2 from rt.com

Internal emails reveal that the Dutch government suppressed White Helmets’ financial fraud – what else are they hiding?
Kit Klarenberg, RT.com, May 11 2021

After an explosion in a depot close to an IDP camp near al-Fua,
northwestern Idlib, May 3 2021. Photo: Omar Haj Kadour, AFP

The epic establishment clean-up operation launched in the wake of James Le Mesurier’s apparent suicide was effective in the short term, but determined digging by critical journalists means the scandal definitely isn’t over yet. A Dutch newspaper, De Volkskrant, has published a stunning exclusive based on internal government emails, exposing how officials conspired to prevent a minister publicly raising concerns about fraudulent activity at Mayday Rescue, the now-defunct “humanitarian” organization behind Syria’s highly controversial White Helmets The internal communications show that, following the ever-mysterious demise of Helmets and Mayday founder James Le Mesurier in Nov 2019 in Istanbul, Sigrid Kaag, the Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, planned to formally caution parliament about financial impropriety on Le Mesurier’s part. Several draft statements were produced over the ensuing Christmas period, in which Mayday was openly named.

Her anxieties were well-founded. On Nov 8, three days before his death, Le Mesurier openly confessed in an email to his organization’s numerous international donors, of which the Netherlands had been but one, that he was guilty of misconduct and fraud, admitting to forging receipts to hide the disappearance of $50k in cash, paying himself and his wife Emma Winberg “excessive” salaries, and potential tax evasion, among other malfeasance. While claiming this wasn’t intentional, he took full and sole responsibility, and warned against further investigation into Mayday’s financial affairs, fearing that continued probing could expose yet more “mistakes and internal failures.” In the wake of his apparent suicide, Volkskrant reports that donor countries, who’d collectively committed in excess of $100m to Le Mesurier’s cause, convened a crisis meeting at the Dutch consulate in Istanbul, at which diplomats concluded the Netherlands was “extra vulnerable”, given all the funding it had provided to Mayday, and the organization having ostensibly been based on its soil, meaning millions in international payments had been processed through Dutch accounts.

Funding from Amsterdam had nonetheless ceased in Sep 2018, after a Ministry of Foreign Affairs report outlined serious concerns about Mayday’s financial practices, including a virtually total lack of oversight over, and even awareness of, how its money entered Syria, and precisely where it eventually ended up. However, top Netherlands State Dept officials strongly disagreed with Kaag’s proposal, arguing that if lawmakers were warned at all, it was best done confidentially, as if the allegations weren’t in fact true, it could “unjustly harm” Mayday. After some toing and froing, a compromise was struck, Kaag agreed to wait for the results of an independent audit of Mayday by accounting firm Grant Thornton to be published, whereupon a letter would be sent “immediately” to parliament. As the auditors went about their assessment, in February 2020 diplomats again travelled to Istanbul to discuss the organization’s possible malpractice. Key considerations for those present were “avoiding political risks” and ensuring “minimal exposure” for Amsterdam in the case.

As luck would have it, Grant Thornton found no evidence of fraud, but did identify major failings in bookkeeping and financial supervision, with many payments untraceable. Kaag opted to keep the report private, and declined after all to apprise parliament of its conclusions. This move would be somewhat inexplicable if the auditor did indeed exonerate Mayday, but the emails unearthed by Volkskrant amply demonstrate that it didn’t. In one missive, a Dutch official states that “it cannot be established with certainty” that the Netherlands’ subsidies to Mayday had in fact been provided to the White Helmets. When asked which funds in particular, they responded, “all expenses to the White Helmets.” In other words, fraud on the part of Mayday couldn’t be detected only because quite literally no records relating to where any of the sums actually went existed. As such, it’s unsurprising that an independent follow-up probe of the organization’s finances was considered to be a waste of time.

The Dutch Central Audit Service, which controls government expenditure, in summer 2020 ruled that €3.6m should “preferably” be reclaimed from Mayday. However, Grant Thornton’s findings were invoked to argue there were “insufficient grounds” to pursue the matter, and Mayday was duly removed from the list of cases to be reported to parliament in Jul 2020. Volksrant’s seismic revelations will no doubt make extremely uncomfortable reading for a great many powerful people. After all, the mainstream media, and the numerous governments which funded Mayday, have struggled to get their story straight on Le Mesurier, his company, and the group he founded, ever since his fatal plunge. Over the final months of 2020, a concerted campaign was waged to tie up the assorted loose ends. First, in October, a fawning 6k-word Guardian hagiography acquitted Le Mesurier on charges of fraud, being an agent of British intelligence, using the Helmets as a Trojan Horse for regime change in Syria, and affiliation with extremist groups.

