US And Its Allies Try to Split the World in Two
Eric Zuesse, Strategic Culture, May 16 2021
America’s response to the increasing economic success of China and other nations that until recent decades were impoverished former colonies is to organize its own allies, especially the English-speaking countries, to become a totally separate global economic trading and military alliance standing against that “third world,” and thereby force all non-aligned nations to have to either choose to be allied with the US, or else become conquered by the US and its allies. It’s “Us” or “Them” all the way. The top “enemies” (the “Them”) are the same countries that America and its allies were against during the anti-communist Cold War, Russia and China, even though Russia is no longer communist, and China has become a mixture between communism and capitalism. America has on its side Saudi Arabia, Israel, Qatar, UAE and all four of the fascist nations during WW2: Germany, Japan, Italy and Spain, as well as many other nations. Russia and China were both allies of the US during the war against Hitler and his allies, but Franklin Delano Roosevelt had to fight against considerable American support for the fascist powers (overwhelmingly coming from Republicans) during the years before Japan’s Pearl Harbor attack on Dec 7 1941. In fact, on Nov 23 1937, Hitler’s agents Kurt von Tippleskirch and Manfred von Killinger, two Barons, were secretly negotiating with top Republicans, including the racist Irénée du Pont, what would have been the Duponts’ second coup attempt against FDR, but neither attempt succeeded.
As soon as Harry S Truman (whom the Democratic Party’s billionaires chose to be FDR’s VP in 1944) became President on FDR’s death on Apr 12 1945, the alliance with the Soviet Union ended, and the Cold War gelled in Truman’s mind on Jul 25 1945 because of advice from General Dwight Eisenhower, whom Truman practically worshipped. On Jun 19 1945, Truman wrote to his wife, Bess:
He’s done a whale of a job. They are running him for President, which is OK with me. I’d turn it over to him now if I could.
And on Jul 25 1945, Ike told Truman that either the Soviet Union would conquer the world or else America would, and this apparently convinced Truman to go for global empire and to conquer the Soviet Union. America’s increasingly used method for conquest is the method that was first done against Iraq starting in 1991: international sanctions, followed by coup attempts that if unsuccessful are then followed by an outright military invasion, with or without UN approval. More recently, this stepwise method (sanctions, failed coup, then invasion) is being used against Syria, but America no longer applies its own troops for its invasions, and instead uses hired proxy-forces (mercenaries), such as, in Syria, jihadis hired from around the world and paid for by the Sauds, and also uses separatist Kurds are hired who have long wanted to break away from Iraq, Syria and Turkey in order to establish their own Kurdistan nation, and who are controlled more directly from Washington, since the Sauds don’t control Kurdish forces. America’s troops in Syria train and arm (usually with money being supplied by the royal families of Saudi Arabia and Qatar) the jihadis (who are Al Qaeda-affiliated) and the Kurds.
Right now, America is using its post-WW2 position of being the world’s hegemon or globally dominant nation, so as to basically compel every other nation either to join them (as a banana republic or vassal nation) or else to become their enemy by destroying them, as Washington and its allies have done to Syrians, Yemenis, Palestinians, Ukrainians, Venezuelans, Bolivians, Ecuadorans and before that Hondurans, Guatemalans, El Salvadorans, Argentinians, Chileans, Iranians and many others in what Washington calls “The Free World.” Ideology is no longer the excuse. Now the excuses are “democracy,” “human rights,” “fighting against corruption,” and, of course “national defense” (which likewise was Hitler’s main excuse). In other words: America is trying to do everything it can to avoid becoming downgraded to become the world’s #2 nation, in terms of power. America’s billionaires are behind this; America’s Government is controlled by them. The best single statement of America’s position is the speech that Obama gave to the graduating cadets at West Point Military Academy on May 28 2014, where he said:
The US is and remains the one indispensable nation. That has been true for the century passed and it will be true for the century to come. Russia’s aggression toward former Soviet states unnerves capitals in Europe, while China’s economic rise and military reach worries its neighbors. From Brazil to India, rising middle classes compete with us, and governments seek a greater say in global forums. It will be your generation’s task to respond to this new world.
