. Just unfounded nonsense and delirium;

[24:05] Further, “Putin’s wife, in the office of the port of St. Petersburg, wrote letters to Germany” – what is Navalny hinting at? It is not clear why he does this. The fact that the state worked with this port is already clear. Concerning whether Putin’s at fault, I personally consider that he isn’t, he is not busy with a criminal investigator… charges were brought against the port administration much later, as Navalny himself said;

[24:50] “To neutralise Skuratov, the FSB arranged an entire operation” – an unsubstantiated statement and speculation. Where is the proof that Skuratov did not compromise himself?

[25:59] “As soon as Putin became stronger in power, i.e., he subdued television, the courts, and established a system of election fraud” – unsubstantiated claims, for the sake of colourfulness;

[26:42] “If you want to steal, share it with Putin” – an unsubstantiated statement and slander;

[27:00] “The most secret and protected object in Russia is… the palace” – an unsubstantiated statement, but funny;

[27:55] “The only real owner of this place from the very beginning to the present day is Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin” – an unsubstantiated statement that will not be backed up by anything up to the very end of the film;

[28:09] “The President of Russia is mentally ill (unfounded), he is obsessed with wealth and luxury (unfounded)“;

[28:52] “We will show the palace of the most corrupt from the inside” – so, it can be seen, this is a protected object;

Next, a beautiful, high-quality and informative video about the infrastructure of the residence;

[39:34] “There is an official no-fly zone over it, just like over nuclear power plants or secret military facilities” – Aha, or like over all the other residences of top officials;

Then he talks about Kolesnikov and Gorelov and many other companies, about their construction activities. Every time he mentions Putin, he talks about other people, linking them in any way with Putin;

[43:12] “In the early 90s, the company Petromed was established, the city hall in St. Petersburg also had a stake in this company, and the interests of the city in such companies were represented by the deputy mayor Vladimir Putin” – unfortunately, it is unfounded, it would be possible to back up such points that specifically relate to Putin;

[44:01] “They agreed that the oligarchs such as Abramovich and Mordashev will donate money to Petromed (unfounded), and Petromed will spend it on medicine (great, but unfortunately unfounded), but part of the agreement was that 35% of the donated amount will go to a special offshore (unfounded)“;

[45:36] “… And 94% of the shares were given to Putin… “ – no documents and references, just unsubstantiated statements, but already specific figures. As I understand it, the whole film is based on the testimony of Sergey Kolesnikov, who is a politically engaged character. But the main thing is not this, it is important that Aleksey Navalny calls everything related to investment projects, which by the way were led by Sergey Kolesnikov, Putin’s theft, which of course is an unfounded lie. There are no grounds to claim personal enrichment. The whole point of Petromed is to take away a part of the income of the oligarchs and make this money spin in the economy, Kolesnikov himself tells reporters in 2011. All of Putin’s involvement was invisible, and Nikolay Terentyevich Shamalov allegedly acted on his behalf. There is no proof of this claim, and there will not be up to the end of the film;

[46:25] “Putin was Mikhail Ivanovich” – An unsubstantiated statement, which is the speculation of all participants in the discussion;

[47:01] “Shamalov is the main liaison from Putin (unfounded)“;

[47:44] As evidence of the value of the objects, Navalny cites a letter to Medvedev from Kolesnikov, i.e. the one with whom he immediately communicates, this is in the least not professional, and in general ridiculous. But it will pass for immature minds, and it is this screenshot that they will present to the public as proof;

[48:00] An unsubstantiated statement about equipment and cost. Neither the equipment nor the cost of course is not given, besides, all this has to do with Putin’s “associates”, well, i.e., people’s noses are rubbed into it throughout the film and will continue up to now;

Moreover, Kolesnikov in an interview in 2011 says that medical equipment purchased for a medical organisation in Russia was sold at discounts from 5% to 60% depending on purchased volumes (From the words “Here there is one feature”) out of 100% of the cost, part of the cost was offset by private donations from the oligarchs, and 35% of the total cost for the equipment cost was accumulated offshore in an investment company. Moreover, Kolesnikov himself welcomed this scheme, accompanied it and in 2011 claimed: “This is not fraud. We could keep this profit for ourselves”;

Now Navalny interviews the same character, and transforms this testimony into “theft”, of course, completely groundlessly;

