lets get really analytical, sorry about the peculiar english

Paris Massacre: Who Is Behind It?
Ahmed Rajiv, South Front, Nov 15 2015

Many political pundits have stated that the West is running a flawed policy in the Middle East. But it is not true at all. The seemingly flawed policy is to create ‘justified’ grounds to wage a full-scale war on Middle East, to occupy the natural wealth and to make strong their geopolitical range where nobody in future dare to ask for share. The West has already created sufficient destructions in the Middle East and now they are applying it on their own land, where those mastermind-political-elites and big corporations are safe but not those innocent civilians. The terrorism which often misunderstood as Islamic terrorism was created and nurtured by the Western intelligence agencies to fight the Soviet Union back in 80s. Western intelligence found that this particular kind of terrorism had a potential to spread more than any ideology in the earth because it can make an impact in a huge demography of Muslim society. So after getting a fruitful result from the Afghan-Soviet war, the West started to use this so-called terrorism to fulfil their own geopolitical agenda in a potential geographical areas.

We saw how west used the terror of Osama bin Laden and AQ to occupy and create social divisions in Afghanistan for business rout, oil and geopolitical gains. The direct war on Iraq, the indirect war on Syria, the colour revolutions and killing of the national leaders in some Middle Eastern countries had a direct effect on breeding of more hateful people against the western values and ideologies. It is a well-designed, illusion-full, global politics of the West to wage a war of occupation while avoiding the image of the Fascists. This year, more than 1 million Syrian and other Arabs made their way to Europe specially to Germany and Austria with the help of the West. The German Chancellor and other key political figures actually approved that mass migration, to unsettle Europe according to the interest of the western corporations and elites. There were reports that with those migrants, there came thousands of war-trained terrorists in Europe. So, the West designed migratory weapons already installed in a vast area of Europe to start terror attacks on the civilian people, who ironically pay their taxes to the government for their security and well-being. In other words, Europeans are paying taxes to make their life unsafe. And it is inevitable when corporation sees people as consumers not human beings.

The well-designed game of the Middle East had been running fantastic according to the Western interest till the Russian entrance into the war-filled stage of the Middle East. The West felt a strong threat on implementing their plan of containing the Middle East fully. The Syrian government was their main obstacle, and President Assad survived many attemps of toppling by the west and their regional allies. On the other hand, the Western proxy agents who are known as ‘terrorists’ and later ‘moderate rebels’ in Syria and Iraq lost significant assets during the month-long Russian air campaign along with the Syrian military and other armed forces supports. It was an advancement against the proxy military establishments of the West in the heart of Middle East. Interestingly, when the West had been observing the defeat of their proxy forces, they pumped up their diplomatic activity to sit for a peace deal on the Syria issue. Last month, there was a meeting in Vienna where 19 interest groups met on the Syria issue. And after two days, the world saw the Russian plane disaster that killed 224 Russian citizens in Egypt. Later, many intelligence agencies claimed that the plane was downed by a bomb. So apparently the Vienna settlement did not work. If there had been a settlement, then nobody would have planted a bomb in an airplane. As Putin spoke about the double play of the west, here you can see how the west double-played by settling a issue on the table and unleashing destruction undercover. By downing the plane, the West conveys a message to Russia that the future of Middle East can only be decided by the West, where Russia must restrain from their effort.

Let’s come to the Paris massacre. those who can recall the Mumbai attack of 2008, there is a similarity between two attacks. They came eight in Mumbai equipped with AK-47s, but did not wear any suicide vests. Paris attackers were upgraded with suicide vests for maximum casuality or a strategy of “kill as many as you can,” so there won’t be any shortage of terror and panic. Though those attacks had similarities, but less political connection with each other. On the other side, after that gruesome event of mass killing of more than 150 people the global powers have been echoing each other’s thoughts and intentions. The Pindo president said, “This is an attack on all of humanity and the universal values we share, and we stand prepared and ready to provide whatever assistance the people of France need to respond.” The French president said it is an act of war by ISIS, and he pledges to take counter-actions. The Israeli PM said, “Israel stands shoulder to shoulder with Pres Hollande and with the people of France in our common battle against terrorism.” The British PM said, “We are with you.” So one can easily predict from the above statements that the West will come up with an idea to fight hard the so-called Islamic terrorism by waging an all-out war (GWOT) in Iraq, Syria and other parts of the Middle East under the NATO umbrella. And the West will again wage this without a UNSCR.