America “responds” to the rising power of nations that formerly had been colonies, by means of offering them this choice: Join with us, or else be destroyed. As the US Establishment presents and promotes this, it is ‘justified’ because only America is “indispensable.” All other nations are “dispensable.” Hitler too felt that way about all other nations, and most Germans endorsed that supremacism then, just like most Americans support it today. FDR had planned a non-fascist future for the world, but then he died and (because of whom FDR’s successor was) we got a fascist future instead, and that’s what we have. Mussolini called fascism “corporationism.” And America is more and more corporationist every decade that passes. Under the bigoted Hindu-nationalist Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, India is now clearly part of the US-UK-led alliance. On Mar 4 2021, Munira Lokhandwala headlined “Google Invests Billions in India as Modi and Allies Stage Corporate Takeover of Agriculture” and reported:
In particular, Google’s multi-billion dollar investment in the telecommunications company owned by oil and gas billionaire Mukesh Ambani shows how US Big Tech will stop at nothing to make a bigger profit, even if this includes legitimizing a key supporter of the authoritarian-leaning government that is now a target of mass revolt. Ambani is India’s richest man and a strong corporate ally to BJP leadership, perceived by many as a major beneficiary of the hated agricultural reforms. In Sep 2020, the Indian Parliament approved the Indian Agriculture Acts of 2020, also known as the “Farm Bills.” In response, Indian farmers who opposed these bills launched one of the largest protests and series of cross-sectoral strikes that the world has ever seen. It’s estimated that over 250m people have participated in protests against the passage of these bills that Indian farmers see as another phase in the continued attack on their livelihoods and an attempt to deregulate the farming industry to allow for greater private-sector control of food distribution. These changes would favor large corporations like Ambani’s Reliance Industries, who would thrive under the free market conditions that these Farm Bills would create.
India, in the Rhodesist plan, would be a major counter-weight to China. Japan is another. On Apr 23 2021, Craig Mark bannered “From Five Eyes To Six? Japan’s Push To Join The West’s Intelligence Alliance”, and he reported:
As tensions with China continue to grow, Japan is making moves to join the “Five Eyes” intelligence-sharing alliance. This week, Japan’s ambassador to Australia, Shingo Yamagami, told The Sydney Morning Herald he was “optimistic” about his country coming on board. “I would like to see this idea become reality in the near future.”
This comes as New Zealand voices its concerns over using the Five Eyes process to pressure China. What is the Five Eyes? And what are the benefits and risks to bringing Japan on board? Beginning as an intelligence exchange agreement between the US and UK in 1943, it formally became the UKUSA Agreement in 1946. The agreement then extended to Canada in 1948, and Australia and New Zealand in 1956. UK has gotten Japan’s Ambassador to Australia to assist Australia to pressure progressive New Zealand to remain in the Rhodesist alliance and thereby help to bring Japan into the Rhodesist core as being the first-ever non-English-speaking country to be admitted into the Rhodes-core (and thereby turn the “Five Eyes” into six). That would achieve what David Rockefeller and his sidekick Zbigniew Brzezinski (who was a member of Poland’s nobility) had been attempting to do by means of their Trilateral Commission, which was intended to expand beyond the Bilderberg group of NATO countries so as to include also Japan.
On Apr 30 2021, the geostrategic analyst Alexander Mercouris headlined a video “Blinken Goes To Ukraine With A Tough Message For Zelensky” and explained that because Putin recently established “red lines” that would provoke a direct military conflict between Russia and the US if violated by the US, Biden has refocused America’s top target to be conquered as being no longer Russia but instead now China. Mercouris says that Ukraine’s US stooge Zelensky will probably now be forced to stop threatening to invade the breakaway formerly Ukrainian Donbas region. However, whereas the US aristocracy’s main medium-term objective is to retain control over Ukraine so as to become enabled to blitz-launch missiles from there to eliminate Moscow’s ability to retaliate against America’s first-strike hit (the US alliance’s updated version of the Nazis’ Operation Barbarossa), the UK’s main medium-term objective is for the US-UK-Saud-Qatar alliance to arm and train jihadis and separatist Kurds to conquer Syria so that the Sauds will control that country. The long-term objective, both of America’s and UK’s aristocrats, is their shared dictatorship over all nations.
On Apr 30 2021, the international investigative journalist Finian Cunningham interviewed at Strategic Culture the former UK Ambassador to Syria, the astoundingly courageous Peter Ford, and headlined “Syria Regime Change Still on Western Agenda – Ex-Ambassador Peter Ford”. This whistleblowing former UK Ambassador opened his comments by saying:
The Western powers are like dogs with an old bone on the subject of alleged use of chemical weapons in Syria. There is no meat on it but they continue to gnaw away. Why? Because the trope that “Assad gasses his own people” has become a cornerstone of the whole Western propaganda narrative on Syria. Without it, justifying the cruel economic war on Syria, largely through sanctions, would be harder to justify. And with military efforts at regime change having failed, economic warfare is now the last hope for the Western powers of destabilizing Syria enough to topple the government. For this strategy to work the Western powers are more than ready to undermine the credibility of the OPCW by abusing their ability to manipulate it in the Syrian context.
The interview closed with:
Question: Finally, Syria is holding presidential elections on May 26 in which incumbent Bashar al-Assad is running for re-election. The Western powers disparage Syria as an “undemocratic regime.” How do you view Syria’s polity? Is Assad likely to win re-election?
