Category Archives: Uncategorized

let’s be fair: we’ve got gangsters and nazis in 404, but we also have some seriously deranged militia leaders (or ex-) in the east

Quote from Milton : “Andrei, fuck his lies start wagging. Let further be put to shame.”

Milton, with interest read your posts, most of which are filled with interesting information. The impression that you are well familiar with the local “cuisine” and always in the loop. So it was surprising to read your reply to Roland Deschain regarding the “relationship between Beszler and Barkashov.” First, you wrote that Barkashov had no page in VKontakte, since his arrival on the territory of Beszler (in which he threatens to take revenge on the Devil) is nothing more than a fake. The next day, you quote the Beszler, who wishes he had shot the sons of Barkashov for their drunken brawling. There is a personal conflict between two people, which you in a clumsy way tried to disavow. Why was it necessary to mislead others in? Wanted so bad to usatt opponent (Roland Deschain) that went for this forgery? Or tried to cover up the figure of the Devil from gossip?

Quote from Cat Wise: “I understand from Beszler that he (Barkashov) is their ideological and not natural daddy.”

Quote from Attila: “Well as far as I know, natural sons; (one know) they fought and got back a bad mood.”

What’s the difference? Barkashov just the same has stood up for them. By the way, what a figure who has at that respect, unlike more than odious Beszler.

ha ha, look, it’s gangsters vs nazis, i cannot say i give a damn

Pindostan condemns the violence in Kiev and urges the govt to find and punish the perpetrators. We condemn today’s violence and call on all Ukrainians to respect law and order.
– State Dept spox Mark Toner

We are certainly concerned to observe the manifestations of violence. Of course, we condemn such violence, consider them to be totally unacceptable. In any case, all that was going on, we regard as an internal matter of Ukraine.
– Kremlin spox Dmitri Peskov

One of the soldiers of the national guard died from a gunshot wound to the heart. The injury was initially thought to be from a shard from the grenade that was thrown, but people heard the sound of the shot.
– 404 Minister of Interior Arsen Avakov

As a matter of fact, you can hear 5 or 6 shots right before the grenade gets thrown, on a video I posted yesterday. Here it is again:

Below: I think we can thank the CIA for this one: Radio Svoboda is RFE/RL’s Russian service – RB

And this one, I think we can safely quote William Burroughs:

This is operational, even to the cucumbers.

this is chapter one of tishby – a rough draft, and constructive help is welcome

I’m surprised how many examples of personal glossolalia there are in this, I mean, he makes up words because he likes the sound of them, most usually by doubling one or several letters in the final syllable. This is bloody annoying, actually. I also find it a bit astonishing, But there it is, and when he does it, I either fix it ‘silently’ if it is a minor instance, or just copy it straight into the english if it is a major instance. Occasionally, I have made up a word to suit his own, eg ‘knesseret’. I don’t know for sure what ‘amnitsia’ is supposed to be, but I think it ought to be the anamnesia of Plato; that is, the remembering, not the forgetting.

Important Note: New visitors should note that I already did Tishby’s Preface, here – RB

[1] מציאות הרע ועוצם כותו במהלך החיים הטרידו תמיד את המחשבה האנושית, וביחוד את המחשבה הדתית. ההכרה הדתית, המבוססת על האמונה במציאותו של כוה עליון, טוב ושלם בתח כלית. נתונה במבוכה לגוכח פעולת הרע בעולם. הסותרת ומבטלת לכאורה את שלטונו המוחלט של החוה. האלהי הטוב, קשה לה ליחס את הוית הרע למקור האלהי, כי יש בזה משום פגם בשלימותה של האלהות המחייבת העדר כל חסרון, בעוד שהרע הוא חסרון וגריעות ביסודו.

הכעיה נסטעפה בעיקר לשני ראשים: (א) השאלה המיטפיסית-אונטולוגית של התחולות הרא, מקורו ויסודות קיומו; (ב) השאלה האנטרופולוגית של הפגעים בחיי האדמ. כאן תפס הצד המוסרי, כלומד אי-הצדק שבחיים, את את המקום המרכזי, מכיון שבו היה בולט ביותר הנגוד לטובו המוחלט של אלהים (1). שאלה זו נוסחה ביהידות בנסוח המפורסם: “צדיק ורע לו רשע וטוב לו” (ברכות ז’ ע”א).

תורת הבריאה של היהדות ניתן הפתרון לבעית הרע שלא במתכוון. היא לא נוצרה כתשובה לשאלת הרא, אלא הקדימה כביכול לתת תשובה בטרם הספיקה השאלה להתגבש ולנקר במוחות. ואילו אחת מתורות הבריאה האחרות שמעניננו להזכירן כאן – היינו תורת השניות הגנוסמית – היא בעיקרה תוצאת ההתלבטות בבעית הרע (1). הגנוסיס, באשר לא יכלה להשלים אפילו עם הרעיון של בריאת הרע ע”י האל הטוב, דוגלת היא בתורת שתי הרשויות, המסירה כל מגע בין האל הטוב לבין הרע. העולם, שטוב ורע משמשים בו בערבוביה, לפי רוב השיטות הגנוסטיות הוא פרי ההתנגשות בין שני הכוחות העליונים. כוח האור וכוח החושך. ברואליסמוס זה לכל גווניו יש משום יחוד מקום לרע ככוח עצמאי ממשי בתהליך הקוסמוגוני ובחיי האדם.