[48:24] “We paid taxes to treat people with this money, they took this money and spent it on Putin’s palace” – well, finally, from simple unsubstantiated statements, Navalny moved to an unsubstantiated lie. What taxes are we talking about, the budget of the special programs was based on private capital transferred to Shamalov officially as donations – (with the words “Yes. We met and discussed the project.”);

[49:04] “And the fact that Putin (unfounded) at his personal dacha (unfounded) put himself on the gate (unfounded)“;

[49:20] “Kolesnikov’s story, confirmed by dozens of documents” – Kolesnikov published something somewhere, but why are the key points not included in this film, the documents aren’t good enough? The film is steep, but why is there so little proof? It’s unsubstantiated;

[49:25] “Putin wants a palace, Putin will get a palace” – populism and unsubstantiated claims;

[49:34] “The palace seemed to be bought by Aleksey Ponomarenko” – why “seemed”, if according to the documents that Navalny will show it will be proved that he bought it, but bought it cheaply, then the crime is just that someone sold some real estate very cheap, but legally;

[50:02] “We are opening financial accountability of the offshore” – for the first time in the film a document (!) appears – financial accountability, but the fact that this same offshore is related to the residence, then that this particular item from the statements is related to the residence and to Shamalov, the fact that this is the only reporting document and there are no others – you must take his word for it, the investigation that led to this document is simply omitted;

Kolesnikov himself says that the palace was built from the income of his activities in the investment company with Shamalov, which brought in private income;

[56:20]

Angelina, [23 Jan 2021 at 11:45:57 pm]:

Some cuteness for you in your feedback. The film is experiencing a strong hunger for documentary filmmaking, and in order to emotionally suppress this hunger for the viewer, Navalny, after demonstrating the plan of the building, says the following: “You can say in objection: You yourself invented all this, drew the plans, then show us” – well, what can I say, the veracity of the plans does not bother anyone and even doesn’t concern, and in general the plans don’t not prove anything at all, especially in relation to Putin, it’s the rest of the conclusions before these plans that confuse. But Navalny playfully clings to the plans, stuffing himself with this cheapness the price of a truth-teller and the owner of stunning and incriminating proof. All this looks cheap and sad;

[1:02:50] “Statement in support of the constitution” – I shed tears of laughter: amazing. By this point, it became clear that this construction site is not well suited to the residence, then Putin stopped believing that he would live here at all, although he suspected such a thing, despite the lack of any evidence of this. Well, for example, the theatre, the theatre! How can you keep everything a secret if there is still a theater there, despite the huge number of staff? The whole life of this house would certainly be public if Putin lived there. More like the palace of the monarch, of course, I don’t think it will be Putin, maybe the State Service found a direct descendant of a surviving member of the royal family – oooh!!! – and they are building him a house?

[1:09:58] “A special position was invented to protect business, Putin’s” – an unsubstantiated statement;

[1:10:38] “Another Putin deal for many billions of rubles” is an unfounded lie, since neither before nor after, judging by the film, did Putin make any deals;

[1:11:10] “Someone gave free of charge two and a half annual budgets..” – A lie, in his own table the maturity date is written, why the words “free of charge”?

[1:13:52] About the beaten ecologist: why not publish the case and talk about the actual circumstances of this event. Why the environmentalist was beaten was also omitted from the film;

[1:15:02] “I can repeat for the third time, these vineyards are actually part of Putin’s possessions” – an unsubstantiated statement, as Goebbels said, “repeat even more lies as often as possible and everyone will believe”, Navalny, as a follower of Goebbels, only does this, instead of investigating, he can only repeat the same unsubstantiated, fake in general claim.

[1:20:06] “So we saw a huge bribe that was given to Putin” – An unsubstantiated statement, yes, yes, Navalny, no matter how much you repeat it, without proof it always remains an unsubstantiated statement;

[1:21:40] “This Kovalchuk registrar was created specifically so that it was impossible to say exactly what belongs to whom” – an unsubstantiated statement, especially given that it immediately proves that it is not difficult to collect information. But it is possible to assume that the registrar should hide the information, due to the fact that the object has an increased level of secrecy, as well as all related activities. Next, there is a lot of interesting information about various companies of Kolbin and Tymchenko related to real estate around the palace. Billions of rubles in accounting securities, and not meaning the corruption component of these funds, but of course, nevertheless, the data is interesting;

[1:24:37] “A firm that is illegal (unfounded), and fraudulent (unfounded) but still owns the presidential palace” – a number of unsubstantiated claims that probably should have been confirmed by some data up to this point, but there was no such data. Just neuro-linguistic programming of some kind, the main thing is to repeat “crooks” many, many times;

[1:29:36] “On him (Shalomov) it is simply recorded that Putin stole or received in the form of bribes” – another unsubstantiated statement, which in general does not correlate with any data mentioned in this film, not even confirmed. The only point that Navalny voiced in his opinion about Putin’s bribery is a bribe in the form of a palace. Again, neuro-linguistic programming (NLP). We know, we were taught.

