very definite that the short-term target is china

US seeks to ease tensions at Biden-Putin summit, as anti-China drive escalates
Andrea Peters, WSWS, Jun 16 2021

Biden and Putin arrive to meet at the ‘Villa la Grange’ in Geneva, Jun 16 2021. (Photo: Patrick Semansky/AP)

Summit talks between Biden and Putin concluded on Wednesday with declarations by the heads of state that the dialogue had been “good,” “positive,” and “quite constructive.” Against the backdrop of the intensifying US-led war drive against China, Washington appears to be trying to ease tensions with the Kremlin. The ultimate aim of such an effort, over which huge question marks hang, is to disrupt Moscow’s deepening economic, political and military ties with Beijing in order to isolate China in preparation for war. The discussions were held just after the conclusion of G7 and NATO meetings, at which China was identified as the primary target of world imperialism. Speaking at separate press conferences on Wednesday, Biden and Putin said that their more than two-hour long discussion covered a range of topics including nuclear agreements, the conflict in Ukraine, competition over of the Arctic, cyber-security, human rights and economic ties. While providing few details, each indicated that further high-level discussions would take place in an effort to restore “strategic stability.” Ambassadorial relations, which had been broken off in March after Biden called Putin a “killer,” will be restored. The New START treaty is to be extended to 2024. There will be bilateral working groups created to address arms control and ransomware attacks.

With regards to Ukraine, no mention was made of Crimea, the Black Sea peninsula that the US and Europe accuse Russia of having illegally seized. In addition, the two sides stated their commitment to the implementation of the Minsk Protocol, accords signed in 2014 and 2015 that lay the basis for a negotiated settlement over the status of the Donbass—a region in eastern Ukraine controlled by pro-Russian separatists who came to power after the staging of a far-right, US-backed coup in Kiev. The Ukrainian government, which has recently been moving troops and military equipment to the contested area and said it intends to retake Crimea by force, has repeatedly expressed its opposition to implementing the Minsk agreements. Wednesday’s endorsement of Minsk follows on the heels of Biden’s pre-summit statement that Kiev was “not ready” for membership in NATO, to which the country has been hysterically appealing for admission. After years of Washington’s strident anti-Russian rhetoric over Moscow’s “violations” of Ukrainian sovereignty, it appears that the country and its extreme nationalist leaders have been sidelined—at least temporarily—in the interests of the US pursuit of larger geopolitical aims.

Despite being repeatedly pressed by reporters to make hostile declarations against his Russian counterpart and state that the US had threatened “military consequences” over further alleged cyber-attacks, the American president stated that “no threats” were made and that the Kremlin leader offered “to help” on issues related to Afghanistan, Iran, and Syria. Relatively little was said about Alexei Navalny, the much-fawned-over “pro-democracy” oppositionist, although Biden did indicate it would be bad if he died. The US press corps at Biden’s event seemed genuinely disappointed that there was less braying for blood. Many in the American media and ruling establishment had anticipated that Trump’s replacement by Biden would signal a harsher policy toward Moscow. A tactical shift in Washington’s relationship with Russia will provoke both internal and foreign conflicts. A glimpse of this was on display on Wednesday. Just as Putin finished his press conference, EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell told reporters, “We believe that a renewed partnership allowing us to realise the full potential of a close cooperation with Russia is a distant prospect.” He said the EU anticipates a “further downturn of our relations” with Moscow.