פתרון שונה מזה, השואף להמנע מהכנסת קרע לתוך ההויה, ניתן בתורת האמנציה של הניאו-אפלטוניים. גם בלבס פועמת ופועלת הרגשת הניגוד בין הטוב לבין הרע, בין העולם הרוחני הטחור לבין העולם החמרי העכור. אלא שהקצוות נגשרים ונקשרים בסולט-המעלות של הטצילות. הירידה המודרגת של האור האלהי מביאה לבסוף לידי התהוות הרע, האידנטי עם החומר לפי התורה הניאו-אפלטונית. אולם חוליה אחרונה זו בשלשלת האצילות אינה בגדר הויה חדשה אלא מעין אפיסת ההויה. החומר הוא צל ההויה האמתית, והרע הוא בעיקרו העדר הטוב, העדר האור האלה (2). כאן ניטל שוב העוקץ מבעית הרע ע”י הפיכתו לישות מבוטלת. תורה זו, שעם כל הרקע הדואליסטי שלה היא מוניסטית ביסודה העיוני, מבטלת לא רק את שתי הרשויות שהגנוסיס אלא מכסה דם את התהום שבין הבורא לבין הנבראים, הנמצאת בתורת היהדות.

[2] בתורת הקבלה נפתח פרק חדש בשאלת הרע ביהדות. אם לא נביא בחשבון את פילון האלכסנדרוני ואת הגנוסטיקאים היהודים, שעיקר השפעתם היה מחוצ לגדר היהדות, הרי אפשר לומר שהקבלה היא התורה היהודית הראשונה, העוזבת במפורש את עיקרי תורת הבריאה היהודית (3). המקובלים אמנם בשימוש הטרמינולודי לשמור אמונים ככל האפשר לערכי המסורת הלהציל מה שניתן להצלה בהתאם לתפיסתם, אבל בעיקרו של דבר ממלאים הם את המונחים הישנים תוכן חדש וזר לגמרי. הם מדברים, למשל, אפילו על בריאה יש מאין, אבל האין אימו אצלם אפיסה ממש אלא האין האלהי (1). אך מהי התפיסה ההדשה, שהקבלה מכניסה מטוך היהדות? לפי המבנה החיצוני של תורת האצילות בקבלה. המדברת על השתלשלות כוחות אלהיים מאין-סוף ולמטה, נראה כאילו לפנינו תורה בעלת אופי ניאו-אפלטוני מובהק. ואין ספר שעכ”פ מהמאה הי”ג ואילך חדרה השפעה ניאו-אפלטונית ניכרות לתוך הקבלה, ומקובלים אחרים מדברים על הספירות כעל דרגות-בינים בשלשלת ההויה (2). אולם תיאורי התנועה שבעולם האצילות, הדינמיקה של עליות וירידות, זווגים והשתלבות הספירות זו בזו, הנמצאים לרוב בוהר וביתר ספרי הקבלה, מעידים על כח שמלבד העד הניאו-אפלטוני שבספירות, הרי הן לפי מהותן כוחות בעלי אופי גנוסטי. יש בהם משום גילוי הטבע האלהי והחיים האלהיים (3). בענים גבולות האמנציה אין הדעות שוות; יש אומרים שהתהליך נמשך עד העולם התחתון, ויש שמפטיקים אותו בהאצלת הספירה העשירית ואת התחוות העולמות התחתונים. הנכללים בשם “עולם הפירוד” מיחסים לאקט מיוחד של בריאה, בכל אופן ברור, שביסוד תורת האצילות של הקבלה מונחים מוטיבים ניאו-אפלטוניים וגנוסטיים, המהולים בהסתייגויות ידועות מתוך שאיפה לשמול על הקשר עם המסורת היהודית.

האופי הגנוסטי הברור של תורת הקבלה מתבלת ביותר בבעית הרע, הרעות על מקור הרע ואופן התהוותו מרובות חלוקות הן כבר בקבלה הקדומה. אבל מלבד רמזים מועטים בזהר על זהות החומר והרע (1). ובס’ מערכת האלהות על בחינות ההעדר שברע (2), אין אף דעה המביעה בבירור את ההשקפה הניאו-אפלטונית, שהרע הוא הקצה התחתון בשלשלת האצילות. אדרהא, הזהר עצמו וברוב המקורות האחרים נאמר בפירוש. שהוית הרע קדמה בהרבה לסיום תהליך ההתהוות הקוסמית. ולפי דעות חשובות קדמה אפילו לגמר הבנים האלהי שך עולם הספירות. בספר הבהיר מדובר כבר על כוחות הרע כשלותי מדת הדין של הקב”ה (3), וזוהי גם הרעה המרכזית בזהר, המדבר הרבה על כוחות ה “סטרא אחרא”, שמקורם בהגבורות הדין בתחים הקדושה. יציאת כוחות הטומאה ממקורם הקדוש מתוארת במקומות רבים בזהר כנשירת הפטולת המצטברת בכוחות הדין (4). לפי ר’ יצחק הכהן נאצלו מספירות הבינה, הנקראת אצמו “תשובה”, עשרה שרים מקטרגים, המיווים מערכת מקבילה למערכת הספירות (5). כל הדעות הללו ועצם השם “סטרא רחרא”, המציין את הרע כצר שכנגד לכוחות הטוב, מעידים על הלך-רוה דואליסטי-גנוסטי. מובן, שתורת השניות העומדת בניגוד קיצוני לכל המסורת היהודית היתה מעונה מיתוק ומשמוש, ולשם כך הורידו המקובלים את הרע לדרגת אצילות משנית (6). יתר על כן: הם חזרו והדגישו, שגם התחומו המיוחד אין הרע פועל אלא כשליח, מעין מלאך חבלה, המוציא לפועל את גזירותיו של הקב”ה. עי”כ רצו לדמור על הקשר עם תורת היהדות הקדומה על האופי האינסטרומנטלי של הרע, אם כי תפיסה זו אינה הולמת כלל את תיאוריהם הם על המלחמה הנטושה בין שתי המערכות (1).