So, the Paris massacre gave the West a moral justification and assertion of a global consent to fight hard in Iraq and Syria. The next NATO campaign will be something similar to the ‘Shock and Awe’ campaign that we had witnessed during the Pindo invasion of Afghanistan Iraq. As geopolitics has no room for emotions and moral values, these Western designs of ‘Chaos and Occupy’ will not harm the elites or the Atlanticists but they will create existential crisis for the general population for certain countries who contains other cultural and religious values. The forthcoming GWOT by the NATO force will change the present geopolitical shapes of the Middle East. The war will have an intent to show more military power than the Russians, to re-establish their firm military control on specific important locations, so that the regional powers of the Middle East accept the Western military supremacy. The coming NATO Middle East GWOT will also try to contain Iran by all means, so that the West can establish their own puppet who will sell all national assets to the West without the people’s consent. On the other hand, the journey of the BRICS and other alternative economic and political blocs will be hampered timelessly. The soft powers and the ‘wannabe powers'( Turkey and India) from different parts of the world will pay their allegiance to the Western bloc for their coming exhibition of might in Middle East. So the attack on Paris will help the West to fulfil its geopolitical ambitions in Middle East much better than before. But sadly there will be more blood in the deserts of the Middle East and the streets of Europe, and only the global elites will remain safe.

Some Observations About the Carnage in Paris
As’ad AbuKhalil, The Angry Arab (Blog), Nov 14 2015

