whatever happened to the warsaw pact

NATO: Pentagon’s Gateway Into
Former Warsaw Pact, Soviet Nations

Rick Rozoff, Stop NATO, Apr 15 2010

NATO was founded in Apr 1949 by a country not on the European continent, the US, and eleven subordinates which had fought on both sides of the World War that had ended four years earlier: Belgium, Britain, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway and Portugal. Greece and Turkey were added in 1952, after their service in the Korean War, and West Germany joined in 1955. Five days after the inclusion of the Federal Republic of Germany, on May 9, in contravention of the 1945 Potsdam Agreement between Britain, the US and the Soviet Union which explicitly demanded and meticulously detailed plans for the demilitarization of Germany, the Soviet Union established the Warsaw Treaty Organization in response. Fellow members were Albania, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, the German Democratic Republic, Hungary, Poland and Romania. Albania formally withdrew in 1968, though it had not been a participating member since the early 1960s, and Romania had been a member in name only for at least twenty years before the pact’s formal disbandment. With the incorporation of Spain into the “military alliance of democratic states in Europe and North America” in 1982, the US-led military bloc grew from its original 12 to 16 members. By that time the Warsaw Pact had shrunk from eight to seven members, and some of the remaining ones were only selectively involved.

NATO regularly held large-scale military exercises in alleged defense of Norway, Denmark and other members, but had never deployed forces or conducted operations outside member states’ territories, counting on the thousands of US nuclear warheads in European NATO states to respond to the Warsaw Pact’s conventional military superiority in the event of armed confrontation. Military forces from the Warsaw Pact intervened in Czechoslovakia in 1968, and in the early 1980s it appeared they might do so again in Poland, and the Soviet Union sent troops to Hungary in 1956 after PM Nagy withdrew his nation from the Warsaw Pact. The Soviet justification for those actions was that nations in Eastern Europe gravitating toward the West could be transformed into tools for NATO, and especially its dominant member the US, to present a military threat on or near its borders. In 1999, eight years after the formal dissolution of the Warsaw Pact and the fragmentation of the Soviet Union itself, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland were brought into NATO as full members during the bloc’s fiftieth anniversary summit in Washington, while NATO was conducting its first large-scale military operation outside member states’ territory and its first major armed conflict: the almost three-month Operation Allied Force air war against Yugoslavia, which had not been a member of either Cold War military alliance.

The accession of three former Warsaw Pact nations in 1999 was the largest single expansion in NATO’s history. Five years later, at the Istanbul summit, seven new members were inducted, six former Warsaw Pact countries, including three ex-Soviet republics, and a former federal republic of Yugoslavia: Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia. With the earlier automatic absorption of East Germany into NATO with German reunification in 1990, by 2004 every member of the erstwhile Warsaw Pact except twelve of fifteen former Soviet Republics and short-term member Albania had been brought into the Western military alliance. Albania was incorporated at the NATO Strasbourg-Kehl summit last year. The worst suspicions to the east of the Cold War divide had been confirmed. Not only have all of the Soviet Union’s previous allies in Eastern Europe been recruited into a Washington-dominated military bloc that for eleven years has been actively waging wars in Europe and beyond Europe in Asia, but territory of what had been the Soviet Union itself now has a NATO air base (Lithuania) and a cyber warfare center (Estonia). Once Soviet Republics like Ukraine, Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia are being actively pursued by NATO, which has held military exercises in those countries. In 2007 NATO, selected the Papa Air Base in Hungary for its first Strategic Airlift Capability operation for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq (for the present). In the same year the Alliance announced it would open its first training center in a former Warsaw Pact country, in the Polish city of Bydgoszcz.