[3] קבלת האר”י מהווה מפנה יסודי הן בתורת הבריאה והן בבעית הרע ע”י נכנסת גורמים חדשים. שהם עמורי-התןך של כל השיטה: צמצום, שבירה, תיקון. אך חידושים אלה אינם מקרבים קבלה זו למסורת הקרומה אלא מרחיקים אותה עור רעחוק נוסף בסיבוך התהליכים ובהבלטת האופי המיתי-גנוסטי. עם כל שינוי צורתם נשמרים כאן רעיונות האצילות, והשניות מקבלת תוספת כוח בקבלת האר”י.תורת הצמצום, שלפיה התחלת ההויה היא ב הסתלקות האור האלהי, אינה מבטלת את עצם האמנצןה. פינוי מקום העולמות מאור אין-סוף אין פירושו שבמקום הפנוי נתרחשה בריאה במובן הקדום, אלא הפינוי הוא מעין הכנה לתהליך האצילות, הסתלקות לשם התפשטות (2). “והנה כאשר צמצום עצמו, אז דרך צר אחד מן החלל המשןך דרך קו אחד ישר רק כעין צנור אור אחד המשיך מן הא”ס אל תוך החלל וממלא אותו, ודרך קו הזה נמשך ויורד אור א”ס אל תוך החלל העגול שהוא הנאצל, ועי”כ מתדבק המאציל בנאצל יחר” (3).

ובכן אין להטיל ספר באופי האמנטיטטי של קבלת מאר”י. אדרבא, האמנציה מגעת אצלו עד תחתית החויה (1), אלא שהתהליך מסתבך מכמה בלינות. ראשית, אין האור יורד בקו ישר מלמעלה למטה, החוית מתפתחת בקצב של הסתלקות והתפשטות, העלם וגילוי. הצמצום אינו פעולה ראשונה בלבד, הוא חוזר ונשנה בכל דרגה ודרגה, “גם תבין כי בכל בחינת הוצאת אורות חדשים היה קודם להם ענין הצמצום” (2). שנית, בין אינ-סוף לבין עולם הספירות, הסמוכים ודבוקים בקהלה שלפני האר”י, הוכנס וכאן בחינות ועולמות, מרובים שלא בא זכרם קודם (3). ריבוי זה מרחיב את היקף תחומי האצילות וחושף שכבות בחיי האלהות המתגלה, ועי”כ מטה את הכף עור יותר לצד הגנוסטי-תיאוסופי שבאצילות הקבלתית (4).

עקיר הסיבוך הוא במאורע השבירה (5). בשלב אחד בהקמת עולמות האצילות האלהיים – בעולם הנקודים – מתעכב ומופרע התהליך הכפול של צמצום ואצילות. שטף האור האלהי פורץ את סכריו והכלים שהותקנו לקליטת האור נשברים ונופלים למטה. מכאן ואילך מתרחש הכל תוך מאמצים לחידוש הבני םול תיקון ההריסה, ולא רק הכנין האלהי שבו נתרחשה השבירה נחמוטט, אלא גם העולמות התחתונים שהיו גנוזים התוכו נפגעו, וגם התהוותם היא בדרך התיקון (6). מהלך ההתפתחות נטה ממסלולו ובמקום צמצום טאצילות פועלים שגי גורמים חדשים: שבירה ותיקון, כי התיקון – עכ”פ מבחינת ההויה שבזמן – אינו נעשה בבת-אחת ואינו מקים בנין-עד. יש עור מקום לשבירות ולזעזועים נוספים המצריכים תיקונים חדשים (7), וכך חוזר חלילה עד אחרית הימים.

בנין המיקון אינו יכול להיות איתן ובטוח, כי עקב השבירה קם עריב ואויב לכוחות האלהיים מבונים: סמאל וכתתו. השבירה גרמה להתהוות כוחות הרע, החותרים תחת יסודות התיקון, כי כל קיומים וחיותם בהרס ובחורבן (1). ולא עור אלא דם ניצוצות מן באור האלהי נפלו לתוך הקליפות ושבויים בידן, וכל עוד לא יגאלו ולא ישובו למקור מחצבתן אין אפשרות להשלים את התיקון (2). שני כולות עומרים במערכה, זה הורס וזה בונה, וכל ההויה היא בחינות שדה-קרב (3). העלאת הניצוצים לשם השלמת התיקון והשמרת כולות הרע – זוהי התכלית שהכוח האלהי שואף אליה (4). השניות הזאת מקיפה את כל תחומי ההויה, כפי שנראה להלן. שרשיה היו נעוצים כבר בתוך האלהות לפני השבירה. אחרי השבירה מפלגת היא את העולמות ואת האדם לשתי מערכות מנוגרות, והיא המניע הראשי בשאיפה הגאולה שפירושה התגברות הטוב על הרע.