[1:29:40] What is Aleksey hinting at? That Putin is bad because he did not give the shares of Gazprom to the boy? – too hellish a precedent, as for me, if the request was granted, and I doubt that it was a boy who asked for the shares, and not a girl;

[1:30:29] “Mikhail Shelomov is the owner of 39 million Gazprom shares“ – that’s even believed, but still unfounded, why not show the original source?

[1:32:00] Next, everything about Aleksandr Plekhov is unfounded, without references, without documents, everything must be taken at face value;

Even further about Plekhov, Kovalchuk, Putin is still to blame for the fact that everyone who is financially tied to the construction of the palace and knows the name Putin;

[1:37:20] “Binom received 4.3 billion rubles from Transneft, using a fictitious lease scheme” – an unsubstantiated claim, nothing from the table displayed at this moment in the video proves that the lease is fictitious.

Of course, renting an amphitheater is a strange object for Transneft, and at the moment this is the most interesting information of the entire film, but I really want to make sure that renting a number of objects of only a few infrastructure complexes costs 120 million rubles a month;

[1:38:55] “And this is in addition to the billion dollars that has already been invested in construction by 2017” – an unsubstantiated statement with numbers from thin air;

[1:40:40] “This common fund is used by Putin to cover the expenses of family members” – an unsubstantiated statement;

[1:40:52] “And Putin has a rather rich and satiated personal life” – That’s it, Aleksey got into Putin’s underpants, well, it’s indeed in vain that he speaks in a film about dry finances, this spoils everything

The story of “Krivonogikh”, like everything before it, is just a series of completely unfounded, unsubstantiated statements. And all because Krivonogikh is whirling among the same group of businessmen described above.

[1:43:55] “Billions of stolen money is spent on the upkeep of another Putin woman (A. Kabaeva)” – an unsubstantiated claim;

[1:47:26] “Kabayeva’s mother received an apartment from joint-stock company Teploinvest” – but how this is connected with Putin apparently does not matter at all;

[1:50:00] “Every day new laws prohibiting criticism of the government” – the picture shows information about blocking materials that offend society, the state, authorities and state symbols. This is called lying, distorting and quite dirty, why so? Navalny is a living example of the fact that criticism of the government in the Russian Federation is completely freely practiced. Trump wrote a couple of times about electoral fraud, he was blocked by a dozen social networks. In our country, every second person writes about all kinds of theft and falsification, and were many of them blocked for this? If Navalny were more careful in his appeals and actions, he could still be elected president;

[1:50:02] “All who are dissatisfied are ‘foreign agents’” – false;

[1:50:06] “It is already forbidden to even campaign for candidates in the elections” – an unfounded lie. It is not forbidden to promote. United Russia is asking the rights for the election commission of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation to apply to the controlling media bodies to block those resources that violate the legislation of the Russian Federation on elections and referendums, which, by the way, remains unchanged. In other words, it will be possible in the future to campaign as it was possible before, but it should be done according to the law as before. The new bill will only allow to block resources that violate the law. I am sure that Navalny knows all this, lying deliberately and quite brazenly. Well, then he tells fair things, if all these officials stop stealing, we will live better.

All the disclosure of information in Navalny’s film about the “corruption” of the president is based on the fact that all the people associated with large construction projects and ventures are familiar to each other today and were familiar 20-30 years ago, and they also know Putin. Navalny dedicates the entire film to this point, which probably means that everyone is stealing. I, for example, studied at the same school with “Complex 29“ in Naberezhnye Chelny, I know many people, I supported and maintain relations, but this does not mean that I was part of the organised criminal group “Complex 29.“ Navalny also talks about a big bunch of businessmen and their financial relationships through a large joint-stock company, part of which pay for the construction of the Palace – Where Putin features here, who the hell knows, even if Navalny suggests, but does not have at anything his disposal: the whole film is about the means of some people and companies, but calls the palace Putin’s.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.