Starting the year after they were admitted as full NATO members, Bulgaria and Romania were approached by the US to offer the Pentagon access to several major military bases. Both countries had turned their air bases over to Washington in late 2002 and early 2003 for the invasion of Iraq, but in 2005 and 2006 Sec State Rice signed formal agreements on military bases with Romania and Bulgaria, respectively. The Mihail Kogalniceanu Air Base and training and firing grounds in Babadag, Cincu and Smardan in Romania, and the Bezmer Air Base, the Graf Ignatievo Air Base and the Novo Selo Training Range in Bulgaria were locked into initial ten-year agreements. The Pentagon is not planning to leave, surely not after spending billions of dollars to modernize the facilities. The deployment of between 5,000-10,000 US troops to the bases at any one time is the first Pentagon presence in former Warsaw Pact nations. And the seven Bulgarian and Romanian installations are the first US military bases in any of those countries. Neither the troops nor the bases were the last. The US has moved its Joint Task Force East, whose name alone indicates its purpose, to the Mihail Kogalniceanu Air Base in Romania, and in the words of the unit’s deputy commander in 2008, “We are building a permanent forward operating station here.”

The worst fear of the Soviet Union during the Cold War years was not just of NATO in general but of the US in particular moving its military personnel and hardware toward its borders. Anyone who experienced a nightmare of that occurring twenty years ago and only woke up decades later would have difficulty realizing it was no longer just a dream. NATO is, simply put, the major mechanism for moving the US military into the territory of what had been the Warsaw Pact. And the Soviet Union. Permanently and aggressively. By 2006 the advance of the Pentagon into Eastern Europe under the banner of NATO had become apparent enough, inescapably so, that quite far from the continent a Chinese military analyst, Lin Zhiyuan, deputy office director of the World Military Affairs Research Department of the Chinese Academy of Military Sciences, wrote that “new military bases, airports and training bases will be built in Hungary, Romania, Poland, Bulgaria and other nations to ensure ‘gangways’ to some areas in the Middle East, Africa and Asia in possible military actions in the years ahead.” As UPI described the plans in 2007, “The bases are part of an ambitious plan to shift EUCOM’s fighting brigades from western Europe, mostly Germany, to forward bases closer to the Caucasus, the Balkans, the Middle East and Africa, for a quicker strike capability.” The Bezmer, Graf Ignatievo and Mihail Kogalniceanu air bases in Bulgaria and Romania are being prepared as part of a series of new US strategic air bases outside the US.

In Poland, the activation of a PAC-3 interceptor missile battery manned by at least 100 US military personnel has been announced for later this month. The troops will be deployed only 35 miles from Russia’s isolated enclave of Kaliningrad and will be the first foreign forces stationed in that nation since the end of the Warsaw Pact. They will not be the last. After Obama met with the leaders of eleven new Eastern European NATO states, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia, in Prague on Apr 8 following the signing of the START II agreement with Russian Pres Medvedev, Polish Pres Tusk told reporters “From the perspective of Obama and the US, the signing of the START 2 treaty has no influence on the work on the SM3 anti-missile shield.” Tusk was not speaking of the short- to medium-range PAC-3 missiles that may arrive in his country any day, but of SM-3 longer-range anti-missile and anti-satellite interceptors that will be adapted from sea- to land-based use. In Pentagonese, the Aegis Ashore component of the Phased Adaptive Approach for progressively longer-range missiles in Eastern Europe, ones which in the third phase could cripple Russia’s ability to launch a retaliatory response to a first strike.