תורת השבירה משווה לקבלת האר”י אופי של מיתוס גנוסטי ממש. נקודות המשען של מיתוס השהירה הן המדרש “היה בונה עולמות ומחריבן” (5), והתורה המיסטית שנקשרה בטגדת המדרש בקבלה שלפני האר”י. תורת העולמות שנחרבו הופיעה בקבלה בשתי צורות עיקריות, אחת אצל ר’ יצחק הכהן ואחת בזהר. לפי ר’ יצחק הכהן קרה חורבן העולצות באצילות ה “שמאלית”, הטמאה. תחילה נאצלו מהבינה שלשה שרים “אכזרים” ו “קשים”, שדעתו של המאציל לא נחם מהם ונתבטלו בגזירתו. רק אח”כ נאצלו שבעת השרים, העמרים בקיומם ומהווים את מערכת המקטרגים (1). התורה השניה, תורת הזהר, מדברת על עולצות של האצילות הקדושה. שלא היו בני-קןום מחמת היותם דינים בלתי ממות/ום. רק לאחד שנעשה תיקון ה “מתקלה”, היינו המערכה הכפולה בחינה זכר ונקבה שיש בה משום אןזון הכוחות, היתה הבריאה בת-קיימא. דרשת הזהר בענין זה בגויה על הפסוק: “ואלה המלכים אשר מלכו בארץ אגום” (2). האר”י עצמו תולה את תורתו בדרשות הזהר, ביחוד ב “אדרות”, ומשתמש בציורים ובמונחים הנמצאים שם. כאילו כל תורתו אינה אלא תוספת ביאור לדברי הזהר. אך ההבדלים היסודיים שבין תורתו לבין הקודמות לה מראים, שאם גם רעיונות הזהר שמשו חומר ומניע לפיתוח המיתוס, הרי עיקר התורה הוא בחינות חידוש ויצירה מקורית.

נציין את הנקודות העיקריות, הקובעות את החידוש שבתורת האר”י: (א) אצל ר’ יצחק המאורע הוא בתחום הרע ולפי הזהר אין לו קשר ישיר לבעית הרע, ואילו בתורת האר”י חורבן העולמות הוא הסיבה לדילוי הרע; (ב) האצילויות ה “שמאליות” שנתבטלו חוזרות למקורן (3), העולמות שבזהר נגנזים (4), ובניגוד לכך נופלים חלקים משברי הכלים לתוח הקליפםת; (ג) בשתי התורות הג”ל אין החורבן משפיע כלל על המשך התהחיך, ואילו השבירה עוצרת את מהלך ההתפתחות וכל השתלשלות ההויה קשורה בה ובתיקוני, חשיבותם הרבה של השינויים האלה תתברר בריוננו המפורט.

[1] The existence of evil and כותו during life have always bothered the human mind, especially the religious thought. Recognition of religious, based on the belief around the power of the highest, goodness and peace before death. Given the embarrassment לגוכח an act of evil in the world. Contradicts and cancels the alleged reign of experience. The divine is best, it’s hard for it to be treated with the הוית bad source of the divine, because it has because a flaw in the perfection of the concept of God requires the absence of any imperfection, in that evil is the imperfection of a lack, basically.

The question branches out mostly two heads: (A) The metaphysical-ontological question of the inception of evil, its origin and existence; (B) The anthropological question, of misfortune in the life of man. Here caught the moral side, that is to say injustice in life, the central place, because where was the most prominent contradiction of the goodness of the Lord (1). This question is a formula ביהידות in wording famous: “the righteous man can do either evil to the evildoer or good to him.” (Berakhot, 7, ע”א).

The theory of creation of Judaism can be the solution to the problem of evil unintentionally. She was not created as an answer to the question of evil, it’s too early to give an answer even before the question had emerged to peck at minds. While the one world creation other seven days of memory here – we were the law of second gnosis – is mostly the result of dilemma problem of evil (1). Gnosis, for it is not able to complete even with the idea of the creation of evil by the good Lord, advocates the Law of the two authorities, drop all contact between God and good, and evil. The world, that good and evil are used in interchangeably, according to most of the methods of the Gnostics is a fruit of the collision between the two powers. Power of light and power of darkness. Realistically that’s all that there is, because setting aside a place for evil as a real independent force in the cosmogonic process and the person.

A different solution that seeks to avoid the rending of the spirit into ההויה, can be in the amnitsia of the neo-Platonists. Also בלבס throbbing and running you felt the contrast between good and evil, between the spiritual world and the world of murky clay. But the edges, bridges and connections in salt – the virtues of ha-Atzilut. The decline and darkening of the light of god brings finally next to me becoming evil, identical with materiality, according to the Torah and the neo-Platonists. However, link this last in the great chain of being is not a new idea, but an אפיסת idea. The material thing is a shadow of the real idea, and evil is essentially the absence of good, the absence of light among these (2). Here lies again sting terrifying evil by becoming the entity off. This law, with all the dualistic background it ministers, fundamentally theoretically, eliminates not only the two authorities of the gnosis, but covers with blood the abyss between the Creator and beings, which is in the Law of Judaism.

[2] in the kabbalah opened up a new chapter on the question of evil in Judaism. If we don’t bring into account Philo of Alexandria and the Gnostics among the Jews, whose main influence was outside the fence of Judaism, then after all, you can say the kabbalah is the Jewish Torah first, leaving out specifically the main points of the Jewish theory of creation (3). Channels although used terminology keeping the faith as much as possible the values of the tradition and to save what can be saved, depending on the capture, but essentially they fill the old terms with new content, and a stranger completely. They’re talking about, for example, Adam being created from nothing, but isn’t his mother fallen, and not the highest (1)? But what is the new perception that imposes itself from outside upon Judaism? According to the outer structure of the highest in the kabbalah, talking the chronology of forces of god where finally and down, looks like ahead a teaching of a definitely neo-Platonic nature. But there is no book surviving from the thirteenth century onwards that brings any considerable neo-Platonic influence into the kabbalah, and accepted others’ talk about the sefirot as levels amongst others in a great chain of life (2). However, descriptions of movement in the world of the highest, the dynamics of ups and downs, conjugations and integration into the spheres with each other, which the disciples of the Rav disseminate and tell of the kabbalah, attest to the power that apart from the witness, and the remaining neo-Platonic books, we are, according to their forces, in nature Gnostic. There is them because the discovery of nature of the life of the highest (3). Concerning the limits of amnitsia no opinions are equal; some say the process is continued until the lower world, and שמפטיקים it. In Atzilut count the tenth and התחוות worlds as lower worlds. Included named “world of separation” extremely special act of creation, however clear, that underlies the theory of the highest of the kabbalah guided motifs neo-Platonic and pseudo-Aristotelian, known from the ambition from the left about the connection with Jewish tradition.

