pfc manning, what can i say?

Request to the President for pardon
Bradley Manning, WaPo, Aug 21 2013

The decisions that I made in 2010 were made out of a concern for my country and the world that we live in. Since the tragic events of 9/11, our country has been at war. We’ve been at war with an enemy that chooses not to meet us on any traditional battlefield, and due to this fact we’ve had to alter our methods of combating the risks posed to us and our way of life. I initially agreed with these methods and chose to volunteer to help defend my country. It was not until I was in Iraq and reading secret military reports on a daily basis that I started to question the morality of what we were doing. It was at this time I realized that (in) our efforts to meet the risk posed to us by the enemy, we have forgotten our humanity. We consciously elected to devalue human life both in Iraq and Afghanistan. When we engaged those that we perceived were the enemy, we sometimes killed innocent civilians. Whenever we killed innocent civilians, instead of accepting responsibility for our conduct, we elected to hide behind the veil of national security and classified information in order to avoid any public accountability. In our zeal to kill the enemy, we internally debated the definition of torture. We held individuals at Guantanamo for years without due process. We inexplicably turned a blind eye to torture and executions by the Iraqi government. And we stomached countless other acts in the name of our war on terror.

Patriotism is often the cry extolled when morally questionable acts are advocated by those in power. When these cries of patriotism drown out any logically based dissension, it is usually the American soldier that is given the order to carry out some ill-conceived mission. Our nation has had similar dark moments for the virtues of democracy: the Trail of Tears, the Dred Scott decision, McCarthyism, and the Japanese-American internment camps, to mention a few. I am confident that many of the actions since 9/11 will one day be viewed in a similar light. As the late Howard Zinn once said, “There is not a flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people.” I understand that my actions violated the law; I regret if my actions hurt anyone or harmed the United States. It was never my intent to hurt anyone. I only wanted to help people. When I chose to disclose classified information, I did so out of a love for my country and a sense of duty to others. If you deny my request for a pardon, I will serve my time knowing that sometimes you have to pay a heavy price to live in a free society. I will gladly pay that price if it means we could have a country that is truly conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all women and men are created equal.

The Next Stage of My Life
Chelsea E Manning, Today.com, Aug 22 2013

I want to thank everybody who has supported me over the last three years. Throughout this long ordeal, your letters of support and encouragement have helped keep me strong. I am forever indebted to those who wrote to me, made a donation to my defense fund, or came to watch a portion of the trial. I would especially like to thank Courage to Resist and the Bradley Manning Support Network for their tireless efforts in raising awareness for my case and providing for my legal representation. As I transition into this next phase of my life, I want everyone to know the real me. I am Chelsea Manning. I am a female. Given the way that I feel, and have felt since childhood, I want to begin hormone therapy as soon as possible. I hope that you will support me in this transition. I also request that, starting today, you refer to me by my new name and use the feminine pronoun (except in official mail to the confinement facility). I look forward to receiving letters from supporters and having the opportunity to write back. Thank you.

6 Comments

  1. lafayettesennacherib
    Posted August 23, 2013 at 2:09 am | Permalink

    I’ve got a feeling about this sex change. Snowden and Assange better watch out. Would the MSM even question it if it became routine for captured whistleblowers to discover they wanted to change sex? You bet your ass not!

  2. Sluts for Sisli
    Posted August 23, 2013 at 9:33 am | Permalink

    Were Pvt Manning in Iran, there would be no question re his sexual reassignment. The old Grand Ayatollah Khomeni issued a fatwa in 1983 approving sexual reassignment. Iran’s national health service covers the cost, plus hormone treatment, for its citizens. Iran has become second only to Thailand in sexual reassignment surgeries, and obviously not all the patients are Iranians.

    kassandra

  3. niqnaq
    Posted August 23, 2013 at 9:37 am | Permalink

    I have the impression this is their solution to homosexuality, actually: to encourage at least one stereotypical ‘type’ of homosexual to ‘become a woman’.

  4. hp
    Posted August 25, 2013 at 4:45 pm | Permalink

    Because this is seldom if ever referenced or mentioned here, an injection of thought from Sanskrit Veda seems appropriate to reference and consider. Just for fun..

    “The living entities are mentioned as prakṛti in the Bhagavad-gītā, and in Sanskrit prakṛti is a feminine object. The Lord is always described as the parama-puruṣa, or the supreme male personality. Thus the affection between the Lord and the living entities is something like that between the male and the female. Therefore the term love of Godhead is quite appropriate.

    (Srimad Bhagavatam—-1:7:7—-purport).

  5. niqnaq
    Posted August 25, 2013 at 5:23 pm | Permalink

    But in this case, at most, we would be talking of Manning’s love for humanity.

  6. hp
    Posted August 25, 2013 at 7:43 pm | Permalink

    The only difference between is quantity.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.