one more like this and russia will send fighter escorts

Missiles reportedly fired at Russian passenger plane over Syria
Russia Today, Apr 29 2013

Two missiles were reportedly fired at a Russian plane with at least 159 passengers on board that was flying over Syrian territory. Russian officials admit the jet faced danger, but are not talking of a targeted attack. The news broke in on Monday as Interfax, citing “an informed source in Moscow,” reported that a Russian passenger plane was attacked. The source told the Russian agency:

Syrian [officials] informed us that on Monday morning, unidentified forces launched two ground-to-air missiles which exploded in the air very close to a civilian aircraft belonging to a Russian airline. The pilots reportedly managed to maneuver the plane in time however, saving the lives of passengers. It is believed the aircraft was intentionally targeted, but it remains unclear whether the attackers knew it was Russian or not.

However, Russian officials, though admitting the plane might have been endangered, are not yet talking of a targeted attack. The Russian Foreign Ministry’s said on its website the plane’s crew at 4.55 PM Moscow time (12.55 GMT) “detected battle action on the ground that, according to the crew, could constitute a threat to the 159 passengers on board the plane.” The Russian Foreign Ministry is now “taking emergency measures to clarify all the circumstances of this situation, including making contact with the Syrian authorities,” the ministry’s spokesperson Aleksandr Lukashevich said. Meanwhile, Russia’s federal air traffic agency Rosaviatsia has issued a warning to all Russian airlines to avoid routes over conflict zones. The plane that was allegedly targeted belonged to Nordwind Airlines, a Russian charter air carrier, and was identified as an Airbus A320. On Apr 29 it was en route to the city of Kazan, in Russia’s republic of Tatarstan, from Egypt’s resort city of Sharm el-Sheikh. So far, there are no grounds to claim that the aircraft became a target of a missile attack, experts say. It was flying over a mountainous area in Syria when one of the pilots noticed “flashes on the ground.” After that, to keep safe, it was decided to increase the height of the flight, Irina Tyurina, a spokeswoman for Russian Union of Tourist Industry told RIA Novosti. The Russian Federal Agency for Tourism told news agencies:

No one was injured, and the plane was not damaged. The aircraft landed in Kazan as had been planned. There were 159 passengers and 8 crew members on board the aircraft.

Meanwhile, Syrian aviation authorities received no indication of the alleged attack on the Russian plane, says the director of Syrian Airlines, Ghaida Abdullatif:

We contacted the service that monitors traffic within Syrian airspace. None of the air traffic control services or other ground services at the airports in Damascus and Latakia have confirmed the information of a Russian plane being fired at.

Russian experts have already voiced their doubts that a passenger plane can actually perform the kind of maneuvers that would allow it to avoid a missile attack. Vladimir Gerasimov, a Russian pilot and an expert on flight security told RT:

Planes are usually attacked either from the side or from above. A pilot could not have seen the missiles. A passenger plane crew simply couldn’t see what’s behind. And if something is approaching the plane from the opposite direction, the speed doubles, so there is no time to do anything.

Danny Makki of the Syrian Youth Movement in the UK believes that the incident is no doubt a rebel attack, which could have been carried out with weapons supplied by neighboring governments or taken off the Syrian army. He thinks that the attack is an intentional one and should receive widespread condemnation, just as the attacks carried out by government forces do. Makki said:

The most likely thing that could have happened was rebel fire from missiles that could have been given by regional countries or government forces. No rebel forces would fire a missile at civilian aircraft without it being done intentionally. So it is essentially another reprehensible act that would have been committed by rebel forces, and should gain condemnation from all the states after it is clearer who actually committed it. But it does show that these are not the liberal forces which the West wanted to arm in the first place.