The obvious Gnostic character and emphasis of the teachings of the Kabbalah presented many problems about the origin and nature of evil, and the seeds of multiple divisions are already present in the early kabbalah. But clues are few in the Zohar about the identity of the material and evil (1). And according to the Sefer Moreket, the concept of god separates upon examination (2). There is no opinion that expresses clearly the view of the neo-Platonists, that evil is the bottom edge in the chain of existence. אדרהא, the Zohar itself, and most other sources say specifically that evil has made a lot of progress towards ending the process of cosmic becoming. And according to some opinions, are important to progress even to the judgment of the children of the most high in their world spheres. In the book made it clear they are already talking about כוחות as religious messengers of evil, the judgment of God (3), which is also a central motif in the Zohar, the desert. A lot of the forces of “the other side”, originating from Gevurot, the judgment from the depths of the Holy. כוחות force the impurities to detach themselves from their holy originals. The Knesseret of הפטולת is described in many places in the Zohar as possessing cumulative powers of attorney (4). According to R Yitzchak ha-Cohen, the sefirot themselves realize, themselves call out: “Answer!”, like ten accusing angels, an evil system equivalent to the system of sefirot (5). All of these opinions and the name “the other side,” indicating the bad narrow opposing forces best, is indicative of spirit-rending Dualistic-Gnostic tendencies. Of course, a second torah is opposed in extreme terms by the Jewish tradition, and מיתוק משמוש was martyred, for having demoted the creator of evil to a secondary rank of excellence (6). Moreover: they’re back, and stressing that they do not intend to descend to the abyss for any specially evil acts, but as a messenger, a sort of Angel of sabotage, the executor of the גזירותיו of the Almighty. עי”כ want לדמור about the connection with the theory of Judaism early on the instrumental character of evil, although this approach is not appropriate at all; their theory abandoned the war between the two systems (1).

[3] The kabbalah of the Ari is a turning point elementary are in the Law of creation and the problem of evil by going into new factors. They עמורי-the insides of my method: tzimtzum, shevirah, tikkun (contraction, shattering, repair – RB). But these innovations do not bring this this kabbalah to the tradition הקרומה but keeping her skin רעחוק more complicated processes ובהבלטת character mythical-Gnostic. With every change shape are kept here ideas of Atzilut, and seconds get extra power in the kabbalah of the Ari. The theory of tzimtzum, whereby the start ההויה she in denunciation light of the highest, does not eliminate the bone of amnitsia. Evacuation place of the worlds of light there’s Ain-Sof, it doesn’t mean that instead of free נתרחשה healthy in early, but this is a sort of preparation to the process of Atzilut, denunciation for proliferation (2). “And when tzimtzum itself, through one narrow from space continued through one straight line just sort of tubing one light continued from א”ס into the space and fill it again, and by that line drawn, down light into the space round Atzilut (3),עי”כ מתדבק המאציל בנאצל יחר”.

Well there lay a book character האמנטיטטי of the kabbalah of the Ari. On the contrary, the amnitsia my poor, unworthy notice him until the bottom of the experience (1), but the process gets a few בלינות. First of all, there’s no light down in a straight line from top to bottom, החוית develops at the rate of הסתלקות והתפשטות (histalqut ve-hitpashtut: these are forms of mutual enchainment, similar to the Buddhist laws of mutual origination – RB), the world discovery. The tzimtzum is not the first action only, is repeated every rank and rank, “also understand that any examining out new lights had before them a matter of tzimtzum” (2). Secondly, between Ain-Sof and the world of the sefirot, adjacent ודבוקים בקהלה before the Ari, inserted here בחינות and multiple worlds, you don’t want memory first (3). This increase expands the scope of Atzilut to reveal layers of my life. The concept of God which is revealed, in about down the spoon skin more to the Gnostic emphasis – theosophical kabbalah of Atzilut. (4).

עקיר the complication is in the breaking point (5). In phase one, the establishment of the worlds Atzilut in the highest – world of niqudim – delayed ומופרע the process of double tzimtzum and Atzilut. The light flux to the highest breaking the סכריו and tools that were installed to the absorption of light break and fall down. From here on takes place all in the efforts to renew the son םול repair demolition, and not just הכנין the highest where נתרחשה Atzilut נחמוטט, but also the world’s foundations that were hidden away. התוכו hurt, and as they are generated is the patch (6). Course of development swayed off course and instead of tzimtzum, the highest operate two new factors: shevirah and tiqun, because the tiqun – עכ”פ in terms of ההויה that is not done at once, and putting up a building-up. There’s a place skin more fragile and shocks requiring additional new repairs (7).