Whatever tactical maneuver Washington may be attempting to carry out, its readiness to strike at Moscow was also made clear. Biden warned Putin that, should he not abide by “international norms,” his “credibility worldwide” would diminish and there would be “consequences.” The US has an immense capacity to unleash cyber-warfare, observed the US leader, noting in particular the vulnerability of Russia’s oil industry. Putin pointed to US support for “democracy”-building organizations in Russia, which he observed were little more than puppets of US foreign policy. While downplaying Biden’s previous description of him as a murderer and violator of human rights, the Russian president pointed to police killings in the US, the deaths of innocent civilians in drone strikes, the existence of CIA black sites and the continued operation of Guantanamo Bay as examples of American hypocrisy on human rights questions. Beneath the surface appearance of cordiality that both leaders tried to project on Wednesday lie explosive tensions. As the summit took place, NATO was conducting its largest-ever military exercises, explicitly directed at Russia. The US has been beefing up its military presence in Ukraine, the Black Sea and the Arctic, and in May the Biden administration released a military budget proposal that would bring US arms spending to record levels. Russia recently declared the creation of 20 new anti-NATO military divisions, to be stationed on its western borders. This summer it has been reviewing the fighting capacity and readiness of its ground, air, and naval forces nationwide.

In his remarks Wednesday, the US President stated that some expected to hear that “Biden said he would invade Russia,” a remark that unintentionally revealed the very real threats of war surrounding the summit. Whether through a direct military conflict, the use of ethnic and national differences to break up the country, the promotion of internal conflict or all three, Russia remains in the gunsights of American imperialism, which views its domination of a large portion of the Eurasian landmass as an intolerable limit on US imperialism’s appetites. But what is increasingly coming to the fore, as was demonstrated at the G7 summit, is a sentiment that China must be the first target in America’s build-up to war. The Wuhan lab theory, which over the last two months has been placed at the center of US and European foreign policy, is laying the groundwork for the argument that Beijing is responsible for the death of millions. This follows on the heels of endless accusations that China is manipulating its currency, violating international trade conventions, pursuing control over East Asia’s sea lanes, abrogating human rights conventions, and on and on.

There are significant concerns in Washington that the US cannot maintain a two-front war. Inasmuch as the anti-Russia campaign has encouraged closer ties between Moscow and Beijing, this has raised worries that American imperialism may be biting off more than it can chew. For its part, the Russian ruling class has been in a deepening state of disarray over what to do about the inter-imperialist conflict in which it finds itself ensnared. There are divisions both inside and outside the Kremlin over the country’s relationships with China and the US. Russia is dwarfed in all respects by its much larger neighbor. For years, Putin sought a more amiable relationship with the US, constantly referring to his “friends” across the Atlantic even as the tensions with Washington grew. Biden himself identified the crisis facing Moscow when he was asked whether a new “cold war” was emerging in US-Russia relations. In reply, he observed:

Russia has a multi-thousand mile border with China. Their economy is struggling. China’s moving ahead … seeking to be the most powerful economy in the world. I don’t think (Putin) is looking for a cold war with the US.

Regardless of what anyone is “looking for,” war has a logic of its own. Tactical twists and turns aside, it is clear that the drive by the American ruling class to defend its waning global hegemony threatens the world with a massive military conflagration.

At G7 summit, Tokyo escalates tensions with China over Taiwan
Ben McGrath, WSWS, Jun 16 2021

Japanese PM Yoshihide Suga at the G7 summit in Carbis Bay, Jun 13 2021. (Photo: Phil Noble/AP)

Japan and the US are continuing their campaign to demonize China in preparation for war, a fact that was on full display at last weekend’s G7 summit in the United Kingdom. Lining up with Biden’s aggressive anti-China push, Japanese PM Yoshihide Suga used the platform to continue to question the “One China” policy regarding Taiwan and back the false claim that Beijing is responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic. According to a White House press release, Biden and Suga met on the sidelines of the summit “to discuss shared challenges in the Indo-Pacific and the world, including COVID-19, climate change, North Korea, China, and preserving peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait.” Similar statements were also included in the G7 communiqué, which was essentially a threat of war against Beijing. Tokyo and Washington are not concerned with “peace and stability” in Taiwan or anywhere else in the region. The US is seeking to ensure its post-WW2 hegemony with an all-sided offensive against China, the world’s second-largest economy, aimed at neutralizing it and if necessary, through war and dismemberment. The Japanese ruling elite is supporting these efforts to further its own imperialist ambitions. The US and Japan are also seeking to offset their own crises, including widespread popular anger over their criminally negligent and profit-driven responses to the pandemic.