This Feb 27, the now late Polish Pres Kaczynski ratified a Status of Forces Agreement with the US for the stationing of the latter’s troops on his nation’s soil. On Mar 5, the Polish armed forces launched combat training exercises with the participation of “scores of US Army soldiers.” Going backward in time, in Aug 2008 the US signed an agreement with Poland that contains the “commitment for both states to come to each other’s assistance in case of military threats.” What certainly appears to be a mutual defense pact. In 2002 Poland signed the largest military purchase agreement in its history: 48 F-16 multirole jet fighters, the first of which were delivered in 2006. They were the first US fighters provided to a former Eastern Bloc nation. In 2005 Poland became the first former Warsaw Pact state to assume control of the NATO Baltic air patrol established immediately after Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania joined the bloc in 2004. Polish warplanes took over the task from US F-16 Fighting Falcons. Poland will again take control of the mission next month with four warplanes operating out of and 100 troops stationed at the Lithuanian Air Force base at Siauliai. In 2007 the Pentagon announced plans to sell Romania 48 F-16s as well, 24 new and 24 refurbished older jet fighters, for $4.5b, without doubt the most expensive military purchase in that nation’s history also. Late last month the Romanian government confirmed its decision to buy the 24 second-hand F-16s, beating out competition from France’s Dassault (Rafale), Sweden’s SAAB (Grippen) and EADS (the Eurofighter). Early this month, US arms manufacturer Textron disclosed it would jointly produce armored vehicles with a Romanian counterpart as “Romania is planning to buy about 800 armored vehicles.” Romania’s NATO accession has proven invaluable for the Pentagon’s plans for expansion from Europe to the east and the south and has been correspondingly lucrative for US arms firms.

In March the Czech press revealed that “the Czech Republic is in discussions with the Obama administration to host a command center for the US’s altered missile-defense plan.” During the recently-concluded Nuclear Security Summit in Washington, where a number of decidedly unrelated agreements were reached including the US securing the right for military overflights from Kazakhstan, Czech Defense Minister Bartak disclosed that his discussions in the US capital included ones with Under Sec Def for Policy Michele Flournoy and Under Sec State for Arms Control Ellen Tauscher, the latter a long-time point person for US missile shield projects in Eastern Europe. In addition to being pressured by his US interlocutors to provide more troops for the Afghan war, Bartak said the three talked about Washington’s interceptor missile system, specifically that “The Czech Republic may be a part of a new warning system against possible enemy missile attacks,” personally adding that “the Czech Republic is prepared to participate in the system.” To demonstrate that the deliberations were not of an abstract nature, the Czech defense chief also mentioned the “sharing of data from commanding and observing elements placed in two locations in the Czech Republic.” Both the missile shield command center and the surveillance sites would include, in fact would be run by, US military personnel. As will the (presumably) SM-3 interceptor missile sites offered to the US in February by Romanian and Bulgarian government officials.

In Hungary, the world’s first multi-national strategic airlift operation was activated last July at the Papa Air Base. Although established under the auspices of NATO and jointly operated by twelve NATO and all-but-acknowledged NATO members, the US, Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania and Slovenia and Finland and Sweden, it is not under NATO command. It is a US enterprise for the expanding war in Afghanistan with, as one US officer assigned to the command put it, a “24-hours-a-day, seven-days-a-week” operation which “recently moved 2.1m lbs of equipment essential to surge operations supporting ISAF in Afghanistan.” USAF personnel are deployed there for the indefinite future, as their fellow service members are in Bulgaria and Romania and soon will be in Poland. In former Soviet space, in addition to the participation of US warplanes over the Baltic nations of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania and regular participation in NATO Partnership for Peace and other war games in Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Armenia, the Pentagon has established a permanent presence in Georgia since 2002, first with a Train and Equip Program and since then with US Marines there on an ongoing basis and a steady parade of Marine commanders in and out of the capital of Tbilisi. Most recently Lt-Gen Natonski, Commander of US Marine Corps Forces Command, and Brig-Gen Brier, Commander of US Marine Corps Forces Europe and US Marine Forces Africa, earlier this month. US troops and equipment were in that nation during the five-day war with Russia in Aug 2008 and are there now. The US guided missile frigate USS John L. Hall arrived at the Georgian Black Sea port of Poti on Apr 14 for a week of joint exercises.