Building המיקון can not be firm and secure, because due to the breaking up עריב and forces of enmity to the highest have built up: small וכתתו. The shevirah caused to come into being forces of evil, the foundations of the tiqun, because all existences וחיותם destruction and ruin (1). And skin but blood sparks of light from the highest fell into shells ושבויים reserve for themselves, and as long as will not be saved and will return to the source מחצבתן unable to complete the repair (2). Two voices omrim in the campaign, it destroys and builds, and all ההויה בחינות is a battlefield (3). Raising the sparks to complete the repair and the watcher (female – RB) voices bad – this is the purpose that the power of the highest aims at (4). Seconds that encompasses all areas of ההויה, as we shall see below. שרשיה were embedded in the concept of God before shevirah. After shevirah, party is the worlds … and the person two systems מנוגרות, and motivation the main goal of salvation means overcoming of good over evil.

The teaching of the shevirah calls for the Ari character of Gnostic myth really. Points of fulcrum of a myth of the shevirah, the Midrash “he built worlds and destroyed them” (5), and mystical binds בטגדת seminary at kabbalah according to the Ari. The theory of worlds being destroyed shows up in the kabbalah in two main forms, one with R’ Yitzchak ha-Cohen and one from the Zohar. According to R’ Yitzchak ha-Cohen, happened destruction העולצות Atzilut the “Left”, unholy. First from Atzilut, from Binah, three “fierce” or “tough” songs, whose opinion of the judgments of the highest does not comfort them ונתבטלו. Only later fell the remaining seven Ministers, העמרים the existence and form the system המקטרגים (1). Secondly, the second Torah, the teaching of the Zohar, talking about עולצות of the Holy Atzilut. That wasn’t my son – existence due to their being laws is death. Only one of us to do fix the malfunction, we’d act a dual examination on a male and a female, include her because of the balance of forces, was the creation of sustainable. Sermon in the Zohar about it בגויה on the verse: “these are the kings who ruled in Edom” (2). The Ari himself hanging his teachings, sermons, be careful, especially on the “אדרות”, and uses in the paintings and in terms that are there. Like all teachings is nothing but extra annotation according to be careful, but fundamental differences between the teachings and the previous show, if ideas be careful to use, material and motive for the development of the myth, the bulk of the features of the teaching turn out to be innovation and creativity original.

We note the main points, providing for the renewal of the teaching according to the Ari: (A) with R’ Isaac the occasion is in evil, and according to be careful he doesn’t have direct contact problem of evil, whereas in the Ari the destruction of worlds, that is why לדילוי bad; (B) The highest the “Lefts” שנתבטלו repeated למקורן (3), the worlds and according to the Zohar נגנזים (4), as opposed to falling parts from the tools and from the shells; (C) in both doctrines, the no destruction affects at all for your continued התהחיך, While breaking stops the course of the development and chronology of ההויה tied her and repairs, the significance of many of these changes turn out to be a בריוננו detailed.

in the end, too many people sloshing around will destroy the remaining privileges of the old colonial master nations, but it will also probably destroy most of everything else, one way or another

Austria inspects trucks for migrants, creates 18-mile backup
Pablo Gorondi, AP, Aug 31 2015

460x

BUDAPEST, Hungary — Austria stepped up vehicle inspections Monday at its Hungarian border after 71 migrants apparently suffocated in a truck, creating a huge traffic jam on the main Budapest-Vienna highway. In addition to the gridlock at the Hegyeshalom border crossing, about a 30-km backup at its peak, traffic was slower than usual at other spots along the Hungary-Austria border, the traffic monitoring firm Utinform reported. Traffic appeared to be flowing fairly smoothly by late afternoon and Austrian Interior Ministry spokesman Karl-Heinz Grundboeck said they would continue to conduct “spot checks” of vehicles at all main border crossings.

At Budapest’s Keleti train terminal, meanwhile, hundreds of migrants, many saying they were from Syria, boarding trains headed west to Austria and Germany, without apparent police intervention. In past months, Hungarian police, sometimes acting with colleagues from Germany and Austria, often removed migrants without the necessary travel documents from the trains. On Monday afternoon, there were long lines of migrants at the terminal’s ticket windows and police said a statement on the situation there would be forthcoming. Two of the express trains that left Budapest, however, were stranded on the Austro-Hungarian border after the Austrian Federal Railways refused to allow them to proceed into Austria, citing “overcrowding.” Austrian police spokesman Roman Hahslinger said some of those on the trains subsequently disembarked and continued into Austria with regional trains. A train with around 400 migrants from Budapest arrived in Germany on Monday evening, first stopping in the southern Bavarian city of Rosenheim where some were offloaded, while others then carried on to Munich, DPA reported. Border police said 190 of the migrants were taken in Rosenheim to a former military barracks to be registered. They included a family with five small children from Afghanistan who had fled three months ago, and others from Pakistan saying they had fled the Taliban.

Another 200 traveled on to Munich where police went through the process of registering them in a hall at the main train station. Passers-by spontaneously handed out water and candy to the new arrivals, DPA reported. It was not immediately clear where these migrants would be taken, but typically refugees are put into temporary housing until they can apply for asylum, including in former military barracks, container villages that have been built, and even tents. Earlier, the state government in Bavaria, which has all of Germany’s border crossings with Austria, said it also had launched special traffic checks on highways near the border. Despite the apparent easing of restrictions, the Hungarian government maintained its tough stance. Government spokesman Zoltan Kovacs said:

People at Budapest’s Keleti railway station demanding to be allowed free passage are demanding something which is not possible under European legislation.

Still, Austrian police spokesman Roman Hahslinger said at least several hundred, “possibly 1,000 refugees” had arrived from Hungary at Vienna’s Westbahnof station by evening. Many scrambled to get on to trains headed to Germany. All three countries are part of the EU’s Schengen zone of passport-free travel, where under normal circumstances vehicles are rarely inspected at the border anymore. The Hungarian government said:

Austria’s actions prove that no European country is going to allow illegal migrants, including refugees, to reach its territory without control.

