Congressmen Reveal Secret Report’s Findings to Discredit Snowden
Shane Harris, ForeignPolicy.com, Jan 9 2014
A Pentagon review has concluded that the disclosure of classified documents taken by Edward Snowden could “gravely impact” US national security and risk the lives of US military personnel, and that leaks to journalists have already revealed sources and methods of intelligence operations to US adversaries. At least, that’s how two Congress critturs who have read the classified report are characterizing its findings. But the critturs, who are working in coordination with the Obama administration and are trying to counter the narrative that Snowden is a heroic whistleblower, offered no specific examples to substantiate their claims. In harsh language that all but accused Snowden of treason, the top members of the House Intelligence Committee said the report shows that Snowden downloaded “1.7 million intelligence files,” which they described as “the single largest theft of secrets in the history of the US.” House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers said in a statement Thursday:
This report confirms my greatest fears. Snowden’s real acts of betrayal place America’s military men and women at greater risk. Snowden’s actions are likely to have lethal consequences for our troops in the field.
Rogers was joined by the committee’s ranking member, Dutch Ruppersberger, who said:
Snowden handed terrorists a copy of our country’s playbook and now we are paying the price, which this report confirms. His actions aligned him with our enemy.
A congressional staffer who is familiar with the report’s findings said that the critturs chose to make some of its contents public in order to counter what they see as a false impression of Snowden as a principled whistleblower who disclosed abuses of power. The staffer told ForeignPolicy.com:
Snowden has been made out by some people to be a hero. What we need to do is really look at the effect of his leaks and see that what he’s done is really harm our country and put citizens at risk. The purpose [of releasing some findings] is to clear the record and show that he’s not a hero.
The staffer said that the administration approved in advance the information that the critturs disclosed. Rogers and Ruppersberger, along with other critturs, were scheduled to meet with Obama at the White House Thursday afternoon to discuss the findings of a review panel on NSA surveillance. The administration is expected to announce plans soon to rein in aspects of NSA’s operations. Rogers and Ruppersberger said:
Much of the information stolen by Snowden is related to current US military operations. Snowden’s disclosures have already tipped off our adversaries to the sources and methods of our defense, and hurt US allies helping us with counter-terrorism, cyber-crime, human and narcotics trafficking, and WMD proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
They cited press reports that have focused on foreign intelligence gathering by the NSA, but they cited no specific articles or specific documents to support their claim. The report was conducted by the DIA, in coordination with other intelligence agencies across the government, according to two sources familiar with its findings. A spokesperson for the DIA said DDIA Lt-Gen Michael Flynn organized a task force “to assess the potential impact to the DoS from the compromise of this information.” But the spokesman did not say what, if any, conclusions the task force had reached about actual damage caused by documents Snowden took, regardless of whether they’ve been disclosed or not. Critics accused the two of selectively leaking information and using vague language about the real versus potential damage from Snowden’s disclosures. Trevor Timm, the co-founder and executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, wrote in a blog post:
No specific examples are actually given, and you will also notice in virtually every sentence includes the word ‘could’, meaning real damage hasn’t actually occurred, they are just saying it potentially could happen. And of course, the actual report is secret, so these two are able to say whatever they wish about it, and it can’t be independently verified.
Shawn Turner, a spokesperson for the DNI, said:
I can’t comment on the findings of the classified report, but Snowden’s leaks in general have been unnecessarily and extremely damaging to the US and the intelligence community’s national security efforts. As a result of these disclosures, terrorists and their support networks, now have a better understanding of our collection methods, and make no mistake about it, they are taking counter-measures. Specifically, we have seen in response to the Snowden leaks AQ and affiliated groups seeking to change their tactics, looking to see what they can learn from what’s in the press and seeking to change how they communicate to avoid detection and avoid our surveillance.
The question of how much information took from the NSA has been difficult to answer, and the statement from the Congress critturs didn’t clarify the matter. Estimates in the press, quoting anonymous officials, have ranged from 50,000 documents to nearly two million. The critturs didn’t specify what constituted an “intelligence file,” as they put it, in claiming that Snowden had disclosed 1.7 million of them. The senior NSA official leading its review of the leaks, Richard Ledgett, was asked in an interview with 60 Minutes about claims that Snowden has taken 1.7 million “documents”, and he replied: “I wouldn’t dispute that.” Ledgett is in line to become the next DDNSA, following the resignation of previous #2 Chris Inglis, according to sources who are familiar with the matter.
Niqnaq 