In turbulent Kyrgyzstan, the US runs one of the largest transit operations for the war in Afghanistan. In March, AfPak rep Holbrooke stated that 35,000 US troops pass through the air base at Manas each month on their way to and from Afghanistan, and CENTCOM has acknowledged that the number reached 50,000 last month. In neighboring Kazakhstan, the US gained military flyover rights with the government on Apr 11, which include for the first time the transit of combat troops and lethal military equipment. A Kyrgyz news source revealed that in discussions with Kazakh Pres Nazarbayev, Obama and his main Russian and Eurasian hand Michael McFaul, the last-named proposed the establishment of a US military base in Kazakhstan to either supplement or replace if need be the Transit Center at Manas in Kyrgyzstan. Retired Russian Gen Ivashov has stated that new US-Kazakh military cooperation plans “threaten the interests of Russia and other countries, notably China and especially Iran against which the US is preparing a military operation,” particularly if as seems increasingly likely the US opens “a military base in Kazakhstan similar in size to the Kyrgyz facility.” In the post-Cold War period, the Pentagon through bilateral agreements, but even more through NATO partnerships, has ensconced itself in former Warsaw Pact and Soviet nations from the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea to Central Asia. From the Balkans to the Chinese border.

4 Comments

  1. Hoarsewhisperer
    Posted April 16, 2010 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    This extract tells you all you need to know about Auntie Sam…
    …the Pentagon has established a permanent presence in Georgia since 2002, first with a Train and Equip Program and since then with US Marines there on an ongoing basis and a steady parade of Marine commanders in and out of the capital of Tbilisi. Most recently Lt-Gen Natonski, Commander of US Marine Corps Forces Command, and Brig-Gen Brier, Commander of US Marine Corps Forces Europe and US Marine Forces Africa, earlier this month. US troops and equipment were in that nation during the five-day war with Russia in Aug 2008 and are there now.

    Yikes! So, the Russians ignored the presence of USAians in Georgia? How embarrassing. One could be forgiven for thinking China isn’t the only major power to regard Auntie Sam as a Paper Tiger.

  2. niqnaq
    Posted April 16, 2010 at 3:20 pm | Permalink

    Rozoff discussed this fact previously, in this article:

    U.S. Marines In The Caucasus As West Widens Afghan War

    The US DoD’s training and arming of the Georgian military started long before the deployment to Iraq and that underway for Afghanistan. In Apr 2002, the Pentagon instituted the Georgia Train and Equip Program (GTEP) under the broader Operation Enduring Freedom “Global War On Terror” (GWOT) campaign, whose main target was Afghanistan. For the first nine months the GTEP was run by US Army Special Forces, Green Berets, assigned to Special Operations Command Europe. In Dec 2002, the program was passed on from the Green Berets to the US Marine Corps. Later, the Pentagon created a Georgian Sustainment & Stability Operations Program (GSSOP) under the aegis of EUCOM, whose top military commander is also NATO SAC. This program concentrated on training Georgia’s officer staff as well as soldiers for eventual deployment to Iraq, NATO integration and armed assaults against Abkhazia and South Ossetia. The GSSOP succeeded in all three of its objectives, though not to the degree intended in the third category. The redeployment of US Marines to Georgia, then, is indicative of a continuous effort by the Pentagon ranging over more than seven years to prepare the Georgian armed forces, a US and NATO proxy army, for wars abroad and in the South Caucasus alike.

  3. Hoarsewhisperer
    Posted April 16, 2010 at 4:22 pm | Permalink

    I’ve seen that article. It is one of many tracts which have contributed to my opinions about the Pentagoon’s pipe dream – that show-boating will somehow conceal their spinelessness.
    We’ll never know how many “top-notch” US military advisors became collateral damage while watching Russia undo all their handiwork in less than a week. It doesn’t say much for Georgia’s wishful thinkers either.

    That’s the nice thing about America’s secret wars. The dimwits who sign on for them probably agree to a ‘disownment’ clause like the one which preceded each episode of Mission Impossible. i.e. they know in advance that nobody will ever know, or care, that they died for a lie.

  4. niqnaq
    Posted April 16, 2010 at 4:39 pm | Permalink

    Well, Horsy, they may be morons, but they are all armed to the teeth, so they can make a frightful mess.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.