As evening fell, an estimated 20,000 people protesting the hardships faced by the migrants staged a peaceful march through downtown Vienna. There were no reported incidents. About 160,000 migrants have been detained already this year in Hungary, more than triple the figure recorded in all of 2014. Many apply for asylum but quickly leave for Germany and Austria before their requests are decided. In Vienna, senior police official Konrad Kogler told reporters that since Austria began the increased checks Sunday they have resulted in the arrests of five human traffickers and the interception of 200 migrants.

Hungary is building a 4 m fence on its southern border with Serbia, to try to stem the flow of migrants coming across the Balkans. Hungarian MPs this week plan to discuss proposals allowing the government to deploy troops to the border and measures increasing penalties for illegal migrants and human traffickers. Austrian police say the 71 migrants likely suffocated in a truck with Hungarian license plates that was abandoned last week in Austria on the Budapest-Vienna highway. Five suspected traffickers have been detained in the case and Hungary is stepping up its arrests of smugglers. Helmut Marban, an Austrian police spokesman in Burgenland province where the truck was discovered, said another 12 Syrian travel documents had been found on the truck with Hungarian license plates, along with 10 cellphones. Forty autopsies had been carried out so far and results were to be tentatively announced Friday.

the sudanese phony peace treaty tracks the ukrainian phony peace treaty, move for move

South Sudan rebels say peace deal at risk from ceasefire breaches
Aaron Maasho, Reuters, Aug 31 2015

ADDIS ABABA – South Sudan’s rebel leader Riek Machar accused government forces on Monday of repeatedly breaking a ceasefire and putting at risk a peace deal just days after it was reached. Pres Kiir signed the peace pact on Wednesday, but even as he did so he accused rebels of attacking his forces (see the pattern? rebels forced to sign phony peace treaty, govt and its deniable militias keep attacking, govt shields itself by pre-emptively accusing the rebels of breaching the ceasefire first, etc – RB). The UNSC has warned both sides that it could impose sanctions if the deal collapses. Machar told Reuters in an interview in the Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa:

There is danger that is looming that could wreck this peace agreement now. Government forces are attacking our positions now, at this moment. We believe that this is an act that is a serious violation to the ceasefire, because what it does is provoke our troops that are in control of these areas.

Machar is expected (by the assholes who sit in Washington and write their pissy little scripts for how slave nations should behave – RB) to become first vice president during a three-year transitional period envisaged by the peace deal that aims to end 20 months of conflict in the world’s newest nation. The conflict erupted in Dec 2013 after a power struggle between Kiir and Machar, his former deputy. Fighting has reopened ethnic fault lines between Kiir’s Dinkas and Machar’s Nuers. Thousands of people have been killed and more than 2.2 million driven from their homes, many fleeing to neighboring states. Many in the nation of 11 million people depend on food aid to survive. Machar said government troops and their fleet of gunboats mounted with heavy artillery were encroaching further into rebel-held territory in oil-rich Unity state. A government spokesman could not immediately be reached for comment. On Saturday, the insurgents said their positions in Adok, a port in Unity state, and around Malakal, further east, came under assault by government troops, charges Juba denied.

all these sanctions just spiral out from the original bastard, david cohen in the treasury dept

Russian parliamentarian calls Pindo conference ban illegal
Edith Lederer, AP, Aug 31 2015

UN — The speaker of Russia’s upper house of Parliament denounced Pindo sanctions banning her from attending a world conference as illegal and took aim at Pindostan’s global status, telling the assembled parliamentary critturs by video link that the days of Pindo superpower domination are over. Valentina Matvienko, who leads the Federation Council, also blamed today’s refugee and migrant crisis in Europe and the emergence of ISIS on “the irresponsible policy of a number of Western countries and their allies.” She is one of seven Russian government officials targeted by Pindo sanctions, including a travel ban. The sanctions do not bar officials from UN events, but the Fourth World Conference of Speakers of Parliament is organized by the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), which only has observer status at the UN. Matvienko told fellow parliamentiar critturs from over 120 countries that she deeply regretted not being able to attend. Pindostan offered her a visa to go to the UN, but barred her from attending the parliamentarians’ conference. She said:

These Pindosi actions are not only illegal, but they are also gross violations of the norms of international law and the principles of democracy and freedom of speech. Sanctions against parliamentarians elected by the citizens of their country because of their political views, and this in the 21st century, is nothing other than political persecution. This conference is taking place at a time when there is a shift to a multipolar world order, accompanied by drastic crises and bloody conflicts, counter-revolutions and coups d’etat with horrendous humanitarian catastrophes. The old model of a unipolar world order based on the domination by one power or a group of countries has been confined to the past. But Pindostan and Western countries are making every effort to try to preserve it by openly pressuring other countries, subjecting them to unilateral sanctions and using armed force against them. As a result, terrorism and political extremism are raising their heads, entire regions are being plunged into chaos, holy sites are being destroyed, women, old men and children are being killed. Nevertheless, a new model of the world is confidently making its way forward.

IPU President Saber Chowdhury expressed disappointment that Matvienko had been barred from attending the conference, saying the organization strongly believes in dialogue, “which regardless of differences is fundamental to democracy and international cooperation.” Pindosi State Dept spox Kirby wouldn’t discuss the case Wednesday, except to note that Matvienko remains under Pindo sanctions. The conference, which takes place every five years, is focusing on implementation of new UN development goals to be adopted at a summit of world leaders in late September to combat poverty and tackle climate change. IPU spokeswoman Jemini Pandya said all parliament speakers were invited to the conference, but both John Boehner, speaker of the Pindo House of Representatives, and Mitch McConnell, majority leader of the Pindo Senate, said they were unable to attend.