1. ISIS has gone on the offensive: in ten days, they downed a Russian civilian airliner, massacred Hazara Shi`ites in Afghanistan, bombed the southern suburbs of Beirut and now Paris.
2. Western governments: Pindostan and France in particular along with their Toad, Qatar, and Turkish allies are directly responsible for the rise and expansion of ISIS through their policies in Syria which cuddled and nurtured ISIS and its sister terrorist organizations.
3. There is no way on earth to stem the menace of ISIS and AQ-like organizations without going to the source, in Saudi Arabia which is the official headquarters of the Ibn Taymiyyah’s terrorist interpretation of Islam.
4. Ibn Taymiyyah is the one thinker/theologian who has inspired and guided the deeds and thoughts of terrorists striking in the name of Islam.
5. Western governments AND media have been rather cynically silent about victims of ISIS terrorism if the civilian victims happen to be categorized as “enemies”. Western governments AND media (look at the dispatches from NYT and WaPo over the last 4 years about Syria) have consistently ignored and even cheered sectarian massacres of Syrian and Lebanese civilians if seems as being perpetrated by foes of the Syrian regime.
6. Just as ISIS and AQ brought terrorism to the heart of the West, Western governments have also been exporting death and destruction to the MENA: from Mali to Libya to Egypt to Sudan to Somalia to Syria to Iraq to AfPak. Terrorism has been inflicted on people in those countries by the terrorism of ISIS and AQ and by the bombs and rockets and drones of Western governments.
7. All Arabs today have noticed something that can’t be ignored: how ISIS and AQ terrorists travel the world to inflict their terrorism by yet spare Israel and its interests. The relationship between the Israeli Zionist occupation entity and Jabhat al-Nusra, the official branch of AQ in Syria, is not a secret any more.
8. ISIS can’t be defeated from the air as long as Western governments and their Gulf and Turkish allies assist it on the ground, directly or indirectly.
9. Just as Western powers created and nurtured the precursor of AQ in Afghanistan in order to defeat the communist regime there, those same powers have created and nurtured a cocktail of the worst Middle East terrorists ever in Syria in the hope that they would bring down the Syrian regime.
10. The story of ISIS terrorism began with not only the invasion of Iraq and its repercussions in 2003 but also with the creation of a vast save haven for Islamist terrorism in Libya. Libya was the biggest gift to Jihadi terrorism since the fall of the Taliban.
11. Pindostan and France have been creating the culture of terrorism in the region (along with GCC regimes) but creating a reckless and terrorist haven in Syria in the name of fighting for “democracy and secularism,” in the stupid language of Jackass Kerry, by making dubious distinctions between various terrorists in Syria through making allies with Jabhat al-Nusra there and its affiliates.
12. The myth of moderate Syrian rebels in Syria has to be discarded. The remnants of FSA units are basically ISIS in waiting.
13. Western correspondents in Beirut who are in charge of covering the Syrian savage war are all guilty (with the exception of Patrick Cockburn) for misinforming their leaders and misguiding them. They have been ignoring AND JUSTIFYING the scores of car bombs and war crimes by Syrian rebels in Syria and Lebanon because those crimes fit into their struggle against the Syrian regime.
14. Western human rights organizations are also guilty for creating a culture of bogus human rights rhetoric which belittled and even justified the war crimes of Syrian rebels (see the latest human rights report by HRW on placing Alawi women in cages).
15. French policy under the socialist government has even elevated the relationship with the Saudi and Qatari regimes, the two governments which more than anyone have sponsored and armed and financed the cocktail of the most dangerous terrorists in Syria.
16. It is high time that Western governments give up on their policies and wars in Syria not to preserve the Syrian regime (as Iran and Russia would like) but to exclude from the future of Syria both sides of war criminals there.
17. I don’t like Bashar al-Assad one bit, and I have wanted the overthrow of that regime since 1976, when its army invaded Lebanon and smashed my dreams of a progressive leftist revolution in Lebanon, but who can now disagree with the warnings given by him three years ago that those terrorists that they are helping will one day strike in the heart of Europe? Syrian regime supporters all over are today reproducing those remarks and airing them.
18. The Toad and Qatar regime media (al-Jazeera and al-Arabiyya in particular but others as well) have created a culture of terrorism in which crimes against civilians who happen to be Shi`i or Alawi or Christian or Sunni who reside in “regime-dominated areas of Syria” are justified on a daily basis. Just yesterday, after the bombs of the southern suburbs both Toad and Qatar regime media provided ample justifications and rationalization for the crimes and lionized the terrorists who perpetrated them. This culture of terrorism is responsible for the climate in which the crimes of Paris take place.
19. Western governments can’t have it both ways: they can’t continue to support Gulf regimes and arm them while claiming to want to fight terrorism.
20. Pindo and Western governments and media are responsible for the selective denunciations and condemnations culture: they are silent about the daily crimes against the Plastelinan civilian population by key West ally, the terrorist state of Israel.
21. Arabs/Muslims and Westerners can’t get to reach a common understanding against all manners of terrorism as long as Western governments and Arab regimes continue to be selective in condemnation of terrorism.
22. Western support for dictatorships in the Arab world are responsible in many ways for the creation of ISIS and those terrorist groups.
23. Terrorist groups in the Middle East have been used and misused by local regimes and Western powers and Israel for many decades.
24. Yes, the Iraq invasion of 2003 has proven to be exactly what Jacques Chirac has warned it would be: a dangerous Pandora’s Box.
25. Obama has really not deviated from the dangerous policies of Bush 43, and his expansion of the wars in the Middle East has fueled the rise of ISIS.
26. The Islam of Arab regimes is a dangerous and conservative Islam. It can’t be changed by the military commanders of Western powers, but it can be changed by the people of the region, if they are allowed to choose and think freely: but neither the West nor the Arab regimes want the Arabs to think freely. Al-Azhar University has become through bribes a tool for the Toads’ Wahhabi regime.
27. It is not sectarian to declare the Toads’ Wahhabi doctrine as the official doctrine of Jihadi terrorism. Wahhabiyyah is not a sect: it is a school of fanatical terrorist thought and practice.
28. How does Western powers fight ISIS? They foolishly rely on a royal buffoon in Jordan and on the UAE regime to engage in promoting a kinder Islam in social media. The fools in DC who think that those potentates have any standing among the young Muslims need to have their heads examined.
29. Western powers and media are all hypocrites: they still cheer or cover up the war crimes of ISIS and Nusra in Syria if the affected victims happen to reside in Syrian regime-controlled areas.
30. There should be a categorical end to external support of ALL Syrian rebels and to the Syrian regime by all sides.
31. There is more but I have to run.
32. Oh, also: why does the media coverage make these massacres West-versus-Islam, when many of the victims in Paris would most likely include many Muslims, and when ISIS in the Middle East kill more Muslims than non-Muslims, despite the fact that Pindosi Congress critturs only see Jews and Christians as victims but not Muslims.