WHO (finally) admits PCR test is potentially flawed: Second PCR memo in two months casts even more doubt on the “gold standard” of Covid diagnosis
OffGuardian, Jan 26 2021
The World Health Organisation has released a memorandum which potentially completely undermines all the “pandemic” case numbers from all over the world. On Jan 13 they put out this memo, stating that a single positive PCR test should not be used for diagnosing Sars-Cov-2 infection. To quote them directly:
Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.
Translation: If you get a positive test for someone with no symptoms, re-test them. Or rather: any PCR positive test is potentially a false positive. It goes on to say:
Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health-care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.
Note it says “an aid for diagnosis” and NOT “a diagnostic test.” In careful bureaucratic language, they are essentially admitting that PCR tests were not meant to be used diagnostically, and cannot be relied upon to do so accurately. Just as Dr Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, said himself many times. Understand this. The PCR test is virtually the ENTIRE foundation of the Covid narrative. Without it you have nothing but healthy people and the normal winter flulike illnesses. Every ‘case’ you read about is only a case because of a PCR test. We and others have been saying since at least June that the PCR test is scientifically meaningless. And now, by degrees the WHO is admitting it too. And if the PCR test is meaningless. So is the “pandemic.” A lie built in the deliberate misuse of a tool not fit for purpose.
4 Comments
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/01/jon-rappoport/david-rasnick-new-strain-of-the-coronavirus-or-a-giant-con/ I have just one word: SCAM. Thanks for share this article..!
That’s a very interesting article, too. I like the white print on black background. Maybe I should do that here, too
No, I can’t do it on this (unpaid) version
All medical tests are meaningless unless they are viewed in the context of the totality of information that led up to the need for the test (once known as “using judgement”). Medical bureaucracy however likes “objective” algorithms better largely due to funding models and liability anxiety, so tests get viewed in isolation from circumstances, boxes get ticked, bills get paid and the Judge says “no case” because the correct boxes were ticked. The patient is incidental to all of this.