“side deals” does not reduce to george jahn’s aug 6 article, it predates it

Congress, Iran and ‘side deals’
Kristina Wong, The Hill Aug 2 2015 (note early date, 4 days before George Jahn – RB)

So-called ‘side deals’ have become a big problem for the White House in its efforts to sell sceptical Vongress critturs on the Iran nuclear agreement. The White House is characterizing the deals as “standard” yet confidential. But the Thugs say the administration is required to submit them under a law passed by Congress whereby they give themselves authority to review the deal. White House officials says that despite the confidentiality of the understandings that have been reached, they also “know their contents” and would be happy to share them with all the Congress critturs in closed settings. They have not yet done so, however. At the same time, cabinet officials admitted this week that they’ve only been briefed on the side-deals, rather than having examined the wording, and that they only know of one administration official who’s actually seen the agreements. Walnuts McCain described that state of affairs as “absolutely astounding.” The Thugs are seizing on the confusion, which is sowing unease even among Dems, to drive opposition to the overall deal. As the critturs prepared to leave for the August recess, Ted Cruz introduced a resolution that seeks to reset the 60-day clock for Congress to consider the deal until the text of the side deals are submitted. And Tom Cotton mocked the administration Friday in a video statement posted to YouTube.

The IAEA and Iran agreed on a “roadmap” on Jul 14 to resolve a key Pindo concern (the Mossad-manufactured ‘smoking laptop’ allegations regarding ‘possible military implications’ of anything and everything, both nuclear and non-nuclear – RB). From the Pindo perspective, Iran needs to “come clean” on any prior work on a nuclear weapon, so officials know how close Tehran is to getting a nuclear bomb. The roadmap mentions two documents to address those concerns. These documents are what Republicans refer to as the “side deals” or “side agreements.” One of the documents details the arrangements under which Iran will answer questions on its past weaponization work, and the other sets out the access IAEA inspectors will have to Iran’s Parchin military site, where Iran is suspected of having tested detonators for nuclear devices. After a classified briefing by administration officials last week, Sen Jim Risch (R-Idaho) revealed that, under the arrangements, Iranian scientists would provide their own soil samples from Parchin to the IAEA to detect any cheating. Such an agreement is certain to be met with deep skepticism by Republicans. Administration officials have not disputed Risch’s remarks, but say the IAEA would have access to any site where there is a suspected violation, including Parchin, after a 24-day process.

The administration rejects the view that the documents in question fall under the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015, which allows Congress to evaluate and vote on the deal. But the Thugs argue that the act’s provisions specifically say the side-deals do indeed come under its remit. The provisions of the act state that “not later than 5 calendar days after reaching an agreement with Iran,” Obama “shall transmit to the appropriate congressional committees and leadership” the agreement as defined in the law, including all related materials. The law then defines “agreement” as including any “joint comprehensive plan of action entered into or made between Iran and any other parties, and any additional materials related thereto,” including annexes, appendices, codicils, and side agreements. Jackass Kerry said the documents were not “side agreements” but separate comprehensive safeguards agreements (CSA) that the IAEA normally creates with NPT signatories, which are expected to remain confidential. He said:

It’s a confidential agreement, which is the standard procedure of the IAEA.

Wendy Sherman, the lead negotiator for Pindostan, said Thursday she has seen the arrangements, but was not allowed to keep the text. She said on MSNBC Morning Joe:

I saw the pieces of paper, but was not allowed to keep them. All of the members of the P5+1 did in Vienna, and so did some of my experts who certainly understand this better than I do.

However, the day before, Jackass had said he was not sure if Sherman saw the final version, or just a draft or summary of the deals. Sherman said she briefed House leadership, “chairs and ranking members,” on the arrangements on Wednesday, and was trying to organize a briefing for senators in the coming days. The White House argues that since Sherman was not allowed to keep the text, “Congress has everything that the Obama administration has.”

Olli Heinonen, a former IAEA official now at Harvard, said that Pindostan could request to see the documents. IAEA rules and practices dictate that the IAEA secretariat cannot disclose its agreements to other member states on its own initiative. But there are ways for Pindo diplomats to access them, he told Business Insider. Iran can make them available by asking to distribute them to all IAEA member states. Or any member state that sits on the IAEA’s 35-member Board of Governors could request their distribution, Heinonen said. An objection could be overridden by a simple majority vote of at least 18 members. And although IAEA policy on such agreements states that the agency “shall not publish or communicate to any State, organization or person any information obtained by it in connection with the implementation of the Agreement,” “summarized information” may be published upon decision of the Board if the nations directly concerned agree. White House officials say if Iran does not fulfill its commitments under the side deals, sanctions will not be lifted. White House press secretary Josh Ernest said earlier this week:

The whole deal won’t go forward, none of it will go forward, unless Iran complies with the requests that have been put forward by the IAEA for access and information to write their report.

The documents require Iran to address IAEA concerns by Oct 15. The IAEA director general will then provide a final assessment on the resolution of those concerns by December. Iran’s compliance “is a prerequisite” to sanctions relief, Jackass said at a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing on Tuesday. He said:

If they haven’t complied with the IAEA and lived up to the dates that are laid out in the program, August and October, they will not get relief. The outcome of the IAEA’s assessment doesn’t matter, just whether Iran complies with the IAEA. We know what they were doing. We’ve already drawn our conclusion about 2003. We know they were engaged in trying to make a weapon.