Peter Ford: Of course Assad will win, and of course the Western powers will try to disparage his victory. But I can state with certainty that if you could offer the Conservative party in Britain a guarantee of achieving in the next general election anything anywhere near Assad’s genuine level of support, albeit some of it reluctant from a war-weary people, the Tories would bite your hand off for such an electoral gain. Much of the current Western propaganda effort against Syria is geared at trying to spoil Assad’s victory and deny it legitimacy. But inside Syria itself, the people will see the election as setting the seal on 10 years of struggle, and Assad will emerge strengthened as he faces the next phase in the Western war on Syria.
Furthermore, just the same as the US and their allies were funding, training and arming jihadis (technically called “Salafi Muslims”) in order to bring about regime change in Syria, they’re doing the very same thing in order to bring about regime change in China, in that instance by propagandizing ‘human rights’ for Uyghur Chinese who have been indoctrinated with the Sauds’ extremist-Sunni variant of the Islamic faith (Salafism). Many of those Salafis, because of their Turkic culture, have recently become more favorable to Turkey than to Saudi Arabia, and therefore on Jul 18 2019, Reuters headlined “Saudi Arabia defends letter backing China’s Xinjiang policy”, and reported:
The Sauds defended signing a letter along with 36 other countries in support of China’s policies in its western region of Xinjiang, where the UN says at least 1m ethnic Uighurs and other Muslims have been detained.
The US and UK were now backing pro-Turkish jihadis instead of pro-Saudi ones. Turkey is a NATO nation, and so the Rhodesists don’t care which brand of jihad they are backing in order to break up or bring regime change to China. So even if the US regime might be placing Ukraine onto the back burner, the UK regime is apparently unwilling to place the conquest of Syria onto its back burner. And, for both US billionaires and UK billionaires, China is unrelentingly in the gunsights of both aristocracies to conquer. In fact, on Apr 10 2021, Strategic Culture issued an editorial called “Ukraine, Taiwan … Two-Pronged US Aggression Toward Russia, China” which noted:
Biden is advancing the same policy (as) under the previous Trump and Obama administrations of military build-up near China’s territory. This week saw the fourth US guided-missile destroyer passing through the Taiwan Strait since Biden took office. That narrow sea separates the breakaway island from China’s mainland. Beijing has sovereign territorial claim to Taiwan which is recognized by the vast majority of nations, including up until recently the US under its so-called “One China” policy. Biden, like his predecessor Trump, is deliberately eroding the One China policy by sending delegates to the island on official visits, increasing weapons sales and most provocatively making public declarations that the US will “defend” Taiwan in the event of “an invasion” by Chinese forces.
Similar to the Ukraine, the Biden administration’s rhetoric and conduct is serving to fuel an ever more provocative stance by the Taiwanese leaders. This week, a senior official warned that the island’s forces would shoot down Chinese aircraft that approach the territory. This is nothing but a flagrant challenge to China’s territorial integrity and sovereignty. As in the case of the Ukraine and Russia, it is Washington’s words and actions that are inflaming the tensions between Taiwan and China. Yet the Americans accuse others of “aggression” and claim to be providing “defense.”
The only entity that could possibly stop all this would be the US-created European Union. Either they will turn against their creator, and join with Russia and China against US and UK, which would put an end to the Rhodesist team’s insanity, or there will be WW3, though probably not in the near-term future, in which the US regime will blitz-nuclear attack Russia, though that would destroy the planet. If the EU does break away from the US, then it will also be able to relocate the UN out of NYC to Europe and reform the UN in what had been its inventor FDR’s intention, that the UN become the democratic global federation of nations controlling all nuclear and other geostrategic weapons and forces, and that serves as the sole and authoritative executive, legislative and judicial authority for all international-relations issues throughout the world, the democratic federal world government. That’s what Truman and Churchill prevented, and what would produce a world that will have no future world wars, no future wars between empires, because there would no longer be any empires, nor any imperialism.
Either there will be FDR’s intention, or there will be nuclear annihilation. The EU will decide. For the EU to impose FDR’s intention would be for the EU to turn against its creator, which was Truman and all subsequent US Presidents, and their Congresses, which likewise have been controlled by America’s billionaires. However, a likelier alternative would be for some nations to do as UK did and break away from the EU, but for them to do it as UK did not, to realign themselves with Russia, China and Iran and away from the US That, too, might prevent WW3 and enable the UN to be reformed as FDR had been intending it to be: as the global democratic federal republic and sole source and judge and enforcer of international laws; the post-imperialist world, which FDR had planned for. If FDR’s plan doesn’t happen, then WW3 will happen, and this was the reason why he had been planning the UN as he did. But as soon as he died, on Apr 12 1945, the billionaires’ agents worked on Truman, who finally, on Jul 25 1945, based on General Eisenhower’s advice, decided to go for America’s global conquest; and so the ceaseless string of subversions, coups and invasions by the US, the permanent-warfare state, started. The first coup was 1948 in Thailand, in order to install rulers who would let the OSS-CIA skim from the international narcotics traffic so as to supply the needed off-the-books funding for the CIA’s Special Operations.
Niqnaq 