The next month, a multi-part BBC World Service podcast series amplified this sycophantic apologism globally, while in the process smearing independent journalists and researchers who’d raised questions about the Helmets as agents of the Russian and Syrian governments, who bore significant responsibility for Le Mesurier’s suicide by spreading malicious, dangerous “disinformation.” Both The Guardian and BBC relied exclusively on Grant Thornton’s audit to exonerate Le Mesurier of fraud charges, despite not actually having seen the findings, the former firmly contended it was just one example of how “Le Mesurier unravelled under the weight of claims that would later prove to be false.” That this fundamental aspect of the exculpatory mainstream narrative of Le Mesurier and the Helmets has now seemingly been demonstrated to be entirely bogus, one can only wonder what other elements are similarly erroneous, why, and what else Mayday’s backers have to hide.

In respect of the latter question, one answer could well be direct or indirect funding of violent terrorist groups in Syria by the Netherlands if not many other Western governments, under the cover of humanitarian payments to Mayday. In Dec 2020, Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte admitted that he blocked a parliamentary request for an independent investigation into this very question. After initially attempting to deny having done so, the previous month he told journalists such a probe may result in “tensions” with Netherlands’ allies, and “put the lives of former members of opposition groups at stake.” Evidently, try as the establishment might, the controversy surrounding the White Helmets isn’t going anywhere, and, in fact, is gaining significantly in volume and credibility. It’s anyone’s guess which will be the next domino to fall. Watch this space.

Using ‘Russiagate’ & ‘bounties’ logic, anonymous officials now claim GRU behind mysterious ‘sonic attacks’ on US spies
Nebojsa Malic, RT.com, May 11 2021

Mysterious “sonic attacks” a scientist had identified as the work of crickets are now being blamed on some kind of Russian secret sci-fi superweapon by anonymous US officials, using the same script as “bounties” and ‘Russiagate.’ The “suspected directed-energy incidents” that have allegedly afflicted US diplomats and spies around the world may have been the work of “Russia’s military intelligence unit, the GRU,” Politico claimed on Monday, citing “three current and former officials with direct knowledge of the discussions.” Both the CIA and the State Dept are looking into the alleged attacks, but “all 18 federal intelligence agencies” are now focusing on the GRU’s “potential involvement” according to one anonymous congressional official. That makes it highly likely the source is someone from the office of House Intelligence Committee chair Adam Schiff (D-California), best known as the promoter of the conspiracy theory that Russia “hacked our democracy” in 2016. That part about “18 intelligence agencies” is almost verbatim the “17 intelligence agencies” line used in Russiagate. The Space Force has added another agency in the meantime, you see. Trouble is, only select teams from four (the FBI, CIA, NSA and ODNI) ended up actually involved in the Russiagate document. They produced an assessment that the alleged meddling was “consistent with the methods and motivations”they attributed to Moscow. Compare that to Politico quoting one anonymous former official, somehow supposedly still in the loop, who said:

This looks, smells and feels like the GRU. When you are looking at the landscape, there are very few people who are willing, capable and have the technology. It’s pretty simple forensics.

Another former official said that Israel and China may also have the technology, but not a presence in all the locations of the alleged incidents, or desire to attack Americans. But Russia does? Again, no evidence, or even explanation what any of this is supposed to be based on. Politico’s sources also admitted no specific weapon was identified, but that didn’t stop them from speculating about a device that could fit into a car or a large backpack, capable of targeting an individual from 500 to 1,000 yards away. Does any such weapon actually exist? Now that the KGB is no more, US propagandists love pointing the finger at GRU, which hasn’t been known under that name for a decade by the way. The agency has been accused without evidence of everything and anything, from hacking the emails of Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager John Podesta and running WikiLeaks in 2016, to paying “bounties” to the Taliban to kill US troops in Afghanistan. The “Russian bounties” story, likewise based on anonymous sources, emerged just in time to derail President Donald Trump’s plan to withdraw from Afghanistan by the end of 2020, and give then-candidate Joe Biden ammunition to call Trump unpatriotic. After Biden was installed in the White House and announced that he would withdraw from Afghanistan, the “bounties” story was downgraded to “low confidence” and quietly dropped. Politico’s bombshell speculation was picked up and parroted just as quickly and uncritically as the bounties story had been. In doing so, outlets around the world ignored the publication’s warning earlier in the day that the White House communications team handles all the quotes emanating from administration officials. While Biden campaigned on “following the science,” a phrase the 78-year-old is fond of repeating in speeches, that commitment seems entirely absent from discussions of the alleged sonic incidents. Back in Jan 2019, a US Berkeley scientist said he had analyzed the recordings of the “attacks” published by AP and identified them as the chirping of the Indies short-tailed cricket.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.