During the G7 summit, Suga also called for Taiwan to be allowed to participate in the annual World Health Assembly (WHA) as an observer. The WHA is the WHO’s decision-making body. Taiwan is not a country and therefore not a member of the WHO. Suga claimed that allowing the island to participate would prevent the development of any “geographical vacuums” in addressing global health issues. Suga’s call for Taiwan to be part of the WHO has nothing to do with public health. Its purpose is to undermine the “One China” policy and further the lie that Beijing is responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic. Encouraged by Washington, Taipei has claimed the WHO ignored its warnings about human-to-human transmission of the virus in a Dec 31 2019 email to the agency. The document, however, did not mention the possibility of such infections. The push to include Taiwan in the WHO is therefore based on an attempt to raise the island’s international standing, at the expense of Beijing, based on lies. This agenda is fully backed by the entire Japanese political establishment, including so-called left parties like the Stalinist Japanese Communist Party (JCP) and Reiwa Shinsengumi. The latter was founded by actor-turned-politician Taro Yamamoto, who has sought to position himself as a left-wing political outsider. In reality, Yamamoto enjoys close relations with numerous high-profile politicians, including Ichiro Ozawa, a leading establishment figure within the bourgeois opposition bloc.

On Jun 11, the House of Councillors, the upper house of Japan’s National Diet, unanimously passed a resolution calling on Tokyo to pressure other countries into accepting Taiwan’s inclusion in the WHA beginning next year. The JCP holds 13 seats in the upper house while Reiwa holds two. The resolution followed PM Suga’s first in-person meeting with opposition party leaders in the Diet on Jun 9, during which both he and Yukio Edano, leader of the main opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, referred to Taiwan as a “country.” These were not mere slips of the tongue, but a coordinated provocation against Beijing. In his remarks, Suga listed Taiwan as a “country” alongside ANZ, praising them for their COVID-19 responses. The following day, Beijing criticized Tokyo. Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesman Wang Wenbin stated that Suga “broke Japan’s long-standing promise not to regard Taiwan as a country.” He added:

China demands that Japan make an immediate clarification to undo the harm already caused and guarantee a similar incident will never happen again.

On Jun 11, Chief Cabinet Secretary Katsunobu Kato walked back the statements, saying:

Japan’s position is to maintain working relations with Taiwan at the non-government level … That’s our basic policy and there is no change to that.

This does not alter the fact that Washington and Tokyo are provocatively and continuously chipping away at the “One China” policy. Tokyo has not explicitly repudiated the policy, an act that could lead to war, but its continued questioning of Taiwan’s status sharply raises the risk of a conflict occurring. The US and Japan see Taiwan as a crucial component in a war against the Chinese mainland. There are historical parallels between Tokyo’s actions today and its colonization of Taiwan in 1895, a result of Japan’s victory in the First Sino-Japanese War. At that time, Japan recognized that Taiwan was an important launch pad for projecting its power into Southeast Asia. In addition, while Tokyo claimed the war was meant to “free” Korea from China’s control, Japan sought to expand into mainland Asia, which culminated in the annexation of the Korean Peninsula in 1910 and the further expansion of Japanese imperialism into Manchuria. Tokyo and Washington are now engaged in a similar campaign to ramp up pressure on China by backing Taiwan’s anti-Beijing government, making false and exaggerated claims of genocide in Xinjiang, and voicing hypocritical human rights’ concerns over Hong Kong. Such an agenda has nothing to do with defending democratic rights but is leading the world to a deadly global conflict.


  1. Paul
    Posted June 17, 2021 at 8:37 pm | Permalink

    The way you express this gives a whiff of the Hitler-Stalin summit that led to Hitler having a free hand in the West.

  2. niqnaq
    Posted June 18, 2021 at 5:34 am | Permalink

    Well, it’s their view: they expect Putin to react like Stalin did, I suppose.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.